STAD学习模式与直接指导学习模式对中学生书面学习效果的影响

Agie Ginanjar, Riki Ramadhan, Widan Adib, Fauzan Effendy
{"title":"STAD学习模式与直接指导学习模式对中学生书面学习效果的影响","authors":"Agie Ginanjar, Riki Ramadhan, Widan Adib, Fauzan Effendy","doi":"10.17509/jpjo.v6i2.35500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the effect differences of the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model and the Direct Instruction (DI) learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. The research method used was an experimental quantitative approach with an intact-group comparison design. Participants from the population included 44 students (23 boys and 21 girls) aged 14-15 years selected using systematic sampling. Data collection techniques used observation and document analysis. The data analysis technique employed the independent samples t-test. The study results concluded that there were differences in the effects of the DI learning model and the STAD learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. Furthermore, the result showed that the STAD learning model was better than the DI learning model. Thus, the STAD learning model can be used to improve Pencak Silat's learning outcomes for Secondary School Students students.","PeriodicalId":34176,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between STAD Learning Model and Direct Instruction Learning Model on Pencak Silat Learning Outcomes of Secondary School Students\",\"authors\":\"Agie Ginanjar, Riki Ramadhan, Widan Adib, Fauzan Effendy\",\"doi\":\"10.17509/jpjo.v6i2.35500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine the effect differences of the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model and the Direct Instruction (DI) learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. The research method used was an experimental quantitative approach with an intact-group comparison design. Participants from the population included 44 students (23 boys and 21 girls) aged 14-15 years selected using systematic sampling. Data collection techniques used observation and document analysis. The data analysis technique employed the independent samples t-test. The study results concluded that there were differences in the effects of the DI learning model and the STAD learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. Furthermore, the result showed that the STAD learning model was better than the DI learning model. Thus, the STAD learning model can be used to improve Pencak Silat's learning outcomes for Secondary School Students students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v6i2.35500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v6i2.35500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定学生团队成就分部(STAD)学习模式和直接教学(DI)学习模式对Pencak-Silat学习结果的影响差异。所使用的研究方法是一种实验性的定量方法,采用完整的组比较设计。参与者包括44名14-15岁的学生(23名男孩和21名女孩),他们是通过系统抽样选出的。数据收集技术采用了观察和文件分析。数据分析技术采用独立样本t检验。研究结果表明,DI学习模式和STAD学习模式对Pencak-Silat学习结果的影响存在差异。结果表明,STAD学习模型优于DI学习模型。因此,STAD学习模型可用于改善Pencak-Silat中学生的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences between STAD Learning Model and Direct Instruction Learning Model on Pencak Silat Learning Outcomes of Secondary School Students
This study aimed to determine the effect differences of the Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) learning model and the Direct Instruction (DI) learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. The research method used was an experimental quantitative approach with an intact-group comparison design. Participants from the population included 44 students (23 boys and 21 girls) aged 14-15 years selected using systematic sampling. Data collection techniques used observation and document analysis. The data analysis technique employed the independent samples t-test. The study results concluded that there were differences in the effects of the DI learning model and the STAD learning model on Pencak Silat learning outcomes. Furthermore, the result showed that the STAD learning model was better than the DI learning model. Thus, the STAD learning model can be used to improve Pencak Silat's learning outcomes for Secondary School Students students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Peningkatan Hasil Latihan Passing dalam Permainan Sepak Bola Menggunakan Metode Drill pada Atlet SSB Perseta Peningkatan Passing Sepakbola Menggunakan Media Dinding pada Siswa Kelas V di MI Darul Ulum Sumberagung The Effect of Weight Training on the Kicking Ability of Female Soccer Players in Jember Survey Kondisi Fisik di SSB (Sekolah Sepak Bola) Cendana Analisis Kondisi Fisik Siswa Ekstrakurikuler Futsal di SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Jember
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1