推进中国区域创新的结构化分析。将新观点纳入综合方法。

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Erdkunde Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI:10.3112/erdkunde.2019.03.02
Ingo Liefner, H. Kroll
{"title":"推进中国区域创新的结构化分析。将新观点纳入综合方法。","authors":"Ingo Liefner, H. Kroll","doi":"10.3112/erdkunde.2019.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acknowledging the obvious diversity in development trajectories of Chinese regions, this paper seeks to address the prevalent lack of complexity in comparative studies on that country’s regional innovation systems and innovation outcomes. It argues that the prevalent dichotomy between rich yet idiosyncratic case studies and one-dimensional quantitative benchmarking of 'technological capacities' limits the explanatory and predictive power of existing research. Against this background, it suggests a structuring heuristic that compiles different perspectives of analysis which earlier studies have identified as important. It emphasizes, firstly, that opportunities for innovation in regional settings are not only shaped by the regional technology base, but also triggered by (latent) demand and access to users. Additionally, the actual manifestation of opportunities is contingent on local stakeholder agency and the shared perceptions and cognitive frames (mindsets) that shape it. This paper states, secondly, that these regional characteristics determine the types of innovation produced. To demonstrate this as well as how this approach can indeed provide additional insights, the authors perform structured literature reviews using the proposed multi-perspective framework.","PeriodicalId":11917,"journal":{"name":"Erdkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the structured analysis of regional innovation in China. Integrating new perspectives in a comprehensive approach.\",\"authors\":\"Ingo Liefner, H. Kroll\",\"doi\":\"10.3112/erdkunde.2019.03.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acknowledging the obvious diversity in development trajectories of Chinese regions, this paper seeks to address the prevalent lack of complexity in comparative studies on that country’s regional innovation systems and innovation outcomes. It argues that the prevalent dichotomy between rich yet idiosyncratic case studies and one-dimensional quantitative benchmarking of 'technological capacities' limits the explanatory and predictive power of existing research. Against this background, it suggests a structuring heuristic that compiles different perspectives of analysis which earlier studies have identified as important. It emphasizes, firstly, that opportunities for innovation in regional settings are not only shaped by the regional technology base, but also triggered by (latent) demand and access to users. Additionally, the actual manifestation of opportunities is contingent on local stakeholder agency and the shared perceptions and cognitive frames (mindsets) that shape it. This paper states, secondly, that these regional characteristics determine the types of innovation produced. To demonstrate this as well as how this approach can indeed provide additional insights, the authors perform structured literature reviews using the proposed multi-perspective framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erdkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erdkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2019.03.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erdkunde","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2019.03.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

鉴于中国区域发展轨迹的明显多样性,本文试图解决对该国区域创新体系和创新成果的比较研究普遍缺乏复杂性的问题。它认为,丰富但独特的案例研究和“技术能力”的一维定量基准之间普遍存在的二分法限制了现有研究的解释力和预测力。在这种背景下,它提出了一种结构化启发式方法,该方法汇集了早期研究认为重要的不同分析视角。它强调,首先,区域环境中的创新机会不仅由区域技术基础决定,还由(潜在的)需求和对用户的访问引发。此外,机会的实际表现取决于当地利益相关者的机构以及形成机会的共同认知和认知框架。其次,本文指出,这些区域特征决定了创新的类型。为了证明这一点以及这种方法如何真正提供额外的见解,作者使用所提出的多视角框架进行了结构化的文献综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing the structured analysis of regional innovation in China. Integrating new perspectives in a comprehensive approach.
Acknowledging the obvious diversity in development trajectories of Chinese regions, this paper seeks to address the prevalent lack of complexity in comparative studies on that country’s regional innovation systems and innovation outcomes. It argues that the prevalent dichotomy between rich yet idiosyncratic case studies and one-dimensional quantitative benchmarking of 'technological capacities' limits the explanatory and predictive power of existing research. Against this background, it suggests a structuring heuristic that compiles different perspectives of analysis which earlier studies have identified as important. It emphasizes, firstly, that opportunities for innovation in regional settings are not only shaped by the regional technology base, but also triggered by (latent) demand and access to users. Additionally, the actual manifestation of opportunities is contingent on local stakeholder agency and the shared perceptions and cognitive frames (mindsets) that shape it. This paper states, secondly, that these regional characteristics determine the types of innovation produced. To demonstrate this as well as how this approach can indeed provide additional insights, the authors perform structured literature reviews using the proposed multi-perspective framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Erdkunde
Erdkunde 地学-自然地理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since foundation by Carl Troll in 1947, ''ERDKUNDE – Archive for Scientific Geography'' has established as a successful international journal of geography. ERDKUNDE publishes scientific articles covering the whole range of physical and human geography. The journal offers state of the art reports on recent trends and developments in specific fields of geography and comprehensive and critical reviews of new geographical publications. All manuscripts are subject to a peer-review procedure prior to publication. High quality cartography and regular large sized supplements are prominent features of ERDKUNDE, as well as standard coloured figures.
期刊最新文献
Disaster risk perception and preparedness of households in Yangon, Myanmar: Disaster experiences, socio-demographic factors and spatial variation Book review: Mathieu, Jon: Mount Sacred. A short global history of holy mountains since 1500 Introducing a multi-level governance phase framework for event-led urban development formats Pluriverse in science: Discourses of Amazonian land-use change and socio-environmental (in)justice How geoecological components of a terroir can be altered by spatial changes of vineyards – A case study from Eger Wine District (Hungary)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1