COVID-19大流行期间公众宗教活动的参与。在各种限制之间及其比例

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Law Review Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.12775/clr.2022.008
Łukasz Skoczylas, Wojciech Piątek
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间公众宗教活动的参与。在各种限制之间及其比例","authors":"Łukasz Skoczylas, Wojciech Piątek","doi":"10.12775/clr.2022.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to manifest religion or belief in community with others is one of the essential components of religious freedom. However, it has been significantly curtailed in many countries owing to the Covid-19 pandemic. This article identifies the scope of the introduced restrictions, their proportionality, and their impact on the functioning of religious communities. Section 1 sets out three different approaches to participation in public religious practices in selected countries with severe (Germany), moderate (Poland), and liberal (Belarus) restrictions. In section 2, an international perspective on access to religious buildings in times of emergency is presented. The conclusions of this research are juxtaposed in section 3 with the jurisprudence of the highest national courts in Germany, the United States, and France, in order to highlight proportional legal solutions for the protection of religious freedom and public health. In the last section, the consequences of the introduced restrictions are analysed from the perspective of religious associations, using the example of Poland. Lastly, predictions concerning future participation in religious services are also made.","PeriodicalId":36604,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participation in Public Religious Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Between Various Limitations and Their Proportionality\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Skoczylas, Wojciech Piątek\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/clr.2022.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right to manifest religion or belief in community with others is one of the essential components of religious freedom. However, it has been significantly curtailed in many countries owing to the Covid-19 pandemic. This article identifies the scope of the introduced restrictions, their proportionality, and their impact on the functioning of religious communities. Section 1 sets out three different approaches to participation in public religious practices in selected countries with severe (Germany), moderate (Poland), and liberal (Belarus) restrictions. In section 2, an international perspective on access to religious buildings in times of emergency is presented. The conclusions of this research are juxtaposed in section 3 with the jurisprudence of the highest national courts in Germany, the United States, and France, in order to highlight proportional legal solutions for the protection of religious freedom and public health. In the last section, the consequences of the introduced restrictions are analysed from the perspective of religious associations, using the example of Poland. Lastly, predictions concerning future participation in religious services are also made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2022.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2022.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与他人共同表达宗教或信仰的权利是宗教自由的重要组成部分之一。然而,由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,许多国家大幅削减了这一数字。本文确定了引入的限制的范围,它们的相称性,以及它们对宗教社区运作的影响。第一节列出了在一些国家参与公共宗教活动的三种不同方式,这些国家有严格的(德国)、适度的(波兰)和自由的(白俄罗斯)限制。在第2节中,介绍了在紧急情况下进入宗教建筑的国际视角。第3节将这项研究的结论与德国、美国和法国最高国家法院的判例并列,以强调保护宗教自由和公众健康的比例法律解决办法。在最后一节中,以波兰为例,从宗教协会的角度分析了引入限制的后果。最后,对未来参与宗教服务的情况也作了预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participation in Public Religious Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Between Various Limitations and Their Proportionality
The right to manifest religion or belief in community with others is one of the essential components of religious freedom. However, it has been significantly curtailed in many countries owing to the Covid-19 pandemic. This article identifies the scope of the introduced restrictions, their proportionality, and their impact on the functioning of religious communities. Section 1 sets out three different approaches to participation in public religious practices in selected countries with severe (Germany), moderate (Poland), and liberal (Belarus) restrictions. In section 2, an international perspective on access to religious buildings in times of emergency is presented. The conclusions of this research are juxtaposed in section 3 with the jurisprudence of the highest national courts in Germany, the United States, and France, in order to highlight proportional legal solutions for the protection of religious freedom and public health. In the last section, the consequences of the introduced restrictions are analysed from the perspective of religious associations, using the example of Poland. Lastly, predictions concerning future participation in religious services are also made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Law Review
Comparative Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Balancing Business Objectives and Shareholders’ Rights in Voluntary Delisting: a Comparative Analysis of Selected Legal Jurisdictions A Comparative Study of Child Pornography Laws in the Republic of Korea and in Thailand against the Background of International Legal Frameworks International Arbitration as an Alternative Method for Settling Administrative Disputes in the Kuwaiti Law Validity of the Arbitration Clause in the International Employment Contract: the Viewpoint of the GCC Countries Protection of the Rights of Workers of Industrial Enterprises by International Humanitarian Law (on the Example of the War in Ukraine)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1