无法表达/无法表达的语言:追踪种族主义的方法论开放和关键策略

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Research & Method in Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043843
Cee Carter, Korina M. Jocson
{"title":"无法表达/无法表达的语言:追踪种族主义的方法论开放和关键策略","authors":"Cee Carter, Korina M. Jocson","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Race theories generate method-making and onto-epistemological connections central to inquiry. In this article, the authors share a conversation that created methodological openings about what constitutes ‘racially just’ in this particular moment of qualitative research. Is the call for ‘racially just’ a form of disruption or rupture? Is it a logic of inclusion, or a logic of obliteration? While the racial character of knowledge systems has become more explicit, it is important to consider how the analytics of raciality, a social scientific apparatus that produces racial subjugation, is already configured and entangled within sociopolitical systems. Following the work of Denise Ferreira da Silva, the authors argue that attention to raciality requires a different set of critical strategies for troubling ‘racially just’ approaches in the name of racial justice, asking more of themselves, of each other, and of their collective aims to unsettle colonial and racial logics within and outside of higher education institutions. The potential for transforming research practises and the teaching of research methods, by building on radical women of colour feminisms, are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Untaming/untameable tongues: methodological openings and critical strategies for tracing raciality\",\"authors\":\"Cee Carter, Korina M. Jocson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Race theories generate method-making and onto-epistemological connections central to inquiry. In this article, the authors share a conversation that created methodological openings about what constitutes ‘racially just’ in this particular moment of qualitative research. Is the call for ‘racially just’ a form of disruption or rupture? Is it a logic of inclusion, or a logic of obliteration? While the racial character of knowledge systems has become more explicit, it is important to consider how the analytics of raciality, a social scientific apparatus that produces racial subjugation, is already configured and entangled within sociopolitical systems. Following the work of Denise Ferreira da Silva, the authors argue that attention to raciality requires a different set of critical strategies for troubling ‘racially just’ approaches in the name of racial justice, asking more of themselves, of each other, and of their collective aims to unsettle colonial and racial logics within and outside of higher education institutions. The potential for transforming research practises and the teaching of research methods, by building on radical women of colour feminisms, are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2043843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:种族理论产生了方法制定,并建立了探究的核心认识论联系。在这篇文章中,作者们分享了一段对话,这段对话为在这一特定的定性研究时刻,什么是“种族公正”创造了方法上的机会。对“种族歧视”的呼吁是一种破坏还是破裂?这是一种包容的逻辑,还是一种抹杀的逻辑?虽然知识系统的种族特征变得更加明确,但重要的是要考虑对种族主义的分析,这是一种产生种族征服的社会科学工具,是如何在社会政治系统中配置和纠缠的。继Denise Ferreira da Silva的工作之后,作者们认为,对种族主义的关注需要一套不同的批判策略,以种族正义的名义来扰乱“种族公正”的方法,更多地询问自己、彼此以及他们的集体目标,以扰乱高等教育机构内外的殖民和种族逻辑。还讨论了通过建立激进的有色人种女性主义来转变研究实践和研究方法教学的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Untaming/untameable tongues: methodological openings and critical strategies for tracing raciality
ABSTRACT Race theories generate method-making and onto-epistemological connections central to inquiry. In this article, the authors share a conversation that created methodological openings about what constitutes ‘racially just’ in this particular moment of qualitative research. Is the call for ‘racially just’ a form of disruption or rupture? Is it a logic of inclusion, or a logic of obliteration? While the racial character of knowledge systems has become more explicit, it is important to consider how the analytics of raciality, a social scientific apparatus that produces racial subjugation, is already configured and entangled within sociopolitical systems. Following the work of Denise Ferreira da Silva, the authors argue that attention to raciality requires a different set of critical strategies for troubling ‘racially just’ approaches in the name of racial justice, asking more of themselves, of each other, and of their collective aims to unsettle colonial and racial logics within and outside of higher education institutions. The potential for transforming research practises and the teaching of research methods, by building on radical women of colour feminisms, are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Creating effective research partnerships with rural communities: a community culture framework Socially desirable resources and activities – evaluation of a new scale for the separate measurement of economic and cultural capital in educational research Catalyzing teacher moves in small-group problem solving: a quantitative discourse analysis Qualitative research during the COVID19 pandemic: the impact of remote research on the collaborative production of methodological knowledge Teacher reflection as a research method: using phenomenology to reflect on classroom events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1