土耳其不育夫妇的抑郁和焦虑状况

M. Kazandi, Ozlem Gunday, T. Mermer, Nuray Erturk, E. Ozkınay
{"title":"土耳其不育夫妇的抑郁和焦虑状况","authors":"M. Kazandi, Ozlem Gunday, T. Mermer, Nuray Erturk, E. Ozkınay","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v9i2.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infertility is a major psychosocial crisis as well as being a medical problem. The factors that predict psychosocial consequences of infertility may vary in different gender and different infertile populations. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether Turkish infertile couples had higher levels of depression and anxiety when compared to non-infertile couples. Our secondary aim was to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and levels of depression and anxiety in Turkish infertile couples. Materials and Methods: We designed a descriptive cross sectional study of 248 infertile women and 96 infertile men with no psychiatric disturbance and 51 women and 40 men who have children to evaluate the depression and anxiety levels between infertile couples and fertile couples. A gynecologist evaluated participants for demographic data and then they were visited by a psychologist to perform questionnaire scales which were The Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for the evaluation of the degree of psychopathology. The data were statistically analyzed, with p<0.05 as the level of statistical significance. Results: We observed significant differences between the infertile couples and fertile couples with respect to state and trait anxiety (p<0.0001) while no difference was regarding with depression, both of women and men. Anxiety and depression were observed as independent from gender when infertile women and men were compared (p=0.213). Conclusion: We believed that the psychological management at infertile couples must be individualized with cultural, religious, and class related aspects.","PeriodicalId":14673,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples\",\"authors\":\"M. Kazandi, Ozlem Gunday, T. Mermer, Nuray Erturk, E. Ozkınay\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijrm.v9i2.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Infertility is a major psychosocial crisis as well as being a medical problem. The factors that predict psychosocial consequences of infertility may vary in different gender and different infertile populations. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether Turkish infertile couples had higher levels of depression and anxiety when compared to non-infertile couples. Our secondary aim was to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and levels of depression and anxiety in Turkish infertile couples. Materials and Methods: We designed a descriptive cross sectional study of 248 infertile women and 96 infertile men with no psychiatric disturbance and 51 women and 40 men who have children to evaluate the depression and anxiety levels between infertile couples and fertile couples. A gynecologist evaluated participants for demographic data and then they were visited by a psychologist to perform questionnaire scales which were The Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for the evaluation of the degree of psychopathology. The data were statistically analyzed, with p<0.05 as the level of statistical significance. Results: We observed significant differences between the infertile couples and fertile couples with respect to state and trait anxiety (p<0.0001) while no difference was regarding with depression, both of women and men. Anxiety and depression were observed as independent from gender when infertile women and men were compared (p=0.213). Conclusion: We believed that the psychological management at infertile couples must be individualized with cultural, religious, and class related aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v9i2.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v9i2.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

背景:不孕不育是一个主要的社会心理危机,也是一个医学问题。预测不孕心理社会后果的因素在不同性别和不同不孕人群中可能有所不同。目的:本研究的主要目的是调查土耳其不孕夫妇与非不孕夫妇相比是否有更高水平的抑郁和焦虑。我们的第二个目的是评估土耳其不孕夫妇的社会人口学特征与抑郁和焦虑水平之间的关系。材料和方法:我们设计了一项描述性的横断面研究,对248名不孕妇女和96名没有精神障碍的不孕男子以及51名有孩子的妇女和40名有子女的男子进行研究,以评估不孕夫妇和可生育夫妇之间的抑郁和焦虑水平。一名妇科医生评估了参与者的人口统计数据,然后由一名心理学家访问他们,对他们进行问卷调查,即贝克抑郁量表和状态特质焦虑量表,以评估精神病理学的程度。对数据进行统计学分析,统计学显著性水平为p<0.05。结果:我们观察到不孕夫妇和有生育能力的夫妇在状态和特质焦虑方面存在显著差异(p<0.0001),而女性和男性在抑郁方面没有差异。在比较不孕妇女和男性时,焦虑和抑郁与性别无关(p=0.0213)。结论:我们认为不孕夫妇的心理管理必须从文化、宗教和阶级相关方面进行个性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples
Background: Infertility is a major psychosocial crisis as well as being a medical problem. The factors that predict psychosocial consequences of infertility may vary in different gender and different infertile populations. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether Turkish infertile couples had higher levels of depression and anxiety when compared to non-infertile couples. Our secondary aim was to evaluate the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and levels of depression and anxiety in Turkish infertile couples. Materials and Methods: We designed a descriptive cross sectional study of 248 infertile women and 96 infertile men with no psychiatric disturbance and 51 women and 40 men who have children to evaluate the depression and anxiety levels between infertile couples and fertile couples. A gynecologist evaluated participants for demographic data and then they were visited by a psychologist to perform questionnaire scales which were The Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for the evaluation of the degree of psychopathology. The data were statistically analyzed, with p<0.05 as the level of statistical significance. Results: We observed significant differences between the infertile couples and fertile couples with respect to state and trait anxiety (p<0.0001) while no difference was regarding with depression, both of women and men. Anxiety and depression were observed as independent from gender when infertile women and men were compared (p=0.213). Conclusion: We believed that the psychological management at infertile couples must be individualized with cultural, religious, and class related aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples Vaginal compared oral administration of estradiol in women with thin endometrium: A cross-sectional study Corrigendum to “Interstitial ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by three-dimensional ultrasound and its laparoscopic management: A case report” [Int J Reprod BioMed 2019; 17: 945-950] A new strategy and system for the ex vivo ovary perfusion and cryopreservation: An innovation The etiologies of DNA abnormalities in male infertility: An assessment and review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1