前房深度对中国人眼术后屈光效果的影响

Rachel Shet Hui Wong, K. Ong
{"title":"前房深度对中国人眼术后屈光效果的影响","authors":"Rachel Shet Hui Wong, K. Ong","doi":"10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim or Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the refractive surprise (RS) after cataract surgery with various intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes with very shallow or deep anterior chamber depth (ACD). \nDesign: This is a prospective cohort study of patients from a private ophthalmology practice in Sydney. \nMethods: Thirty-one patients who had their cataract surgery in 2014 were included. The cohort consists of 20 eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm and 25 eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm. Patients’ demographic variables and their predicted refractive outcomes using the SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 IOL formulas were collected. Actual refractive outcomes were obtained from consultations at least one-month postoperatively. RS was calculated from the difference between predicted refraction outcome of IOL formulas and the actual postoperative refraction achieved. \nResults: The linear correlations between ACD and RS were not significant (p > 0.05). In the group with ACD < 2.8 mm, the mean refractive surprise using SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 formulas were -0.191 ± 0.541, -0.189 ± 0.444, -0.201 ± 0.449, and -0.154 ± 0.489 D, respectively. In the group with ACD > 3.2 mm, the mean refractive surprise using the IOL formulas were -1.364 ± 0.541, -1.420 ± 0.541, 0.027 ± 0.394, and -0.045 ± 0.343 D, respectively.  \nConclusion: The positive linear correlation between ACD and RS was weak. In eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm, the least RS was found with the Holladay 2 formula, while in eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm, this was found with Holladay 1.","PeriodicalId":39864,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of anterior chamber depth on postoperative refractive outcome in Chinese eyes\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Shet Hui Wong, K. Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim or Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the refractive surprise (RS) after cataract surgery with various intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes with very shallow or deep anterior chamber depth (ACD). \\nDesign: This is a prospective cohort study of patients from a private ophthalmology practice in Sydney. \\nMethods: Thirty-one patients who had their cataract surgery in 2014 were included. The cohort consists of 20 eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm and 25 eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm. Patients’ demographic variables and their predicted refractive outcomes using the SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 IOL formulas were collected. Actual refractive outcomes were obtained from consultations at least one-month postoperatively. RS was calculated from the difference between predicted refraction outcome of IOL formulas and the actual postoperative refraction achieved. \\nResults: The linear correlations between ACD and RS were not significant (p > 0.05). In the group with ACD < 2.8 mm, the mean refractive surprise using SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 formulas were -0.191 ± 0.541, -0.189 ± 0.444, -0.201 ± 0.449, and -0.154 ± 0.489 D, respectively. In the group with ACD > 3.2 mm, the mean refractive surprise using the IOL formulas were -1.364 ± 0.541, -1.420 ± 0.541, 0.027 ± 0.394, and -0.045 ± 0.343 D, respectively.  \\nConclusion: The positive linear correlation between ACD and RS was weak. In eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm, the least RS was found with the Holladay 2 formula, while in eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm, this was found with Holladay 1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/asjoo.v16i2.366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评价前房深度极浅或极深眼白内障术后不同人工晶状体(IOL)配方的屈光意外(RS)。设计:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,患者来自悉尼一家私人眼科诊所。方法:选取2014年行白内障手术的患者31例。该队列包括ACD < 2.8 mm的20只眼和ACD > 3.2 mm的25只眼。使用SRK-T、Haigis、Holladay 1和Holladay 2人工晶状体公式收集患者的人口统计学变量及其预测屈光结果。实际屈光结果是通过术后至少一个月的会诊获得的。RS由人工晶状体配方预测屈光度与术后实际屈光度之差计算。结果:ACD与RS之间线性相关无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在ACD < 2.8 mm组,使用SRK-T、Haigis、Holladay 1、Holladay 2公式的平均屈光惊奇D分别为-0.191±0.541、-0.189±0.444、-0.201±0.449、-0.154±0.489 D。ACD为3.2 mm组的平均屈光惊奇分别为-1.364±0.541、-1.420±0.541、0.027±0.394和-0.045±0.343 D。结论:ACD与RS呈弱线性正相关。在ACD < 2.8 mm的眼睛中,Holladay 2配方的RS最小,而在ACD≤3.2 mm的眼睛中,Holladay 1配方的RS最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of anterior chamber depth on postoperative refractive outcome in Chinese eyes
Aim or Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the refractive surprise (RS) after cataract surgery with various intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in eyes with very shallow or deep anterior chamber depth (ACD). Design: This is a prospective cohort study of patients from a private ophthalmology practice in Sydney. Methods: Thirty-one patients who had their cataract surgery in 2014 were included. The cohort consists of 20 eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm and 25 eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm. Patients’ demographic variables and their predicted refractive outcomes using the SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 IOL formulas were collected. Actual refractive outcomes were obtained from consultations at least one-month postoperatively. RS was calculated from the difference between predicted refraction outcome of IOL formulas and the actual postoperative refraction achieved. Results: The linear correlations between ACD and RS were not significant (p > 0.05). In the group with ACD < 2.8 mm, the mean refractive surprise using SRK-T, Haigis, Holladay 1, and Holladay 2 formulas were -0.191 ± 0.541, -0.189 ± 0.444, -0.201 ± 0.449, and -0.154 ± 0.489 D, respectively. In the group with ACD > 3.2 mm, the mean refractive surprise using the IOL formulas were -1.364 ± 0.541, -1.420 ± 0.541, 0.027 ± 0.394, and -0.045 ± 0.343 D, respectively.  Conclusion: The positive linear correlation between ACD and RS was weak. In eyes with ACD < 2.8 mm, the least RS was found with the Holladay 2 formula, while in eyes with ACD > 3.2 mm, this was found with Holladay 1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is the official peer-reviewed journal of the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group (SEAGIG) and is indexed in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is published quarterly (four [4] issues per year) by Scientific Communications International Limited. The journal is published on-line only and is distributed free of cost via the SEAGIG website.
期刊最新文献
Is zero incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery achievable Is indiscriminate use of intracameral prophylactic antibiotics in cataract surgery appropriate Ultrasound monitoring for minocyclineinduced idiopathic intracranial hypertension Subconjunctival antibiotics: an alternative to intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery Changes in practice guidelines and regulations in ophthalmology due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1