善待自己:积极和消极的情绪都可以为自我调节的放纵提供理由

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Self and Identity Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1080/15298868.2023.2244725
William M. Schiavone, M. vanDellen, Abigail C. Knight, Caleigh A. Cullinan
{"title":"善待自己:积极和消极的情绪都可以为自我调节的放纵提供理由","authors":"William M. Schiavone, M. vanDellen, Abigail C. Knight, Caleigh A. Cullinan","doi":"10.1080/15298868.2023.2244725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Temptations are ubiquitous in daily life. In the present studies, we examined reflective justifications for indulging in these temptations. In Study 1, people reported deserving pleasurable activities (at the expense of goal pursuits) after imagining positive events for which they were responsible or negative events for which they were not responsible. In Study 2, participants reported more indulging and less goal progress when they considered negative events if they were given a chance to reflect on their lack of responsibility for those events. Combined, this evidence suggests people might frequently reflect on their experiences in ways that promote indulging.","PeriodicalId":51426,"journal":{"name":"Self and Identity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treat yourself: both positive and negative affect can provide justifications for self-regulatory indulgence\",\"authors\":\"William M. Schiavone, M. vanDellen, Abigail C. Knight, Caleigh A. Cullinan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15298868.2023.2244725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Temptations are ubiquitous in daily life. In the present studies, we examined reflective justifications for indulging in these temptations. In Study 1, people reported deserving pleasurable activities (at the expense of goal pursuits) after imagining positive events for which they were responsible or negative events for which they were not responsible. In Study 2, participants reported more indulging and less goal progress when they considered negative events if they were given a chance to reflect on their lack of responsibility for those events. Combined, this evidence suggests people might frequently reflect on their experiences in ways that promote indulging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Self and Identity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Self and Identity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2244725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Self and Identity","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2244725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日常生活中,诱惑无处不在。在目前的研究中,我们研究了沉迷于这些诱惑的反思理由。在研究1中,人们在想象了他们负责的积极事件或他们不负责的消极事件后,报告了值得愉快的活动(以牺牲目标追求为代价)。在研究2中,如果参与者有机会反思他们对这些负面事件缺乏责任,那么当他们考虑负面事件时,他们会更放纵,更少实现目标。综上所述,这些证据表明,人们可能经常以促进放纵的方式反思自己的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treat yourself: both positive and negative affect can provide justifications for self-regulatory indulgence
ABSTRACT Temptations are ubiquitous in daily life. In the present studies, we examined reflective justifications for indulging in these temptations. In Study 1, people reported deserving pleasurable activities (at the expense of goal pursuits) after imagining positive events for which they were responsible or negative events for which they were not responsible. In Study 2, participants reported more indulging and less goal progress when they considered negative events if they were given a chance to reflect on their lack of responsibility for those events. Combined, this evidence suggests people might frequently reflect on their experiences in ways that promote indulging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Self and Identity
Self and Identity PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Work on self and identity has a special place in the study of human nature, as self-concerns are arguably at the center of individuals" striving for well-being and for making sense of one"s life. Life goals develop and are influenced by one"s view of what one is like, the way one would ideally like to be (or would like to avoid being), as well as one"s perceptions of what is feasible. Furthermore, conceptions of self and the world affect how one"s progress towards these goals is monitored, evaluated, redirected, re-evaluated, and pursued again. Thus, the “self” as a construct has far-reaching implications for behavior, self-esteem, motivation, experience of emotions and the world more broadly, and hence for interpersonal relationships, society, and culture.
期刊最新文献
To change, but not to preserve! Norm conformity following control threat only emerges for change norms but not for status quo norms Threatening sociopolitical contexts negatively affect belonging and motivation among minoritized students The relationships between multiple facets of self-concept clarity and depression Daily levels of perceived context of reception and self-esteem among U.S. Latine university students: The moderating role of normative identity styles Chronic and contextual identity salience: Assessing dual-dimensional salience with the Identity Salience Questionnaire (ISQ)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1