大型Scopus数据集及其决策分析

Q1 Decision Sciences Annals of Data Science Pub Date : 2022-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s40745-022-00435-3
Prem Kumar Singh
{"title":"大型Scopus数据集及其决策分析","authors":"Prem Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1007/s40745-022-00435-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently several authors paid attention towards Scopus Data analysis for intellectual measurement of institutes or authors. It is well known that the SCOPUS contains more than 34,346 peer reviewed Journals from different subjects with 3 lakh conferences. It is difficult to measure the performance or expertise of any institute or author in the given domain for admission, job, and ranking or other decision making process. The reason is several manipulations started in document and citation count via strategic authors or institute which can be measured via average author publications, number of funding, collaborations and retracted papers. It is happening due to rogue editor or business strategic of educationalist for profit. However these types of misconduct impacts lot to real researcher which forces brain drain. To resolve this issue, the current paper provides a way to measure the intellectual achievement of an institute or author based on several metrics. The proposed method is illustrated using the SCOPUS data sets and it’s metric for critical understanding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Scopus Data Sets and Its Analysis for Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"Prem Kumar Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40745-022-00435-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recently several authors paid attention towards Scopus Data analysis for intellectual measurement of institutes or authors. It is well known that the SCOPUS contains more than 34,346 peer reviewed Journals from different subjects with 3 lakh conferences. It is difficult to measure the performance or expertise of any institute or author in the given domain for admission, job, and ranking or other decision making process. The reason is several manipulations started in document and citation count via strategic authors or institute which can be measured via average author publications, number of funding, collaborations and retracted papers. It is happening due to rogue editor or business strategic of educationalist for profit. However these types of misconduct impacts lot to real researcher which forces brain drain. To resolve this issue, the current paper provides a way to measure the intellectual achievement of an institute or author based on several metrics. The proposed method is illustrated using the SCOPUS data sets and it’s metric for critical understanding.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00435-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00435-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,一些作者开始关注 Scopus 数据分析,以衡量机构或作者的智力水平。众所周知,SCOPUS 包含超过 34346 种不同学科的同行评审期刊和 30 万个会议。在招生、就业、排名或其他决策过程中,很难衡量任何机构或作者在特定领域的表现或专业技能。究其原因,是一些人开始通过战略作者或机构对文献和引用次数进行操纵,而这可以通过作者平均发表论文量、资助数量、合作和被撤论文数量来衡量。这种情况的发生是由于流氓编辑或教育家的商业策略牟利所致。然而,这些类型的不当行为对真正的研究人员造成了很大影响,迫使人才流失。为了解决这个问题,本文提供了一种基于多个指标来衡量机构或作者智力成就的方法。本文使用 SCOPUS 数据集及其度量标准对所提出的方法进行了说明,以帮助读者更好地理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Large Scopus Data Sets and Its Analysis for Decision Making

Recently several authors paid attention towards Scopus Data analysis for intellectual measurement of institutes or authors. It is well known that the SCOPUS contains more than 34,346 peer reviewed Journals from different subjects with 3 lakh conferences. It is difficult to measure the performance or expertise of any institute or author in the given domain for admission, job, and ranking or other decision making process. The reason is several manipulations started in document and citation count via strategic authors or institute which can be measured via average author publications, number of funding, collaborations and retracted papers. It is happening due to rogue editor or business strategic of educationalist for profit. However these types of misconduct impacts lot to real researcher which forces brain drain. To resolve this issue, the current paper provides a way to measure the intellectual achievement of an institute or author based on several metrics. The proposed method is illustrated using the SCOPUS data sets and it’s metric for critical understanding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
期刊最新文献
Non-negative Sparse Matrix Factorization for Soft Clustering of Territory Risk Analysis Kernel Method for Estimating Matusita Overlapping Coefficient Using Numerical Approximations Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Generalized Inflated Power Series Distributions Farm-Level Smart Crop Recommendation Framework Using Machine Learning Reaction Function for Financial Market Reacting to Events or Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1