衔接与弱/强量词的区分

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Croatian Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020323

J. Collins

{"title":"衔接与弱/强量词的区分","authors":"J. Collins","doi":"10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pietroski’s model of semantic composition is introduced and compared to the standard type hierarchy. Particular focus is then given to Pietroski’s account of quanti ﬁ cation. The question is raised of how the model might account for the weak/strong distinction in natural language quanti ﬁ cation. A number of options are addressed and one proposal is tentatively recommended.","PeriodicalId":43218,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","volume":"20 1","pages":"283-294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conjoining and the Weak/Strong Quantifier Distinction\",\"authors\":\"J. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pietroski’s model of semantic composition is introduced and compared to the standard type hierarchy. Particular focus is then given to Pietroski’s account of quanti ﬁ cation. The question is raised of how the model might account for the weak/strong distinction in natural language quanti ﬁ cation. A number of options are addressed and one proposal is tentatively recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"283-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020323\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/CROATJPHIL202020323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍了彼得罗斯基的语义组合模型，并与标准类型层次结构进行了比较。然后特别关注Pietroski对量化的描述。提出了一个问题，即该模型如何解释自然语言量化中的弱/强区别。讨论了若干备选方案，并初步建议了一项提案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Conjoining and the Weak/Strong Quantifier Distinction

Pietroski’s model of semantic composition is introduced and compared to the standard type hierarchy. Particular focus is then given to Pietroski’s account of quanti ﬁ cation. The question is raised of how the model might account for the weak/strong distinction in natural language quanti ﬁ cation. A number of options are addressed and one proposal is tentatively recommended.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊