成人心理健康量表(BIEPS-A)在墨西哥样本中的心理测量特性

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista CES Psicologia Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.21615/cesp.5572
R. P. Figuerola-Escoto, David Luna, M. A. Lezana-Fernández, F. Meneses-González
{"title":"成人心理健康量表(BIEPS-A)在墨西哥样本中的心理测量特性","authors":"R. P. Figuerola-Escoto, David Luna, M. A. Lezana-Fernández, F. Meneses-González","doi":"10.21615/cesp.5572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Psychological well-being favors the functioning of personal and social life. Valid and reliable instruments are necessary for its evaluation that allow deciding and assessing the actions necessary to promote it. Objective. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Scale of Psychological Well-being for Adults (BIEPS-A) in a Mexican sample. Methods: The BIEPS-A scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) were administered to 188 university students and 94 participants from the general population. Results: A parallel analysis detected a single factor in the BIEPS-A scale, structured by exploratory factor analysis (main components, oblique rotation) that retained 9 items and explained 54% of the variance. Internal consistency ranged from acceptable (Cronbach's α = .78) to high (ordinal alpha = .90). ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off point equivalent to the median (AUC = .72, p <.01) and another to the 75th percentile (AUC = .80, p <.01). The latter identified as a woman, between 18 and 25 years old with a low or slight level of self-esteem as predictors of a low level of psychological well-being. The BIEPS-A scale showed concurrent (r = .57) and predictive (β = .63) validity with the EAR. Discussion and conclusions: The BIEPS-A scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess psychological well-being in the Mexican population. However, the differences with respect to its original structure indicate the need for a psychological well-being scale designed specifically for the Mexican population.","PeriodicalId":42351,"journal":{"name":"Revista CES Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Psychological Well-Being Scale for Adults (BIEPS-A) in a Mexican Sample\",\"authors\":\"R. P. Figuerola-Escoto, David Luna, M. A. Lezana-Fernández, F. Meneses-González\",\"doi\":\"10.21615/cesp.5572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Psychological well-being favors the functioning of personal and social life. Valid and reliable instruments are necessary for its evaluation that allow deciding and assessing the actions necessary to promote it. Objective. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Scale of Psychological Well-being for Adults (BIEPS-A) in a Mexican sample. Methods: The BIEPS-A scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) were administered to 188 university students and 94 participants from the general population. Results: A parallel analysis detected a single factor in the BIEPS-A scale, structured by exploratory factor analysis (main components, oblique rotation) that retained 9 items and explained 54% of the variance. Internal consistency ranged from acceptable (Cronbach's α = .78) to high (ordinal alpha = .90). ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off point equivalent to the median (AUC = .72, p <.01) and another to the 75th percentile (AUC = .80, p <.01). The latter identified as a woman, between 18 and 25 years old with a low or slight level of self-esteem as predictors of a low level of psychological well-being. The BIEPS-A scale showed concurrent (r = .57) and predictive (β = .63) validity with the EAR. Discussion and conclusions: The BIEPS-A scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess psychological well-being in the Mexican population. However, the differences with respect to its original structure indicate the need for a psychological well-being scale designed specifically for the Mexican population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista CES Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista CES Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CES Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:心理健康有利于个人和社会生活的正常运转。有效和可靠的文书是对其进行评估所必需的,以便能够决定和评估促进它的必要行动。评估成人心理健康量表(BIEPS-A)在墨西哥样本中的心理测量特性。方法:采用BIEPS-A量表和Rosenberg自尊量表(RSES)对188名大学生和94名普通人群进行测量。结果:平行分析在BIEPS-A量表中检测到一个单一因素,该量表由探索性因素分析(主要成分,倾斜旋转)构建,保留了9个项目,解释了54%的方差。内部一致性从可接受(Cronbachα=.78)到高(有序α=.90)。ROC曲线分析确定了一个相当于中位数的临界点(AUC=.72,p<.01),另一个临界点相当于第75百分位(AUC=.80,p<0.01)。后者确定为女性,18至25岁之间,自尊水平低或轻微,是心理健康水平低的预测因素。BIEPS-A量表显示与EAR同时有效(r=.57)和预测有效(β=.63)。讨论和结论:BIEPS-A量表是评估墨西哥人口心理健康状况的有效和可靠的工具。然而,与原始结构的差异表明,需要专门为墨西哥人口设计的心理健康量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of the Psychological Well-Being Scale for Adults (BIEPS-A) in a Mexican Sample
Introduction: Psychological well-being favors the functioning of personal and social life. Valid and reliable instruments are necessary for its evaluation that allow deciding and assessing the actions necessary to promote it. Objective. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Scale of Psychological Well-being for Adults (BIEPS-A) in a Mexican sample. Methods: The BIEPS-A scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) were administered to 188 university students and 94 participants from the general population. Results: A parallel analysis detected a single factor in the BIEPS-A scale, structured by exploratory factor analysis (main components, oblique rotation) that retained 9 items and explained 54% of the variance. Internal consistency ranged from acceptable (Cronbach's α = .78) to high (ordinal alpha = .90). ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off point equivalent to the median (AUC = .72, p <.01) and another to the 75th percentile (AUC = .80, p <.01). The latter identified as a woman, between 18 and 25 years old with a low or slight level of self-esteem as predictors of a low level of psychological well-being. The BIEPS-A scale showed concurrent (r = .57) and predictive (β = .63) validity with the EAR. Discussion and conclusions: The BIEPS-A scale is a valid and reliable instrument to assess psychological well-being in the Mexican population. However, the differences with respect to its original structure indicate the need for a psychological well-being scale designed specifically for the Mexican population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista CES Psicologia
Revista CES Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Estudio psicométrico de la escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo para niños y adolescentes (PANAS-N) en población mexicana Satisfaction with life and related sociodemographic variables among bereaved adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Positive Youth Development in Colombia: Reflections on a Cross-cultural Collaboration Investigación en psicología positiva y su impacto en la comprensión de las capacidades humanas ¿Todos los grupos felices son productivos? Interacción entre el afecto positivo grupal y el desempeño laboral grupal: estudio exploratorio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1