联合力量和话语权的可燃组合:英国工会、社交媒体和反紧缩人民大会(People’s Assembly Against Austerity)

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 ERGONOMICS New Technology Work and Employment Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.1111/ntwe.12236
Torsten Geelan
{"title":"联合力量和话语权的可燃组合:英国工会、社交媒体和反紧缩人民大会(People’s Assembly Against Austerity)","authors":"Torsten Geelan","doi":"10.1111/ntwe.12236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates how the British trade union movement sought to challenge the politics of austerity after the North Atlantic financial crisis of 2008 by founding a union ‐ led coalition: the People's Assembly Against Austerity. To lay the ground for the study, it redefines the concept of discursive power as the capacity of trade unions to influence the public debate by producing and self ‐ mediating frames and circulating them through the mainstream media, the Internet and social media to a mass audience. Data were collected over 3 years (2013 – 2015) using interviews and scraping tweets from Twitter. The findings reveal how the People's Assembly created and sustained a heterogenous coalition through a policy of nonpartisanship and a consensus ‐ driven decentralised network of grassroots local assemblies orchestrated by a national organisation. The article contributes to the literature on trade union revitalisation by demonstrating how combining coalitional and discursive power is a combustible mix that can help revitalise the political influence of trade unions.","PeriodicalId":51550,"journal":{"name":"New Technology Work and Employment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combustible mix of coalitional and discursive power: British trade unions, social media and the People's Assembly Against Austerity\",\"authors\":\"Torsten Geelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ntwe.12236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates how the British trade union movement sought to challenge the politics of austerity after the North Atlantic financial crisis of 2008 by founding a union ‐ led coalition: the People's Assembly Against Austerity. To lay the ground for the study, it redefines the concept of discursive power as the capacity of trade unions to influence the public debate by producing and self ‐ mediating frames and circulating them through the mainstream media, the Internet and social media to a mass audience. Data were collected over 3 years (2013 – 2015) using interviews and scraping tweets from Twitter. The findings reveal how the People's Assembly created and sustained a heterogenous coalition through a policy of nonpartisanship and a consensus ‐ driven decentralised network of grassroots local assemblies orchestrated by a national organisation. The article contributes to the literature on trade union revitalisation by demonstrating how combining coalitional and discursive power is a combustible mix that can help revitalise the political influence of trade unions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Technology Work and Employment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Technology Work and Employment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12236\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Technology Work and Employment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文调查了2008年北大西洋金融危机后,英国工会运动如何通过成立工会领导的联盟——反对紧缩人民大会来挑战紧缩政治。为了为这项研究奠定基础,它将话语权的概念重新定义为工会通过制作和自我调解框架并通过主流媒体、互联网和社交媒体向大众传播来影响公共辩论的能力。数据是在3年(2013-2015年)内通过采访和从推特上抓取推文收集的。研究结果揭示了人民议会是如何通过无党派政策和由国家组织策划的共识驱动的基层地方议会分散网络来创建和维持一个异质联盟的。这篇文章通过展示联盟和话语权的结合是一种易燃的组合,有助于重振工会的政治影响力,为工会振兴文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The combustible mix of coalitional and discursive power: British trade unions, social media and the People's Assembly Against Austerity
This article investigates how the British trade union movement sought to challenge the politics of austerity after the North Atlantic financial crisis of 2008 by founding a union ‐ led coalition: the People's Assembly Against Austerity. To lay the ground for the study, it redefines the concept of discursive power as the capacity of trade unions to influence the public debate by producing and self ‐ mediating frames and circulating them through the mainstream media, the Internet and social media to a mass audience. Data were collected over 3 years (2013 – 2015) using interviews and scraping tweets from Twitter. The findings reveal how the People's Assembly created and sustained a heterogenous coalition through a policy of nonpartisanship and a consensus ‐ driven decentralised network of grassroots local assemblies orchestrated by a national organisation. The article contributes to the literature on trade union revitalisation by demonstrating how combining coalitional and discursive power is a combustible mix that can help revitalise the political influence of trade unions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
15.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: New Technology, Work and Employment presents analysis of the changing contours of technological and organisational systems and processes in order to encourage an enhanced and critical understanding of the dimensions of technological change in the workplace and in employment more generally. The journal is eclectic and invites contributions from across the social sciences, with the primary focus on critical and non-managerial approaches to the subject. It has the aim of publishing papers from perspectives concerned with the changing nature of new technology and workplace and employment relations. The objective of the journal is to promote deeper understanding through conceptual debate firmly rooted in analysis of current practices and sociotechnical change.
期刊最新文献
How to do HRM with numbers? A performative lens on HR metrics, HR analytics and HR algorithms Framing algorithmic management: Constructed antagonism on HR technology websites A tale of two platforms: Habitus as the structuring force of gig workers' experience How education professionals manage personal and professional boundaries when using social technologies ‘Everything now, all the time’: The connectivity paradox and gender equality in the legal profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1