实用程序体重估计和修正系数适用于坎波利纳马

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science Pub Date : 2021-09-23 DOI:10.37496/rbz5020200047
F. A. C. D. Souza, Glaciane Lopes Teixeira, T. J. Fernandes, F. R. Muniz, Fabiana Oliveira Cunha, S. L. Meirelles, J. A. Muniz, R. S. Moura
{"title":"实用程序体重估计和修正系数适用于坎波利纳马","authors":"F. A. C. D. Souza, Glaciane Lopes Teixeira, T. J. Fernandes, F. R. Muniz, Fabiana Oliveira Cunha, S. L. Meirelles, J. A. Muniz, R. S. Moura","doi":"10.37496/rbz5020200047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the following six body weight (BW) estimation methods in Campolina (CAM) horses: A - weight tape placed at three different positions on the animal’s thorax; B - Crevat and Quetelet’s formula; C - Hall’s formula; D - Hintz and Griffiths’s table; E - Santos’s table; and F - Cintra’s formula. A total of 380 CAM horses were separated according to sex, age class, and gestational stage and evaluated. To determine their accuracy, weights measured on a scale and weight estimates of the six methods were compared by paired t-test, mean prediction error (MPE), and coefficient of determination (R2), using R software. The predictive capacity of method F was lower in the 6-12 months age class, so this formula is not indicated. The BW was overestimated compared with the actual weight by methods A (with weight tape placed in position 3) and B and underestimated by method C. Methods D and E accurately estimated BW of CAM horses. Correction factors are required to accurately estimate BW in this breed using methods B and C. Method A with the weight tape placed in position 2 is the most accurate for predicting BW, including pregnant female horses, and can, therefore, be considered the most suitable method for estimating BW of CAM horses.","PeriodicalId":49614,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical procedures to body weight estimation and correction factors applied to Campolina horses\",\"authors\":\"F. A. C. D. Souza, Glaciane Lopes Teixeira, T. J. Fernandes, F. R. Muniz, Fabiana Oliveira Cunha, S. L. Meirelles, J. A. Muniz, R. S. Moura\",\"doi\":\"10.37496/rbz5020200047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the following six body weight (BW) estimation methods in Campolina (CAM) horses: A - weight tape placed at three different positions on the animal’s thorax; B - Crevat and Quetelet’s formula; C - Hall’s formula; D - Hintz and Griffiths’s table; E - Santos’s table; and F - Cintra’s formula. A total of 380 CAM horses were separated according to sex, age class, and gestational stage and evaluated. To determine their accuracy, weights measured on a scale and weight estimates of the six methods were compared by paired t-test, mean prediction error (MPE), and coefficient of determination (R2), using R software. The predictive capacity of method F was lower in the 6-12 months age class, so this formula is not indicated. The BW was overestimated compared with the actual weight by methods A (with weight tape placed in position 3) and B and underestimated by method C. Methods D and E accurately estimated BW of CAM horses. Correction factors are required to accurately estimate BW in this breed using methods B and C. Method A with the weight tape placed in position 2 is the most accurate for predicting BW, including pregnant female horses, and can, therefore, be considered the most suitable method for estimating BW of CAM horses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是评估以下六种体重估计方法在Campolina(CAM)马中的准确性:A-放置在动物胸部三个不同位置的重量带;B-Crevat和Quetelet公式;C——霍尔公式;D-Hintz和Griffiths的表;E-桑托斯表;以及F-Cintra公式。共有380匹CAM马根据性别、年龄等级和妊娠期进行了分离和评估。为了确定其准确性,使用R软件,通过配对t检验、平均预测误差(MPE)和决定系数(R2)比较在量表上测量的权重和六种方法的权重估计。方法F的预测能力在6-12个月年龄组中较低,因此该公式不适用。方法A(重量带放置在位置3)和方法B高估了BW与实际重量的比较,方法C低估了BW。方法D和E准确估计了CAM马的BW。使用方法B和C准确估计该品种的BW需要校正系数。将重量带放置在位置2的方法A是预测BW(包括怀孕母马)最准确的方法,因此可以被认为是估计CAM马BW的最合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practical procedures to body weight estimation and correction factors applied to Campolina horses
ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the following six body weight (BW) estimation methods in Campolina (CAM) horses: A - weight tape placed at three different positions on the animal’s thorax; B - Crevat and Quetelet’s formula; C - Hall’s formula; D - Hintz and Griffiths’s table; E - Santos’s table; and F - Cintra’s formula. A total of 380 CAM horses were separated according to sex, age class, and gestational stage and evaluated. To determine their accuracy, weights measured on a scale and weight estimates of the six methods were compared by paired t-test, mean prediction error (MPE), and coefficient of determination (R2), using R software. The predictive capacity of method F was lower in the 6-12 months age class, so this formula is not indicated. The BW was overestimated compared with the actual weight by methods A (with weight tape placed in position 3) and B and underestimated by method C. Methods D and E accurately estimated BW of CAM horses. Correction factors are required to accurately estimate BW in this breed using methods B and C. Method A with the weight tape placed in position 2 is the most accurate for predicting BW, including pregnant female horses, and can, therefore, be considered the most suitable method for estimating BW of CAM horses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ; Brazilian Journal of Animal Science) encompasses all fields of Animal Science Research. The RBZ publishes original scientific articles in the areas of Aquaculture, Biometeorology and Animal Welfare, Forage Crops and Grasslands, Animal and Forage Plants Breeding and Genetics, Animal Reproduction, Ruminant and Non-Ruminant Nutrition, and Animal Production Systems and Agribusiness.
期刊最新文献
Productive and economic performance of feedlot young Nellore bulls fed whole oilseeds Influence of nutritional management prior to adaptation to a feedlot diet on ruminal microbiota of Nellore cattle Relationships between follicle and corpus luteum size and vascularization with ovulation, progesterone production, and pregnancy in Nellore beef cattle Influence of irrigation and supplementation on performance and ingestive behavior of beef cattle on mixed grass pastures The economic value of sustainability of the integrated crop-livestock system in relation to conventional systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1