在线社交网络中的谎言:一个缺陷还是一个特点

Mahed Maddah, Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
{"title":"在线社交网络中的谎言:一个缺陷还是一个特点","authors":"Mahed Maddah, Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh","doi":"10.1108/jices-04-2023-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOnline social networks can bridge the gap between distant individuals by simulating online experiences that closely resemble physical interactions. While people have positive experiences, such as joy, in a physical relationship and would like to enjoy those experiences online, they also have negative experiences, such as being subject to a lie. An online social network may allow users to lie to simulate a real-world social group better. However, lying must be prevented on social networks as unethical behavior. Thus, this study aims to investigate an ethical dilemma raised due to the two abovementioned perspectives.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper examines different aspects of lying in social networks, using a comprehensive descriptive literature review approach and a classification scheme.\n\n\nFindings\nContrary to their initial intent, social networks are disrupting the traditional notion of human interaction, either by disregarding the presence of dishonesty or by attempting to regulate relationships. In this research, the authors examine the challenges of these two perspectives by identifying enablers, consequences and control measures of lying on social networks at the individual, social and technological levels. The authors also develop a framework to facilitate investigating this dilemma.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper examines a controversial topic. Although lying is unethical, allowing users to lie may be considered an appealing feature of social network platforms. This paper offers a framework to propose several research directions for future studies. This study’s examination focuses on the challenges associated with deception on social networks, prompting the formulation of three crucial questions regarding the potential impact of technology on such behavior.\n","PeriodicalId":43830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Communication & Ethics in Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lying in online social networks: a bug or a feature\",\"authors\":\"Mahed Maddah, Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jices-04-2023-0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nOnline social networks can bridge the gap between distant individuals by simulating online experiences that closely resemble physical interactions. While people have positive experiences, such as joy, in a physical relationship and would like to enjoy those experiences online, they also have negative experiences, such as being subject to a lie. An online social network may allow users to lie to simulate a real-world social group better. However, lying must be prevented on social networks as unethical behavior. Thus, this study aims to investigate an ethical dilemma raised due to the two abovementioned perspectives.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper examines different aspects of lying in social networks, using a comprehensive descriptive literature review approach and a classification scheme.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nContrary to their initial intent, social networks are disrupting the traditional notion of human interaction, either by disregarding the presence of dishonesty or by attempting to regulate relationships. In this research, the authors examine the challenges of these two perspectives by identifying enablers, consequences and control measures of lying on social networks at the individual, social and technological levels. The authors also develop a framework to facilitate investigating this dilemma.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper examines a controversial topic. Although lying is unethical, allowing users to lie may be considered an appealing feature of social network platforms. This paper offers a framework to propose several research directions for future studies. This study’s examination focuses on the challenges associated with deception on social networks, prompting the formulation of three crucial questions regarding the potential impact of technology on such behavior.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Communication & Ethics in Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Communication & Ethics in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-04-2023-0050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Communication & Ethics in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-04-2023-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在线社交网络可以通过模拟与身体互动非常相似的在线体验来弥合遥远个体之间的差距。虽然人们在身体关系中有积极的体验,比如快乐,并希望在网上享受这些体验,但他们也有消极的体验,例如撒谎。在线社交网络可以允许用户撒谎,以更好地模拟现实世界中的社交群体。然而,必须防止在社交网络上撒谎是不道德的行为。因此,本研究旨在调查由于上述两个视角而引发的伦理困境。设计/方法论/方法本文采用全面的描述性文献综述方法和分类方案,研究了社交网络中撒谎的不同方面。发现与最初的意图相反,社交网络正在颠覆传统的人际互动观念,要么无视不诚实的存在,要么试图调节关系。在这项研究中,作者通过在个人、社会和技术层面上识别在社交网络上撒谎的促成因素、后果和控制措施,来检验这两种观点的挑战。作者还开发了一个框架来促进对这一困境的调查。原创性/价值这篇论文探讨了一个有争议的话题。尽管撒谎是不道德的,但允许用户撒谎可能被认为是社交网络平台的一个吸引人的功能。本文提供了一个框架,为未来的研究提出了几个研究方向。这项研究的重点是社交网络上与欺骗相关的挑战,促使人们提出了关于技术对这种行为的潜在影响的三个关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lying in online social networks: a bug or a feature
Purpose Online social networks can bridge the gap between distant individuals by simulating online experiences that closely resemble physical interactions. While people have positive experiences, such as joy, in a physical relationship and would like to enjoy those experiences online, they also have negative experiences, such as being subject to a lie. An online social network may allow users to lie to simulate a real-world social group better. However, lying must be prevented on social networks as unethical behavior. Thus, this study aims to investigate an ethical dilemma raised due to the two abovementioned perspectives. Design/methodology/approach This paper examines different aspects of lying in social networks, using a comprehensive descriptive literature review approach and a classification scheme. Findings Contrary to their initial intent, social networks are disrupting the traditional notion of human interaction, either by disregarding the presence of dishonesty or by attempting to regulate relationships. In this research, the authors examine the challenges of these two perspectives by identifying enablers, consequences and control measures of lying on social networks at the individual, social and technological levels. The authors also develop a framework to facilitate investigating this dilemma. Originality/value This paper examines a controversial topic. Although lying is unethical, allowing users to lie may be considered an appealing feature of social network platforms. This paper offers a framework to propose several research directions for future studies. This study’s examination focuses on the challenges associated with deception on social networks, prompting the formulation of three crucial questions regarding the potential impact of technology on such behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Unveiling virtual chat group inclusiveness code of conduct by Nigerians New social media nones: how and why Americans have changed their use of social media to consume political news Adoption of blockchain technology in organizations: from morality, ethics and sustainability perspectives How to program autonomous vehicle (AV) crash algorithms: an Islamic ethical perspective Dark side of blockchain technology adoption in SMEs: an Indian perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1