平衡尺度:社会不平等的考古学方法

IF 1.8 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/00438243.2023.2169341
J. Beck, Colin P. Quinn
{"title":"平衡尺度:社会不平等的考古学方法","authors":"J. Beck, Colin P. Quinn","doi":"10.1080/00438243.2023.2169341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Archaeology lends a critical perspective to research on social inequality due to the field’s unique access to deep history, emphasis on materiality, and explicit incorporation of multiple lines of evidence. This paper offers a concise overview of archaeological approaches aimed at students and scholars in other fields. We develop a categorization of disciplinary strategies, arguing that archaeologists address institutionalized inequality through examining inequalities in the accumulation of goods or resources (economic differentiation); access to resources or knowledge (social differentiation), and inequalities in action, the ability to make decisions for oneself or others (political differentiation). We illustrate these categories with reference to the distinctions between material, relational, and embodied wealth. We draw upon a broad range of geographic, chronological, and cultural case studies to illustrate the flexibility and utility of archaeological methods for answering questions about inequality in human societies.","PeriodicalId":47942,"journal":{"name":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"54 1","pages":"572 - 583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing the scales: archaeological approaches to social inequality\",\"authors\":\"J. Beck, Colin P. Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00438243.2023.2169341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Archaeology lends a critical perspective to research on social inequality due to the field’s unique access to deep history, emphasis on materiality, and explicit incorporation of multiple lines of evidence. This paper offers a concise overview of archaeological approaches aimed at students and scholars in other fields. We develop a categorization of disciplinary strategies, arguing that archaeologists address institutionalized inequality through examining inequalities in the accumulation of goods or resources (economic differentiation); access to resources or knowledge (social differentiation), and inequalities in action, the ability to make decisions for oneself or others (political differentiation). We illustrate these categories with reference to the distinctions between material, relational, and embodied wealth. We draw upon a broad range of geographic, chronological, and cultural case studies to illustrate the flexibility and utility of archaeological methods for answering questions about inequality in human societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"572 - 583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2023.2169341\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2023.2169341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要考古学为研究社会不平等提供了一个批判性的视角,因为该领域具有独特的深入历史的途径,强调物质性,并明确纳入了多条证据线。本文简要概述了针对其他领域的学生和学者的考古方法。我们对学科策略进行了分类,认为考古学家通过研究商品或资源积累中的不平等(经济差异)来解决制度化的不平等;获得资源或知识的机会(社会分化),行动中的不平等,为自己或他人做出决定的能力(政治分化)。我们参照物质财富、关系财富和具体财富之间的区别来说明这些类别。我们利用广泛的地理、时间和文化案例研究来说明考古方法在回答人类社会不平等问题方面的灵活性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing the scales: archaeological approaches to social inequality
ABSTRACT Archaeology lends a critical perspective to research on social inequality due to the field’s unique access to deep history, emphasis on materiality, and explicit incorporation of multiple lines of evidence. This paper offers a concise overview of archaeological approaches aimed at students and scholars in other fields. We develop a categorization of disciplinary strategies, arguing that archaeologists address institutionalized inequality through examining inequalities in the accumulation of goods or resources (economic differentiation); access to resources or knowledge (social differentiation), and inequalities in action, the ability to make decisions for oneself or others (political differentiation). We illustrate these categories with reference to the distinctions between material, relational, and embodied wealth. We draw upon a broad range of geographic, chronological, and cultural case studies to illustrate the flexibility and utility of archaeological methods for answering questions about inequality in human societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: World Archaeology was established specifically to deal with archaeology on a world-wide multiperiod basis. Thirty years after it was founded it remains a leader in its field. The first three of the year"s quarterly issues are each dedicated to a particular theme of current interest. The fourth issue, Debates in World Archaeology, is a forum for debate, discussion and comment. All papers adopt a broad comparative approach, looking at important issues on a global scale. The members of the editorial board and the advisory board represent a wide range of interests and expertise and this ensures that the papers published in World Archaeology cover a wide variety of subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Lower Paleolithic Stone-Animal ontologies: stone scrapers as mediators between early humans and their preferred prey Projectile points, dangers and Amerindian ontologies at eastern Catamarca (Argentina) during the first millennium CE Deaths at the heart of the state: incarcerating working-class youth at Ferme Neuve of Les Douaires, France Archaeology and a case of genocide: the ‘indigenous prisons’ of Minas Gerais, Brazil Towards a political ecology of piracy in the Age of Sail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1