理解人类环境体验的质量和包容性

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geography Compass Pub Date : 2023-08-05 DOI:10.1111/gec3.12723
Andrew K. Palmer, Mark Riley, Beth F. T. Brockett, Karl L. Evans, Laurence Jones, Sarah Clement
{"title":"理解人类环境体验的质量和包容性","authors":"Andrew K. Palmer,&nbsp;Mark Riley,&nbsp;Beth F. T. Brockett,&nbsp;Karl L. Evans,&nbsp;Laurence Jones,&nbsp;Sarah Clement","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As calls grow for relational approaches to nature and wellbeing research that consider reciprocity in human-environment interactions, the concept of affordances is gaining importance as a useful way of thinking about nature experiences. Affordances provide a framework to enable individualised conceptions of nature by focusing on what is functionally meaningful to people. However, affordance thinking is currently limited in its ability to help us understand how peoples' background, culture and circumstances shape interactions with nature - a critical issue with respect to inclusivity and the under-representation of some sections of society. Bourdieu's theory of practice is a well-established set of ‘thinking tools’ which potentially help addresses these influences. It examines how our social environment may pattern our practices, attitudes, and perceptions. In this paper, we review the various applications of affordances before providing an overview of how Bourdieu's concepts of <i>habitus</i>, <i>capital</i> and <i>field</i> can complement, and be integrated with, affordance thinking for novel applications to greenspace research. Bridging these areas of thinking will facilitate development of a more intersectional and complete understanding of nature experiences, including the quality and inclusivity of green and natural spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12723","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human-environment experiences\",\"authors\":\"Andrew K. Palmer,&nbsp;Mark Riley,&nbsp;Beth F. T. Brockett,&nbsp;Karl L. Evans,&nbsp;Laurence Jones,&nbsp;Sarah Clement\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gec3.12723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As calls grow for relational approaches to nature and wellbeing research that consider reciprocity in human-environment interactions, the concept of affordances is gaining importance as a useful way of thinking about nature experiences. Affordances provide a framework to enable individualised conceptions of nature by focusing on what is functionally meaningful to people. However, affordance thinking is currently limited in its ability to help us understand how peoples' background, culture and circumstances shape interactions with nature - a critical issue with respect to inclusivity and the under-representation of some sections of society. Bourdieu's theory of practice is a well-established set of ‘thinking tools’ which potentially help addresses these influences. It examines how our social environment may pattern our practices, attitudes, and perceptions. In this paper, we review the various applications of affordances before providing an overview of how Bourdieu's concepts of <i>habitus</i>, <i>capital</i> and <i>field</i> can complement, and be integrated with, affordance thinking for novel applications to greenspace research. Bridging these areas of thinking will facilitate development of a more intersectional and complete understanding of nature experiences, including the quality and inclusivity of green and natural spaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geography Compass\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12723\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geography Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12723\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人们越来越多地呼吁采用关系方法来研究自然和福祉,考虑人与环境互动中的互惠性,可供性的概念作为思考自然体验的一种有用方式越来越重要。绿化提供了一个框架,通过关注对人们有功能意义的东西,实现个性化的自然概念。然而,可供性思维目前在帮助我们理解人们的背景、文化和环境如何塑造与自然的互动方面的能力有限,这是一个关于包容性和社会某些阶层代表性不足的关键问题。布迪厄的实践理论是一套成熟的“思维工具”,可能有助于解决这些影响。它考察了我们的社会环境如何影响我们的实践、态度和观念。在这篇论文中,我们回顾了可供性的各种应用,然后概述了布迪厄的习惯、资本和场的概念如何补充并与可供性思维相结合,从而在绿地研究中获得新的应用。衔接这些思维领域将有助于对自然体验,包括绿色和自然空间的质量和包容性,形成更具交叉性和完整性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human-environment experiences

As calls grow for relational approaches to nature and wellbeing research that consider reciprocity in human-environment interactions, the concept of affordances is gaining importance as a useful way of thinking about nature experiences. Affordances provide a framework to enable individualised conceptions of nature by focusing on what is functionally meaningful to people. However, affordance thinking is currently limited in its ability to help us understand how peoples' background, culture and circumstances shape interactions with nature - a critical issue with respect to inclusivity and the under-representation of some sections of society. Bourdieu's theory of practice is a well-established set of ‘thinking tools’ which potentially help addresses these influences. It examines how our social environment may pattern our practices, attitudes, and perceptions. In this paper, we review the various applications of affordances before providing an overview of how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can complement, and be integrated with, affordance thinking for novel applications to greenspace research. Bridging these areas of thinking will facilitate development of a more intersectional and complete understanding of nature experiences, including the quality and inclusivity of green and natural spaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Historical Geographies of Engineering: Knowledges, Practices, Identities Big Data (R)evolution in Geography: Complexity Modelling in the Last Two Decades The Legal Geographies of Contracts: A Method on Formation, Substance and Enforcement Disrupting the Chrononormativity of Geographies of Youth and Youth Studies: Learning From Infractions at the Border Defining Climate Finance Justice: Critical Geographies of Justice Amid Financialized Climate Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1