保存音乐教师edTPA作品集的批判性考察

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Music Teacher Education Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10570837211048407
Cynthia L. Wagoner, Jay Juchniewicz
{"title":"保存音乐教师edTPA作品集的批判性考察","authors":"Cynthia L. Wagoner, Jay Juchniewicz","doi":"10.1177/10570837211048407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between participants’ edTPA writing and edTPA portfolio scores. Specific questions included (a) Is there a relationship between overall word count and total score on the edTPA? (b) Are individual task commentary word counts associated with specific task scores and total edTPA scores? and (c) Is there a relationship between edTPA-specific vocabulary and total score on the edTPA? Written artifacts from 67 music education students who completed the K–12 Performing Arts edTPA Portfolio were collected over a 4-year period. Correlations between word counts and task and total scores were positive and of modest to moderate strength, as was the correlation between edTPA vocabulary word use and total scores. These findings are interpreted in relation to a national K–12 Performing Arts edTPA portfolio average score of 45 and existing edTPA policies affecting music teacher education programs.","PeriodicalId":44687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Teacher Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"69 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Examination of Preservice Music Teachers’ Writing on the edTPA Portfolio\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia L. Wagoner, Jay Juchniewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10570837211048407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between participants’ edTPA writing and edTPA portfolio scores. Specific questions included (a) Is there a relationship between overall word count and total score on the edTPA? (b) Are individual task commentary word counts associated with specific task scores and total edTPA scores? and (c) Is there a relationship between edTPA-specific vocabulary and total score on the edTPA? Written artifacts from 67 music education students who completed the K–12 Performing Arts edTPA Portfolio were collected over a 4-year period. Correlations between word counts and task and total scores were positive and of modest to moderate strength, as was the correlation between edTPA vocabulary word use and total scores. These findings are interpreted in relation to a national K–12 Performing Arts edTPA portfolio average score of 45 and existing edTPA policies affecting music teacher education programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Music Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Music Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837211048407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837211048407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检验参与者的edTPA写作与edTPA投资组合得分之间的关系。具体问题包括(a)在edTPA上,单词总数和总分之间是否存在关系?(b) 个别任务评论字数是否与特定任务得分和edTPA总分相关?以及(c)edTPA特定词汇与edTPA总分之间是否存在关系?67名完成K-12表演艺术edTPA作品集的音乐教育学生的书面作品在4年的时间里被收集。单词计数与任务和总分之间的相关性是正的,并且具有中等强度,edTPA词汇使用与总分之间的相关也是如此。这些发现与国家K-12表演艺术edTPA组合的平均得分45分以及影响音乐教师教育项目的现有edTPA政策有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Examination of Preservice Music Teachers’ Writing on the edTPA Portfolio
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between participants’ edTPA writing and edTPA portfolio scores. Specific questions included (a) Is there a relationship between overall word count and total score on the edTPA? (b) Are individual task commentary word counts associated with specific task scores and total edTPA scores? and (c) Is there a relationship between edTPA-specific vocabulary and total score on the edTPA? Written artifacts from 67 music education students who completed the K–12 Performing Arts edTPA Portfolio were collected over a 4-year period. Correlations between word counts and task and total scores were positive and of modest to moderate strength, as was the correlation between edTPA vocabulary word use and total scores. These findings are interpreted in relation to a national K–12 Performing Arts edTPA portfolio average score of 45 and existing edTPA policies affecting music teacher education programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Teacher Education
Journal of Music Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
41.70%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Online Social Comparison and Impostor Phenomenon Among Music Education Undergraduates “I Want to Be a Better Person and a Better Teacher”: Exploring the Constructs of Race and Dis/ability in a Music Educator Collaborative Teacher Study Group Intro to What? Interrogating Introduction to Music Education Courses Preservice Music Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Contexts Perspectives and Expertise of Secondary Ensemble Music Educators With ADHD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1