欧盟主观生活质量的综合指标:农村和城市地区

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Prague Economic Papers Pub Date : 2021-08-11 DOI:10.18267/j.pep.783
M. Sánchez-Sellero, Beatriz García-Carro, Pedro Sánchez‐Sellero
{"title":"欧盟主观生活质量的综合指标:农村和城市地区","authors":"M. Sánchez-Sellero, Beatriz García-Carro, Pedro Sánchez‐Sellero","doi":"10.18267/j.pep.783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to develop subjective synthetic indicators that quantify the quality of life in the different countries of the EU-28, with data from the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). We add other indicators to the general synthetic ones in order to quantify the different dimensions of quality life due to its multidimensional nature. The successive but unchained application of the principal component analysis and the Mazziota-Pareto analysis allows us to classify 5 dimensions of quality of life: subjective component of governance, public services, environment, general satisfaction with life, and socioeconomic issues. We verify that countries with the lowest or highest positions in the general index usually keep that position in most dimensions. The spatial perspective is fundamental to study of regional development. For this reason, the next objective is the analysis of differences by spatial location using the variance analysis. The general indicator shows significant differences between EU countries but it does not show differences in the quality of life of European citizens in urban and rural areas.","PeriodicalId":45324,"journal":{"name":"Prague Economic Papers","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Subjective Life in the EU: Rural and Urban Areas\",\"authors\":\"M. Sánchez-Sellero, Beatriz García-Carro, Pedro Sánchez‐Sellero\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/j.pep.783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to develop subjective synthetic indicators that quantify the quality of life in the different countries of the EU-28, with data from the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). We add other indicators to the general synthetic ones in order to quantify the different dimensions of quality life due to its multidimensional nature. The successive but unchained application of the principal component analysis and the Mazziota-Pareto analysis allows us to classify 5 dimensions of quality of life: subjective component of governance, public services, environment, general satisfaction with life, and socioeconomic issues. We verify that countries with the lowest or highest positions in the general index usually keep that position in most dimensions. The spatial perspective is fundamental to study of regional development. For this reason, the next objective is the analysis of differences by spatial location using the variance analysis. The general indicator shows significant differences between EU countries but it does not show differences in the quality of life of European citizens in urban and rural areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prague Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prague Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.783\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prague Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是开发主观综合指标,量化欧盟28国不同国家的生活质量,数据来自2016年欧洲生活质量调查(EQLS)。由于质量生活的多维性,我们在一般综合指标的基础上增加了其他指标,以便量化质量生活的不同维度。主成分分析和Mazziota-Pareto分析的连续但不受约束的应用使我们能够对生活质量的5个维度进行分类:治理的主观成分、公共服务、环境、对生活的总体满意度和社会经济问题。我们证实,在总指数中排名最低或最高的国家通常在大多数方面都保持这一位置。空间视角是研究区域发展的基础。出于这个原因,下一个目标是使用方差分析按空间位置分析差异。总体指标显示欧盟国家之间存在显著差异,但没有显示城市和农村地区欧洲公民生活质量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Subjective Life in the EU: Rural and Urban Areas
The aim of this paper is to develop subjective synthetic indicators that quantify the quality of life in the different countries of the EU-28, with data from the 2016 European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). We add other indicators to the general synthetic ones in order to quantify the different dimensions of quality life due to its multidimensional nature. The successive but unchained application of the principal component analysis and the Mazziota-Pareto analysis allows us to classify 5 dimensions of quality of life: subjective component of governance, public services, environment, general satisfaction with life, and socioeconomic issues. We verify that countries with the lowest or highest positions in the general index usually keep that position in most dimensions. The spatial perspective is fundamental to study of regional development. For this reason, the next objective is the analysis of differences by spatial location using the variance analysis. The general indicator shows significant differences between EU countries but it does not show differences in the quality of life of European citizens in urban and rural areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Effects of Demographic Change on Economic Growth: A Panel ARDL Approach for Selected OECD Countries Analysis of Comovement Between China's Commodity Futures and World Crude Oil Prices Determinants of Sustainable Financial Inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa: A System GMM Approach CAT Bonds: A Suitable Systemic Approach for Handling Catastrophic Risks in the Czech Republic? Does Urban Greening Construction Promote Technological Innovation of Enterprises? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1