模拟/数字国际关系中的和平

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Global Change Peace & Security Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370
Oliver P. Richmond
{"title":"模拟/数字国际关系中的和平","authors":"Oliver P. Richmond","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article outlines a preliminary perspective of peace in IR resting on analogue and digital versions in mainstream and critical forms. It discusses their implications for long standing key debates in the discipline about war and peace. It argues that digital IR/ international relations were initially thought to be a breakthrough for global civil society and rights, which promised a more emancipatory form of peace by allowing individuals and civil society to challenge power structures more effectively, and by curtailing the bounding effects of territorialism, sovereignty and nationalism. This gave critical forms of agency space to network. However, a brewing ‘counter-revolution’ of what might be now called the ‘ancien regime’ once again, points to digital forms of governmentality, which replicates the liberal and neoliberal governmentalities of the last few decades. This may make the analogue ‘liberal peace’ look like a virtuous high-water mark in recent history. Furthermore, a digital version of peace has yet to be developed.","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":"32 1","pages":"317 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peace in Analogue/ Digital International Relations\",\"authors\":\"Oliver P. Richmond\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article outlines a preliminary perspective of peace in IR resting on analogue and digital versions in mainstream and critical forms. It discusses their implications for long standing key debates in the discipline about war and peace. It argues that digital IR/ international relations were initially thought to be a breakthrough for global civil society and rights, which promised a more emancipatory form of peace by allowing individuals and civil society to challenge power structures more effectively, and by curtailing the bounding effects of territorialism, sovereignty and nationalism. This gave critical forms of agency space to network. However, a brewing ‘counter-revolution’ of what might be now called the ‘ancien regime’ once again, points to digital forms of governmentality, which replicates the liberal and neoliberal governmentalities of the last few decades. This may make the analogue ‘liberal peace’ look like a virtuous high-water mark in recent history. Furthermore, a digital version of peace has yet to be developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"317 - 336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1825370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要本文概述了基于主流和批判性形式的模拟和数字版本的IR和平的初步视角。它讨论了它们对战争与和平学科中长期存在的关键辩论的影响。它认为,数字IR/国际关系最初被认为是全球公民社会和权利的突破,通过允许个人和公民社会更有效地挑战权力结构,并通过遏制领土主义、主权和民族主义的边界效应,承诺了一种更解放的和平形式。这为网络提供了关键形式的代理空间。然而,一场酝酿中的“反革命”——现在可能被称为“旧政权”——再次指向了数字形式的政府心态,它复制了过去几十年的自由主义和新自由主义政府心态。这可能会使类似的“自由和平”看起来像是近代史上的一个良性高潮。此外,和平的数字版本尚待开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peace in Analogue/ Digital International Relations
ABSTRACT This article outlines a preliminary perspective of peace in IR resting on analogue and digital versions in mainstream and critical forms. It discusses their implications for long standing key debates in the discipline about war and peace. It argues that digital IR/ international relations were initially thought to be a breakthrough for global civil society and rights, which promised a more emancipatory form of peace by allowing individuals and civil society to challenge power structures more effectively, and by curtailing the bounding effects of territorialism, sovereignty and nationalism. This gave critical forms of agency space to network. However, a brewing ‘counter-revolution’ of what might be now called the ‘ancien regime’ once again, points to digital forms of governmentality, which replicates the liberal and neoliberal governmentalities of the last few decades. This may make the analogue ‘liberal peace’ look like a virtuous high-water mark in recent history. Furthermore, a digital version of peace has yet to be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Change Peace & Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Mujeres y discursos de paz en la historiaBy María Elena DíezJorge, Cándida MartínezLópez (Eds.). Berlin: Peter Lang, 2023. ISBN 978‐3‐631‐88221‐4 An Army Afire: How the US Army Confronted its Racial Crisis in the Vietnam Era By BethBailey. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2023 Unofficial Peace Diplomacy: Private Peace Entrepreneurs in Conflict Resolution ProcessesBy LiorLehrs. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2022 Six Stops on the National Security Tour: Rethinking warfare economiesMiriamPemberton, New York: Routledge. 2022 Virtual prayers and real violence: Religion as a resource in challenging times
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1