信息、虚假信息和假新闻

J. Revez, L. Corujo
{"title":"信息、虚假信息和假新闻","authors":"J. Revez, L. Corujo","doi":"10.14195/2182-7974_extra2022_1_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study’s purpose is to systematically review the literature to identify the most recent library practices against fake news. Previous findings showed most studies emphasize academic libraries practices and are mainly focused on information literacy instruction. This article updates prior research aiming to acknowledge the tangible practices of libraries, discuss their efficiency, and continue a categorization of those practices. It was performed a systematic literature review of the last 12 months (October 2020-September 2021) to retrieve the most recent library practices. After the extraction, with a final set of 17 documents, a multi-step qualitative analysis, and a categorization were developed. The current debate is still around information literacy strategies that intend to reiterate an authority-based source evaluation versus the challenge to recognize an emotional-based reaction to fake news in a post-truth world. The role of libraries is cornered in an instructional framework, while disinformation is pervasive in several information ecosystems. The role of libraries in a Post-truth society is still an open debate, yet there is almost a consensus that libraries should engage in partnerships and be part of a multidisciplinary approach.","PeriodicalId":40452,"journal":{"name":"Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infodemic, disinformation and fake news\",\"authors\":\"J. Revez, L. Corujo\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2182-7974_extra2022_1_2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study’s purpose is to systematically review the literature to identify the most recent library practices against fake news. Previous findings showed most studies emphasize academic libraries practices and are mainly focused on information literacy instruction. This article updates prior research aiming to acknowledge the tangible practices of libraries, discuss their efficiency, and continue a categorization of those practices. It was performed a systematic literature review of the last 12 months (October 2020-September 2021) to retrieve the most recent library practices. After the extraction, with a final set of 17 documents, a multi-step qualitative analysis, and a categorization were developed. The current debate is still around information literacy strategies that intend to reiterate an authority-based source evaluation versus the challenge to recognize an emotional-based reaction to fake news in a post-truth world. The role of libraries is cornered in an instructional framework, while disinformation is pervasive in several information ecosystems. The role of libraries in a Post-truth society is still an open debate, yet there is almost a consensus that libraries should engage in partnerships and be part of a multidisciplinary approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-7974_extra2022_1_2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletim do Arquivo da Universidade de Coimbra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-7974_extra2022_1_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是系统地回顾文献,以确定图书馆最近针对假新闻的做法。先前的研究结果表明,大多数研究强调学术图书馆的实践,主要关注信息素养教学。本文更新了先前的研究,旨在承认图书馆的实际做法,讨论其效率,并继续对这些做法进行分类。对过去12个月(2020年10月至2021年9月)进行了系统的文献综述,以检索最新的图书馆实践。提取后,最后一组17份文件,进行了多步骤定性分析和分类。目前的辩论仍然围绕着信息素养策略展开,这些策略旨在重申基于权威的来源评估,而不是在后真相世界中识别对假新闻的基于情感的反应。图书馆的作用被困在教学框架中,而虚假信息在几个信息生态系统中普遍存在。图书馆在后真相社会中的作用仍然是一个公开的辩论,但人们几乎一致认为,图书馆应该建立伙伴关系,并成为多学科方法的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infodemic, disinformation and fake news
This study’s purpose is to systematically review the literature to identify the most recent library practices against fake news. Previous findings showed most studies emphasize academic libraries practices and are mainly focused on information literacy instruction. This article updates prior research aiming to acknowledge the tangible practices of libraries, discuss their efficiency, and continue a categorization of those practices. It was performed a systematic literature review of the last 12 months (October 2020-September 2021) to retrieve the most recent library practices. After the extraction, with a final set of 17 documents, a multi-step qualitative analysis, and a categorization were developed. The current debate is still around information literacy strategies that intend to reiterate an authority-based source evaluation versus the challenge to recognize an emotional-based reaction to fake news in a post-truth world. The role of libraries is cornered in an instructional framework, while disinformation is pervasive in several information ecosystems. The role of libraries in a Post-truth society is still an open debate, yet there is almost a consensus that libraries should engage in partnerships and be part of a multidisciplinary approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Archive of the University of Coimbra is published twice a year and it is dedicated to the issue of papers and research in the areas of Archivology and History, giving preference to the existing funds at the Archive of the University of Coimbra. Aims to stimulate the multidisciplinary discussion within the Information Science and History and to publicize the activity in these areas developed in Portugal and in particular at the referred Archive. The Bulletin had its first issue in 1973, and from the present (Vol. XXV, 2012), is replaced by online edition only, and is open to collaboration with national and foreign researchers.
期刊最新文献
As evidências documentais da gestão urbanística em Portugal A demografia do Porto no início da Idade Moderna O arquivo do Pontifício e Real Colégio de São Pedro (1545-1834) Nota de apresentação Um Debate a três conceitos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1