金融准入是否提高了农业技术效率?——来自中国两个家庭农场示范区的证据

IF 4.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY China Agricultural Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI:10.1108/caer-07-2020-0169
Zhigang Chen, Ying Zhang, Li Zhou
{"title":"金融准入是否提高了农业技术效率?——来自中国两个家庭农场示范区的证据","authors":"Zhigang Chen, Ying Zhang, Li Zhou","doi":"10.1108/caer-07-2020-0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeFinance is crucial to boosting agricultural development in developing countries. This paper aims to investigate the effects of rural formal and informal financial access on agricultural technical efficiency (TE) in China.Design/methodology/approachBased on the survey data of demonstrative family farms in Langxi county, Anhui province and Wuhan city, Hubei province in central China in 2017, this research assesses agricultural TE by using a three-stage DEA model. It adopts the tobit model to evaluate the effects of formal and informal financial access on TE, and to explore the heterogeneous effects by types, management states and scales. It uses the OLS regression and PSM method to check the robustness, and applies the IV-Tobit method to solve the endogeneity. The authors apply the mediation effect model to explore the channels through which financial access impacts TE.FindingsFamily farms' average TE reaches 13.9%, which shows much room for improvement under the given technical conditions and constant inputs. The research confirms the advantage of formal financial access in raising TE relative to informal financial access. The heterogeneous analysis documents more prominent effects of formal financial access on enhancing TE of aquaculture, hybrid, demonstration and large farms. The mediating effect model reveals that the enhancing TE effect of formal financial access derives from improved machinery investment and family labor division rather than land circulation.Originality/valueThe research clarifies finance into formal and informal finance. The results have considerable policy implications for rural financial policies in China.","PeriodicalId":10095,"journal":{"name":"China Agricultural Economic Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has financial access improved agricultural technical efficiency? – evidence from two family farm demonstration zones in China\",\"authors\":\"Zhigang Chen, Ying Zhang, Li Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/caer-07-2020-0169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeFinance is crucial to boosting agricultural development in developing countries. This paper aims to investigate the effects of rural formal and informal financial access on agricultural technical efficiency (TE) in China.Design/methodology/approachBased on the survey data of demonstrative family farms in Langxi county, Anhui province and Wuhan city, Hubei province in central China in 2017, this research assesses agricultural TE by using a three-stage DEA model. It adopts the tobit model to evaluate the effects of formal and informal financial access on TE, and to explore the heterogeneous effects by types, management states and scales. It uses the OLS regression and PSM method to check the robustness, and applies the IV-Tobit method to solve the endogeneity. The authors apply the mediation effect model to explore the channels through which financial access impacts TE.FindingsFamily farms' average TE reaches 13.9%, which shows much room for improvement under the given technical conditions and constant inputs. The research confirms the advantage of formal financial access in raising TE relative to informal financial access. The heterogeneous analysis documents more prominent effects of formal financial access on enhancing TE of aquaculture, hybrid, demonstration and large farms. The mediating effect model reveals that the enhancing TE effect of formal financial access derives from improved machinery investment and family labor division rather than land circulation.Originality/valueThe research clarifies finance into formal and informal finance. The results have considerable policy implications for rural financial policies in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Agricultural Economic Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Agricultural Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-07-2020-0169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Agricultural Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-07-2020-0169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的金融对于促进发展中国家的农业发展至关重要。本文旨在研究中国农村正规和非正规金融渠道对农业技术效率的影响。设计/方法/方法基于2017年安徽省郎溪县和湖北省武汉市示范家庭农场的调查数据,采用三阶段DEA模型对农业技术效率进行评估。它采用tobit模型来评估正式和非正式金融准入对TE的影响,并按类型、管理状态和规模探讨异质性影响。它使用OLS回归和PSM方法来检验稳健性,并应用IV-Tobit方法来解决内生性。作者应用中介效应模型来探索金融准入影响TE的渠道。芬丁家庭农场的平均TE达到13.9%,这表明在给定的技术条件和持续投入下有很大的改进空间。这项研究证实了正规金融渠道相对于非正规金融渠道在提高TE方面的优势。异质性分析记录了正式财政准入对提高水产养殖、杂交养殖、示范养殖和大型养殖场TE的更突出影响。中介效应模型表明,正规金融准入的TE效应增强源于机械投资和家庭分工的改善,而不是土地流转。原创性/价值研究将金融分为正式金融和非正式金融。研究结果对我国农村金融政策具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Has financial access improved agricultural technical efficiency? – evidence from two family farm demonstration zones in China
PurposeFinance is crucial to boosting agricultural development in developing countries. This paper aims to investigate the effects of rural formal and informal financial access on agricultural technical efficiency (TE) in China.Design/methodology/approachBased on the survey data of demonstrative family farms in Langxi county, Anhui province and Wuhan city, Hubei province in central China in 2017, this research assesses agricultural TE by using a three-stage DEA model. It adopts the tobit model to evaluate the effects of formal and informal financial access on TE, and to explore the heterogeneous effects by types, management states and scales. It uses the OLS regression and PSM method to check the robustness, and applies the IV-Tobit method to solve the endogeneity. The authors apply the mediation effect model to explore the channels through which financial access impacts TE.FindingsFamily farms' average TE reaches 13.9%, which shows much room for improvement under the given technical conditions and constant inputs. The research confirms the advantage of formal financial access in raising TE relative to informal financial access. The heterogeneous analysis documents more prominent effects of formal financial access on enhancing TE of aquaculture, hybrid, demonstration and large farms. The mediating effect model reveals that the enhancing TE effect of formal financial access derives from improved machinery investment and family labor division rather than land circulation.Originality/valueThe research clarifies finance into formal and informal finance. The results have considerable policy implications for rural financial policies in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural Economic Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published in association with China Agricultural University and the Chinese Association for Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural Economic Review publishes academic writings by international scholars, and particularly encourages empirical work that can be replicated and extended by others; and research articles that employ econometric and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models. The journal aims to publish research which can be applied to China’s agricultural and rural policy-making process, the development of the agricultural economics discipline and to developing countries hoping to learn from China’s agricultural and rural development.
期刊最新文献
Impact of agricultural land ownership on child nutrition in rural Sudan: an investigation across gender Typologies of South African small-scale farmers and their risk perceptions: an unsupervised machine learning approach Trade and energy efficiency: theory and evidence How do digital media strengthen the role of social networks in promoting farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures? Saving farm subsidies with smart climate interventions: the case of transition to a millet-based agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1