将贸易和环境规范结合在一起:WTO渔业补贴谈判的案例

Q2 Arts and Humanities Asian International Studies Review Pub Date : 2022-10-26 DOI:10.1163/2667078x-bja10017
Youngjeen Cho
{"title":"将贸易和环境规范结合在一起:WTO渔业补贴谈判的案例","authors":"Youngjeen Cho","doi":"10.1163/2667078x-bja10017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Protecting the environment is not a new topic in international trade law. The growing environmental impacts of globalization have made protecting the environment an increasingly pressing issue. In fisheries subsidies negotiations since 2001, WTO members have attempted to introduce environmental norms into the existing trade law framework. After examining the draft text and the Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, this article finds it difficult and inappropriate to assess and regulate purely environmental issues through the lens of trade agreements, particularly the SCM Agreement. The draft text and the Agreement reveal conflicts with the basic concepts, principles, and framework of WTO law and do not ensure effective conservation of fisheries stocks. Based on these findings, this article argues that, as much as the conservation of fish stocks is imperative, it should be done in a manner consistent with the basic framework of international law and international trade law.","PeriodicalId":37023,"journal":{"name":"Asian International Studies Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing Trade and Environmental Norms Together: The Case of the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations\",\"authors\":\"Youngjeen Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2667078x-bja10017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Protecting the environment is not a new topic in international trade law. The growing environmental impacts of globalization have made protecting the environment an increasingly pressing issue. In fisheries subsidies negotiations since 2001, WTO members have attempted to introduce environmental norms into the existing trade law framework. After examining the draft text and the Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, this article finds it difficult and inappropriate to assess and regulate purely environmental issues through the lens of trade agreements, particularly the SCM Agreement. The draft text and the Agreement reveal conflicts with the basic concepts, principles, and framework of WTO law and do not ensure effective conservation of fisheries stocks. Based on these findings, this article argues that, as much as the conservation of fish stocks is imperative, it should be done in a manner consistent with the basic framework of international law and international trade law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian International Studies Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian International Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078x-bja10017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian International Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2667078x-bja10017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护环境在国际贸易法中并不是一个新话题。全球化对环境的影响日益严重,使保护环境成为一个日益紧迫的问题。自2001年以来,在渔业补贴谈判中,世贸组织成员试图将环境规范纳入现有的贸易法框架。在审查了案文草案和《渔业补贴协定》之后,本条认为,从贸易协定,特别是《供应链管理协定》的角度来评估和规范纯粹的环境问题是困难和不适当的。草案案文和《协定》揭示了与世贸组织法律的基本概念、原则和框架的冲突,并不能确保有效养护渔业种群。基于这些发现,本文认为,尽管保护鱼类种群是当务之急,但应以符合国际法和国际贸易法基本框架的方式进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bringing Trade and Environmental Norms Together: The Case of the WTO Fisheries Subsidies Negotiations
Protecting the environment is not a new topic in international trade law. The growing environmental impacts of globalization have made protecting the environment an increasingly pressing issue. In fisheries subsidies negotiations since 2001, WTO members have attempted to introduce environmental norms into the existing trade law framework. After examining the draft text and the Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, this article finds it difficult and inappropriate to assess and regulate purely environmental issues through the lens of trade agreements, particularly the SCM Agreement. The draft text and the Agreement reveal conflicts with the basic concepts, principles, and framework of WTO law and do not ensure effective conservation of fisheries stocks. Based on these findings, this article argues that, as much as the conservation of fish stocks is imperative, it should be done in a manner consistent with the basic framework of international law and international trade law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian International Studies Review
Asian International Studies Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liberal Convergence or Differential Exclusion? Temporary Labor Migration Policy in Japan and Korea The Impacts of Community-Driven Development Program in Conflict-Affected Regions: Evidence from Cambodia Assessing the Political Clout of Thailand’s “Monarchized” Military in 2023 Whose Ideas Matter? The Changing Meaning of Health Protocols in Indonesia’s Border Management Policies in the Pandemic Era Securitizing Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Threats: China’s Track 2 Diplomacy in Southeast Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1