气管造口术患者吸入诱导:地氟醚与七氟醚的比较

E. Kerem, Erkalp Nuran Kalekoglu, E. Veysel, Korkut Arzu Yasemin, Abut Yesim Cokay
{"title":"气管造口术患者吸入诱导:地氟醚与七氟醚的比较","authors":"E. Kerem, Erkalp Nuran Kalekoglu, E. Veysel, Korkut Arzu Yasemin, Abut Yesim Cokay","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inhalation induction (II) of anesthesia is a commonly used method in difficult airway management, pediatric anesthesia and also tracheostomized patients’ surgical practices. Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most common inhalation agents for II in these procedures of patients. We demonstrated that II with sevoflurane or desflurane in tracheostomized patients who are not studied up until now and their outcomes. Cardiorespiratory changes in II should be the same in tracheostomized patients with desflurane compared to sevoflurane. Methods: We studied 60 adult tracheostomized patients (ASA physical status 2 or 3), scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for II. Following 1 mg midazolam and 1 μg/kg fentanyl, all patients were intubated via tracheostomy with a montandon tracheostomy tube. In the Group D, patients were firstly instructed to breath and then they immediately started using desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Desflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 3% and increased by 1% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 12%. In the Group S, patients were also instructed to breathe firstly and then they immediately started using sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Sevoflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 1% and increased by 0.3% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 6%. Hemodynamic values [(SpO2, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (MAP)], respiratory complications (coughing, bronchospasm, desaturation, breath-holding), purposeful movement of limbs, secretions requiring removal by suction, time to loss of response to command and concentration of expired inhalation agent (desflurane or sevoflurane) were recorded for 10 minutes of II. Mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage were used for descriptive statistics with SSPS 20.0. Results: Couching, bronchospasm, desaturation, breathholding and purposeful movements distributions did not show any differences in Group D and Group S. Requirement of secretion removal was higher in Group D. Hemodynamic values were more stable in Group S. Conclusion: In tracheostomized patients’ II; desflurane has similar airway irritation with sevoflurane but II is more stable with sevoflurane than desflurane.","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhalation Induction in Tracheostomized Patients: Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane\",\"authors\":\"E. Kerem, Erkalp Nuran Kalekoglu, E. Veysel, Korkut Arzu Yasemin, Abut Yesim Cokay\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2377-4630/1410089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Inhalation induction (II) of anesthesia is a commonly used method in difficult airway management, pediatric anesthesia and also tracheostomized patients’ surgical practices. Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most common inhalation agents for II in these procedures of patients. We demonstrated that II with sevoflurane or desflurane in tracheostomized patients who are not studied up until now and their outcomes. Cardiorespiratory changes in II should be the same in tracheostomized patients with desflurane compared to sevoflurane. Methods: We studied 60 adult tracheostomized patients (ASA physical status 2 or 3), scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for II. Following 1 mg midazolam and 1 μg/kg fentanyl, all patients were intubated via tracheostomy with a montandon tracheostomy tube. In the Group D, patients were firstly instructed to breath and then they immediately started using desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Desflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 3% and increased by 1% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 12%. In the Group S, patients were also instructed to breathe firstly and then they immediately started using sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Sevoflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 1% and increased by 0.3% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 6%. Hemodynamic values [(SpO2, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (MAP)], respiratory complications (coughing, bronchospasm, desaturation, breath-holding), purposeful movement of limbs, secretions requiring removal by suction, time to loss of response to command and concentration of expired inhalation agent (desflurane or sevoflurane) were recorded for 10 minutes of II. Mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage were used for descriptive statistics with SSPS 20.0. Results: Couching, bronchospasm, desaturation, breathholding and purposeful movements distributions did not show any differences in Group D and Group S. Requirement of secretion removal was higher in Group D. Hemodynamic values were more stable in Group S. Conclusion: In tracheostomized patients’ II; desflurane has similar airway irritation with sevoflurane but II is more stable with sevoflurane than desflurane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:吸入诱导麻醉(II)是困难气道管理、儿童麻醉以及气管造口患者手术实践中常用的方法。七氟醚和地氟醚是这些手术中最常见的II吸入剂。我们证明了在气管造口患者中使用七氟醚或地氟醚的II,这些患者至今尚未进行研究及其结果。与七氟醚相比,地氟醚气管造口患者II期的心肺变化应相同。方法:我们研究了60名成年气管造口患者(ASA身体状况2或3),计划在全麻下进行选择性手术。患者被随机分配接受地氟醚(D组)或七氟醚(S组)治疗II。在服用1 mg咪达唑仑和1μg/kg芬太尼后,所有患者均通过气管造口术进行插管。在D组中,患者首先被指示呼吸,然后他们立即开始使用地氟醚和50%的氧气中的一氧化二氮(3/3L)。地氟醚的吸入浓度为3%,在耐受的情况下,每4-6次呼吸增加1%,最高可达12%。在S组中,患者也被要求首先呼吸,然后立即开始使用七氟醚和50%的氧化亚氮(3/3L)。七氟醚的吸入浓度为1%,在耐受的情况下,每4-6次呼吸增加0.3%,最高可达6%。在II的10分钟内记录血液动力学值[(SpO2、心率(HR)和动脉压(MAP)]、呼吸并发症(咳嗽、支气管痉挛、去饱和、屏气)、肢体有目的的运动、需要通过抽吸去除的分泌物、对命令失去反应的时间和过期吸入剂(地氟醚或七氟醚)的浓度。平均值、标准差、频率和百分比用于SSPS 20.0的描述性统计。结果:D组和S组的Couching、支气管痉挛、去饱和、屏气和有目的运动的分布没有任何差异。D组对分泌物清除的要求更高。S组的血液动力学值更稳定;地氟醚对气道的刺激与七氟醚相似,但七氟醚对II的刺激比地氟醚更稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inhalation Induction in Tracheostomized Patients: Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane
Background: Inhalation induction (II) of anesthesia is a commonly used method in difficult airway management, pediatric anesthesia and also tracheostomized patients’ surgical practices. Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most common inhalation agents for II in these procedures of patients. We demonstrated that II with sevoflurane or desflurane in tracheostomized patients who are not studied up until now and their outcomes. Cardiorespiratory changes in II should be the same in tracheostomized patients with desflurane compared to sevoflurane. Methods: We studied 60 adult tracheostomized patients (ASA physical status 2 or 3), scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for II. Following 1 mg midazolam and 1 μg/kg fentanyl, all patients were intubated via tracheostomy with a montandon tracheostomy tube. In the Group D, patients were firstly instructed to breath and then they immediately started using desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Desflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 3% and increased by 1% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 12%. In the Group S, patients were also instructed to breathe firstly and then they immediately started using sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Sevoflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 1% and increased by 0.3% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 6%. Hemodynamic values [(SpO2, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (MAP)], respiratory complications (coughing, bronchospasm, desaturation, breath-holding), purposeful movement of limbs, secretions requiring removal by suction, time to loss of response to command and concentration of expired inhalation agent (desflurane or sevoflurane) were recorded for 10 minutes of II. Mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage were used for descriptive statistics with SSPS 20.0. Results: Couching, bronchospasm, desaturation, breathholding and purposeful movements distributions did not show any differences in Group D and Group S. Requirement of secretion removal was higher in Group D. Hemodynamic values were more stable in Group S. Conclusion: In tracheostomized patients’ II; desflurane has similar airway irritation with sevoflurane but II is more stable with sevoflurane than desflurane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Trapezius Plane Block: Extended Use in Perioperative Pain Management in Nerve Transfer Surgeries A Questionnaire-Based Survey of Perioperative Utilisation of Ultrasound among Anaesthesiology Residents Pseudo Hypoxic Brain Swelling - An Unanticipated Life-Threatening Complication in Neurosurgery - Report of Two Cases with Review of Literature Anesthetic Management of the Case of Removal of Tracheobronchial Foreign Body in a Whistling Child: A Case Report The Use of the Liposomal Bupivacaine in the Quadratus Lumborum Block and Early Surgery Are Key Elements in Facilitating Ambulatory Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1