媒体使用与情感政治两极分化:是什么塑造了公众对移民应得的看法?

IF 2 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1080/08838151.2023.2173196
Lars Willnat, C. Ogan, Jian Shi
{"title":"媒体使用与情感政治两极分化:是什么塑造了公众对移民应得的看法?","authors":"Lars Willnat, C. Ogan, Jian Shi","doi":"10.1080/08838151.2023.2173196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores the connections between partisan news exposure, affective political polarization, perceived threats from migrants, and immigrant deservingness. Data from a 2018 U.S. national survey indicate that exposure to immigration news on Fox News is associated with higher levels of polarization among Republicans and Democrats, while exposure to such content on CNN is not. Additionally, greater polarization correlates with Republicans perceiving more threats from migrants, while Democrats perceive fewer. Finally, Republicans with higher levels of polarization are more likely than polarized Democrats to believe that migrants should have specific qualifications to be considered deserving.","PeriodicalId":48051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media","volume":"67 1","pages":"183 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media Use and Affective Political Polarization: What Shapes Public Perceptions of Immigrants’ Deservingness?\",\"authors\":\"Lars Willnat, C. Ogan, Jian Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08838151.2023.2173196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores the connections between partisan news exposure, affective political polarization, perceived threats from migrants, and immigrant deservingness. Data from a 2018 U.S. national survey indicate that exposure to immigration news on Fox News is associated with higher levels of polarization among Republicans and Democrats, while exposure to such content on CNN is not. Additionally, greater polarization correlates with Republicans perceiving more threats from migrants, while Democrats perceive fewer. Finally, Republicans with higher levels of polarization are more likely than polarized Democrats to believe that migrants should have specific qualifications to be considered deserving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2023.2173196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2023.2173196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了党派新闻曝光、情感政治两极分化、移民威胁感知和移民应得之间的联系。2018年数据 美国全国调查显示,在福克斯新闻上接触移民新闻与共和党和民主党之间的两极分化程度较高有关,而在美国有线电视新闻网上接触此类内容则不然。此外,更大的两极分化与共和党人感知到更多来自移民的威胁有关,而民主党人感知到的威胁更少。最后,两极分化程度较高的共和党人比两极分化的民主党人更有可能认为移民应该具有特定的资格,才是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Media Use and Affective Political Polarization: What Shapes Public Perceptions of Immigrants’ Deservingness?
ABSTRACT This study explores the connections between partisan news exposure, affective political polarization, perceived threats from migrants, and immigrant deservingness. Data from a 2018 U.S. national survey indicate that exposure to immigration news on Fox News is associated with higher levels of polarization among Republicans and Democrats, while exposure to such content on CNN is not. Additionally, greater polarization correlates with Republicans perceiving more threats from migrants, while Democrats perceive fewer. Finally, Republicans with higher levels of polarization are more likely than polarized Democrats to believe that migrants should have specific qualifications to be considered deserving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Published quarterly for the Broadcast Education Association, the Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media contains timely articles about new developments, trends, and research in electronic media written by academicians, researchers, and other electronic media professionals. The Journal invites submissions of original research that examine a broad range of issues concerning the electronic media, including the historical, technological, economic, legal, policy, cultural, social, and psychological dimensions. Scholarship that extends a historiography, tests theory, or that fosters innovative perspectives on topics of importance to the field, is particularly encouraged. The Journal is open to a diversity of theoretic paradigms and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
The Disparate Prosocial Implications of Ongoing Entertainment Health Media Exposure: A Multi-Malady Stigma Communication Comparison Crime in TV, the News, and Film: Misconceptions, Mischaracterizations, and Misinformation Silencing Online Incivility: Examining the Effects of Impoliteness and Intolerance in Online Political Discussions Which Perceived Opinion Climates Influence the Participation in Online Political Discussions? Digital Journalism and the Facilitation of Hate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1