鉴定“患者对专业医师遵守专业行为的看法”工具的心理测量特性评估

F. Hajibabaee, Seyedeh Khadijeh Moghimi Darzi, F. Khatami, Hadis Ashrafizadeh, Amirahmad Shojaei
{"title":"鉴定“患者对专业医师遵守专业行为的看法”工具的心理测量特性评估","authors":"F. Hajibabaee, Seyedeh Khadijeh Moghimi Darzi, F. Khatami, Hadis Ashrafizadeh, Amirahmad Shojaei","doi":"10.52547/jarums.21.3.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Considering the importance of professional commitment in medical services, it is necessary to provide an appropriate questionnaire to measure professional commitment and behavior. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the psychometric properties of the questionnaire \"Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by specialist doctors\". Methods: The present study is a psychometric research that was conducted in four phases. The first phase of this study was based on a professional behavior tool guide, review of texts and collection of experts' opinions. in the second phase , determining the validity of items in the form of the face and content validity, in the third phase , the pilot study, and in the fourth phase,instrument reliability was conducted in two ways: internal consistency and instrument stability. Results: A pool of 50 items was formed to design the questionnaire. After interviewing the study population and removing overlapping items, the number of items was reduced to 31 items. The results of CVR calculation showed that out of the total of 31 items, 13 items had a cutoff point less than 0.42, which were removed, and 18 items with a CVR score > 0.62 remained according to the opinion of the research team. In the face validity stage, the Impact factor < 1.5 was used as the basis for exclusion, and all the items had a high impact factor, and finally, the draft of the questionnairewas approved with the same 18 items. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.88 and the internal correlation coefficient of the questionnairewas 0.93, which indicated the appropriate reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the questionnaire on \"Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by a specialist physician\" in Iranian society has the necessary content and face validity and adequate reliability. By using this questionnaire, hospital officials can check the status of professional ethics of their specialist physician from the patients' point of view and take effective measures to eliminate the shortcomings.","PeriodicalId":30758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the tool for identifying \\\"Patients' Views on the Observance of Professional Behavior by Specialized Physicians\\\"\",\"authors\":\"F. Hajibabaee, Seyedeh Khadijeh Moghimi Darzi, F. Khatami, Hadis Ashrafizadeh, Amirahmad Shojaei\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/jarums.21.3.329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & objectives: Considering the importance of professional commitment in medical services, it is necessary to provide an appropriate questionnaire to measure professional commitment and behavior. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the psychometric properties of the questionnaire \\\"Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by specialist doctors\\\". Methods: The present study is a psychometric research that was conducted in four phases. The first phase of this study was based on a professional behavior tool guide, review of texts and collection of experts' opinions. in the second phase , determining the validity of items in the form of the face and content validity, in the third phase , the pilot study, and in the fourth phase,instrument reliability was conducted in two ways: internal consistency and instrument stability. Results: A pool of 50 items was formed to design the questionnaire. After interviewing the study population and removing overlapping items, the number of items was reduced to 31 items. The results of CVR calculation showed that out of the total of 31 items, 13 items had a cutoff point less than 0.42, which were removed, and 18 items with a CVR score > 0.62 remained according to the opinion of the research team. In the face validity stage, the Impact factor < 1.5 was used as the basis for exclusion, and all the items had a high impact factor, and finally, the draft of the questionnairewas approved with the same 18 items. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.88 and the internal correlation coefficient of the questionnairewas 0.93, which indicated the appropriate reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the questionnaire on \\\"Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by a specialist physician\\\" in Iranian society has the necessary content and face validity and adequate reliability. By using this questionnaire, hospital officials can check the status of professional ethics of their specialist physician from the patients' point of view and take effective measures to eliminate the shortcomings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/jarums.21.3.329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jarums.21.3.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:考虑到专业承诺在医疗服务中的重要性,有必要提供一份适当的问卷来衡量专业承诺和行为。因此,本研究旨在调查问卷“患者对专科医生遵守职业行为的看法”的心理测量特性。方法:本研究分四个阶段进行心理测量学研究。本研究的第一阶段基于专业行为工具指南、文本回顾和专家意见收集。在第二阶段,确定项目的有效性形式为面孔和内容的有效性,在第三阶段,进行试点研究,在第四阶段,通过两种方式进行仪器可靠性:内部一致性和仪器稳定性。结果:形成了一个由50个项目组成的调查问卷。在对研究人群进行访谈并删除重叠项目后,项目数量减少到31个。CVR计算结果显示,在总共31个项目中,有13个项目的截止点低于0.42,这些项目被删除,根据研究团队的意见,CVR得分>0.62的项目仍有18个。在面孔有效性阶段,影响因子<1.5被用作排除的基础,所有项目都有很高的影响因子,最终,问卷草案以相同的18个项目获得批准。Cronbachα系数为0.88,问卷的内相关系数为0.93,表明问卷具有适当的可靠性。结论:根据本研究的结果,伊朗社会中“患者对专科医生遵守职业行为的看法”问卷具有必要的内容、表面有效性和足够的可靠性。通过使用该问卷,医院官员可以从患者的角度检查其专科医生的职业道德状况,并采取有效措施消除不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the tool for identifying "Patients' Views on the Observance of Professional Behavior by Specialized Physicians"
Background & objectives: Considering the importance of professional commitment in medical services, it is necessary to provide an appropriate questionnaire to measure professional commitment and behavior. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the psychometric properties of the questionnaire "Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by specialist doctors". Methods: The present study is a psychometric research that was conducted in four phases. The first phase of this study was based on a professional behavior tool guide, review of texts and collection of experts' opinions. in the second phase , determining the validity of items in the form of the face and content validity, in the third phase , the pilot study, and in the fourth phase,instrument reliability was conducted in two ways: internal consistency and instrument stability. Results: A pool of 50 items was formed to design the questionnaire. After interviewing the study population and removing overlapping items, the number of items was reduced to 31 items. The results of CVR calculation showed that out of the total of 31 items, 13 items had a cutoff point less than 0.42, which were removed, and 18 items with a CVR score > 0.62 remained according to the opinion of the research team. In the face validity stage, the Impact factor < 1.5 was used as the basis for exclusion, and all the items had a high impact factor, and finally, the draft of the questionnairewas approved with the same 18 items. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.88 and the internal correlation coefficient of the questionnairewas 0.93, which indicated the appropriate reliability of the questionnaire. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, the questionnaire on "Patients' views regarding the observance of professional behavior by a specialist physician" in Iranian society has the necessary content and face validity and adequate reliability. By using this questionnaire, hospital officials can check the status of professional ethics of their specialist physician from the patients' point of view and take effective measures to eliminate the shortcomings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura following the AstraZeneca Vaccine Evaluation and Comparison of the Changes of Blood Biochemical and Hematological Factors in Adults with and Without History of COVID-19 Fabrication and Characterization of Betamethasone-loaded Oral Thin Films as a Novel Drug Delivery Platform for Oral Lichen Planus and Recurrent Mouth Ulcers Investigating Fenugreek Seed Aqueous Extract on Sperm Parameters in Selected Type II Rats Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Discriminant Analysis Algorithm in Active Elderly Men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1