宽泛的机会创造者还是选择性的机会接受者?英语第三部门社会服务中的位置敏捷性与战术社交技巧

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Civil Society Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626
A. Body, J. Kendall
{"title":"宽泛的机会创造者还是选择性的机会接受者?英语第三部门社会服务中的位置敏捷性与战术社交技巧","authors":"A. Body, J. Kendall","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a challenging climate of austerity policies, relationships between Third Sector Organizations (TSOs) and the State are often contentious, with great sophistication required to secure a reasonable degree of stability and continuity in services and relationships. This article draws on data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 23 CEOs of TSOs focused on children’s preventative services to explicate and exemplify the skills embodied in TSOs which allow them to navigate these complex situations relatively successfully. We draw on the concept of ‘social skill’ as developed in strategic action fields theory to frame an analysis of this data. We consider how TSOs have collectively helped shape the political and economic conditions under which they operate, and present a range of skilful tactics we associate with the concept of ‘positional agility’ which differentiate those organizations which are especially accomplished in navigating relationships and resources.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"16 1","pages":"15 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expansive opportunity makers but selective opportunity takers? Positional agility and tactical social skill in English third sector social service\",\"authors\":\"A. Body, J. Kendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In a challenging climate of austerity policies, relationships between Third Sector Organizations (TSOs) and the State are often contentious, with great sophistication required to secure a reasonable degree of stability and continuity in services and relationships. This article draws on data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 23 CEOs of TSOs focused on children’s preventative services to explicate and exemplify the skills embodied in TSOs which allow them to navigate these complex situations relatively successfully. We draw on the concept of ‘social skill’ as developed in strategic action fields theory to frame an analysis of this data. We consider how TSOs have collectively helped shape the political and economic conditions under which they operate, and present a range of skilful tactics we associate with the concept of ‘positional agility’ which differentiate those organizations which are especially accomplished in navigating relationships and resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1719626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在紧缩政策具有挑战性的环境下,第三部门组织(tso)与国家之间的关系经常存在争议,需要高度的复杂性来确保服务和关系的合理程度的稳定性和连续性。本文通过对23名从事儿童预防服务的TSOs首席执行官进行半结构化访谈收集数据,以解释和举例说明TSOs所体现的技能,这些技能使他们能够相对成功地应对这些复杂的情况。我们利用战略行动领域理论中发展起来的“社交技能”概念来对这些数据进行分析。我们考虑了tso是如何共同帮助塑造其运作所处的政治和经济条件的,并提出了一系列与“位置敏捷性”概念相关的技巧策略,这些策略将那些在驾驭关系和资源方面特别成功的组织区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expansive opportunity makers but selective opportunity takers? Positional agility and tactical social skill in English third sector social service
ABSTRACT In a challenging climate of austerity policies, relationships between Third Sector Organizations (TSOs) and the State are often contentious, with great sophistication required to secure a reasonable degree of stability and continuity in services and relationships. This article draws on data gathered through semi-structured interviews with 23 CEOs of TSOs focused on children’s preventative services to explicate and exemplify the skills embodied in TSOs which allow them to navigate these complex situations relatively successfully. We draw on the concept of ‘social skill’ as developed in strategic action fields theory to frame an analysis of this data. We consider how TSOs have collectively helped shape the political and economic conditions under which they operate, and present a range of skilful tactics we associate with the concept of ‘positional agility’ which differentiate those organizations which are especially accomplished in navigating relationships and resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Youth worldlessness and civic participation online and at school: Exploring Arendt’s philosophy Beyond the Immediate Effects of COVID-19: Exploring the Consequences of the Pandemic on the Southern NGO Partners of Dutch INGOs Renegotiating state-third sector relations through collaborative partnerships: The case of reception services for asylum-seeking children in Gothenburg, Sweden Consultation not Contestation : Brazilian civil society in EU-Mercosur Association Agreement negotiations Faith standing out? Discovering the particularities of faith-based antitrafficking organizations in Thailand and Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1