加拿大职业表现测量在意大利帕金森病患者中的验证

Edoardo Bianchini, F. Della Gatta, Miriam Virgilio, M. Alborghetti, M. Salvetti, Franco Giubilei, F. Pontieri
{"title":"加拿大职业表现测量在意大利帕金森病患者中的验证","authors":"Edoardo Bianchini, F. Della Gatta, Miriam Virgilio, M. Alborghetti, M. Salvetti, Franco Giubilei, F. Pontieri","doi":"10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims To assess internal consistency, validity and test–retest reliability of Italian version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) clients. Methods Sixty-one subjects completed COPM at baseline, 45 attended re-test within 10 days. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were determined on average satisfaction and performance scores. Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale and MDS-Unified-Parkinson’s-Disease-Rating-Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) were used to evaluate disease severity and construct validity. Results COPM showed moderate-high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.684 for performance and 0.805 for satisfaction). Test–retest reliability was moderate for both performance and satisfaction scores (ICC values 0.545 – CI95% 0.307–0.720, and 0.693 – CI 95% 0.506–0.819, respectively). COPM did not demonstrate significant correlation with H&Y nor MDS-UPDRS-III. Conclusions COPM is a valid and reliable tool promoting client-centered approach in PD. The role of the client in assessing needs and defining priority outcomes may increase compliance to intervention and awareness of occupational performance.","PeriodicalId":45387,"journal":{"name":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in Italian Parkinson’s Disease Clients\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Bianchini, F. Della Gatta, Miriam Virgilio, M. Alborghetti, M. Salvetti, Franco Giubilei, F. Pontieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aims To assess internal consistency, validity and test–retest reliability of Italian version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) clients. Methods Sixty-one subjects completed COPM at baseline, 45 attended re-test within 10 days. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were determined on average satisfaction and performance scores. Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale and MDS-Unified-Parkinson’s-Disease-Rating-Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) were used to evaluate disease severity and construct validity. Results COPM showed moderate-high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.684 for performance and 0.805 for satisfaction). Test–retest reliability was moderate for both performance and satisfaction scores (ICC values 0.545 – CI95% 0.307–0.720, and 0.693 – CI 95% 0.506–0.819, respectively). COPM did not demonstrate significant correlation with H&Y nor MDS-UPDRS-III. Conclusions COPM is a valid and reliable tool promoting client-centered approach in PD. The role of the client in assessing needs and defining priority outcomes may increase compliance to intervention and awareness of occupational performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2021.1942392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要目的评估意大利版加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)在帕金森病(PD)患者中的内部一致性、有效性和测试-再测试可靠性。方法61名受试者在基线时完成了COPM,45人在10天内参加了复试 天。内部一致性和测试-再测试的可靠性是根据平均满意度和绩效得分确定的。Hoehn和Yahr(H&Y)量表和MDS统一帕金森病评分量表第三部分(MDS-UPDRS-III)用于评估疾病的严重程度和结构有效性。结果COPM显示出中等-高的内部一致性(Cronbachα0.684表示绩效,0.805表示满意度)。性能和满意度得分的测试-再测试可靠性中等(ICC值分别为0.545–CI95%0.307–0.720和0.693–CI95%0.506–0.819)。COPM与H&Y和MDS-UPDRS-III均未显示出显著相关性。结论COPM是一种有效可靠的工具,可促进PD中以客户为中心的方法。客户在评估需求和确定优先结果方面的作用可能会提高对干预的依从性和对职业表现的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in Italian Parkinson’s Disease Clients
Abstract Aims To assess internal consistency, validity and test–retest reliability of Italian version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) clients. Methods Sixty-one subjects completed COPM at baseline, 45 attended re-test within 10 days. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were determined on average satisfaction and performance scores. Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale and MDS-Unified-Parkinson’s-Disease-Rating-Scale-part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) were used to evaluate disease severity and construct validity. Results COPM showed moderate-high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.684 for performance and 0.805 for satisfaction). Test–retest reliability was moderate for both performance and satisfaction scores (ICC values 0.545 – CI95% 0.307–0.720, and 0.693 – CI 95% 0.506–0.819, respectively). COPM did not demonstrate significant correlation with H&Y nor MDS-UPDRS-III. Conclusions COPM is a valid and reliable tool promoting client-centered approach in PD. The role of the client in assessing needs and defining priority outcomes may increase compliance to intervention and awareness of occupational performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: This comprehensive journal is recognized for its useful balance of research and clinical practice articles. For more than twenty five years Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics has functioned as a forum for allied health professionals as well as others with a focus on rehabilitation of the geriatric client to share information, clinical experience, research, and therapeutic practice. Each issue focuses on current practice and emerging issues in the care of the older client, including rehabilitation and long-term care in institutional and community settings, and innovative programming; the entire range of problems experienced by the elderly; and the current skills needed for working with older clients.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Autonomic Modulation and Lower Limbs Resistance Exercise in Healthy Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study Punching Parkinson’s: The Experience of No-Contact Boxing among Older Adults Living with Parkinson’s Disease The Prompt Impact of Health Promotion Activities by Utilizing Online Group Exercises on Community-Dwelling Older People with Psychological Depression The Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Physical Activity in Rehabilitation Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Do Personality Traits Predict Mobility Outcomes among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Nigeria?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1