数据作为欧洲法律的基本设施:如何定义“目标”市场并转移数据管道?*

Q2 Social Sciences European Competition Journal Pub Date : 2019-07-22 DOI:10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576
Édouard Bruc
{"title":"数据作为欧洲法律的基本设施:如何定义“目标”市场并转移数据管道?*","authors":"Édouard Bruc","doi":"10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A new economic test called the holistic inter-dynamic analysis is proposed to tackle both sides of the multisided market simultaneously. The dominance issue solved, the risk of 102 TFEU abuse regarding data was already highlighted in the 1996 Database Directive. On that matter, this article assesses each legal condition of a “refusal to supply” access. Apropos the indispensability condition, data’s ubiquitous nature may be dispelled by an analysis of the context in which it evolves or its link with AI or the IoT. Concerning its replicability prong, data’s feature, feedback loops, network effects, switching costs or economies of scale/scope are conducive to super-dominance. They altogether can create an insurmountable bottleneck. Regarding innovation, the author carefully analyses the “limitation of technical development” condition either on an economic or a legal standpoint. Finally, regarding privacy law, when granting access, a coherent approach appears feasible through a proportionality test.","PeriodicalId":52118,"journal":{"name":"European Competition Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data as an essential facility in European law: how to define the “target” market and divert the data pipeline?*\",\"authors\":\"Édouard Bruc\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A new economic test called the holistic inter-dynamic analysis is proposed to tackle both sides of the multisided market simultaneously. The dominance issue solved, the risk of 102 TFEU abuse regarding data was already highlighted in the 1996 Database Directive. On that matter, this article assesses each legal condition of a “refusal to supply” access. Apropos the indispensability condition, data’s ubiquitous nature may be dispelled by an analysis of the context in which it evolves or its link with AI or the IoT. Concerning its replicability prong, data’s feature, feedback loops, network effects, switching costs or economies of scale/scope are conducive to super-dominance. They altogether can create an insurmountable bottleneck. Regarding innovation, the author carefully analyses the “limitation of technical development” condition either on an economic or a legal standpoint. Finally, regarding privacy law, when granting access, a coherent approach appears feasible through a proportionality test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Competition Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Competition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Competition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2019.1644576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要提出了一种新的经济测试方法,称为整体交互动态分析,以同时处理多边市场的两面性。支配地位问题得到解决,1996年《数据库指令》已经强调了102个TFEU滥用数据的风险。关于这一问题,本文评估了“拒绝提供”准入的每一个法律条件。在不可或缺的条件下,数据的普遍性可以通过分析其发展的背景或与人工智能或物联网的联系来消除。就其可复制性而言,数据的特征、反馈回路、网络效应、转换成本或规模/范围经济都有利于超级优势。它们加在一起会造成一个不可逾越的瓶颈。关于创新,笔者从经济学或法学的角度对“技术发展的局限性”进行了细致的分析。最后,关于隐私法,在允许访问时,通过比例测试,一种连贯的方法似乎是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data as an essential facility in European law: how to define the “target” market and divert the data pipeline?*
ABSTRACT A new economic test called the holistic inter-dynamic analysis is proposed to tackle both sides of the multisided market simultaneously. The dominance issue solved, the risk of 102 TFEU abuse regarding data was already highlighted in the 1996 Database Directive. On that matter, this article assesses each legal condition of a “refusal to supply” access. Apropos the indispensability condition, data’s ubiquitous nature may be dispelled by an analysis of the context in which it evolves or its link with AI or the IoT. Concerning its replicability prong, data’s feature, feedback loops, network effects, switching costs or economies of scale/scope are conducive to super-dominance. They altogether can create an insurmountable bottleneck. Regarding innovation, the author carefully analyses the “limitation of technical development” condition either on an economic or a legal standpoint. Finally, regarding privacy law, when granting access, a coherent approach appears feasible through a proportionality test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Competition Journal
European Competition Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The European Competition Journal publishes outstanding scholarly articles relating to European competition law and economics. Its mission is to help foster learning and debate about how European competition law and policy can continue to develop in an economically rational way. Articles published in the Journal are subject to rigorous peer review by leading experts from around Europe. Topics include: -Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers -Enlargement of the Union - the ramifications for Competition Policy -Unilateral and Coordinated Effects in Merger Control -Modernisation of European Competition law -Cartels and Leniency.
期刊最新文献
Quality control in the DMA procedure: the exclusion of the Hearing Officer Overlooking digital collusion risks in the EU's agenda for a single European data space(s) A fair share of sustainability benefits for consumers: the Horizontal Guidelines in the silent spring Competition concerns with foundation models: a new feast for big tech? Antitrust restriction on football governance: the case of European Super League
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1