儿童的共同与自决权:一个比较的法律分析

Marta Prucnal-Wójcik, Helen Beckmann-Hamzei, Münevver Dal
{"title":"儿童的共同与自决权:一个比较的法律分析","authors":"Marta Prucnal-Wójcik, Helen Beckmann-Hamzei, Münevver Dal","doi":"10.35765/hw.2022.2160.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to present a comparative analysis of selected European countries’ legal regulations for issues concerning a child’s right to co- and self-determination when those who care for them (under parental responsibility, custody, legal guardianship, etc.) make decisions about their personal life. \nTHE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns whether a child can co-decide or independently make decisions in matters concerning their person or property and, if so, what the scope of this right is. In investigating these questions, the authors used the theoretical and dogmatic legal method as well as the method of analysis (and synthesis) of relevant legal provisions of selected European countries. \nTHE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In their analysis of the provisions in force in the in- ternal legislation of selected European countries (Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the Netherlands), the authors present the adopted legal solutions for regulating issues related to rights that a child is entitled to when making decisions about their personal life and the responsibilities of parents caring for a child. \nRESEARCH RESULTS: The legislation of each of the five selected countries gives a child under the care of parents the right to co-determination/self-determination when making decisions about their personal life, although there are noticeable differences between individual national systems. \nCONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the editorial limitations on the length of the article, the authors have limited the analysis to the legislation of five selected European countries and to a general analysis of national laws regulating the research problem. In the longer term, a more in-depth analysis of such provisions seems justified. It also would be interesting to analyze the legal solutions in force in other countries, both European and non-European.","PeriodicalId":53094,"journal":{"name":"Horyzonty Wychowania","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Child’s Right to Co- and Self-determination: A Comparative Legal Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Marta Prucnal-Wójcik, Helen Beckmann-Hamzei, Münevver Dal\",\"doi\":\"10.35765/hw.2022.2160.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to present a comparative analysis of selected European countries’ legal regulations for issues concerning a child’s right to co- and self-determination when those who care for them (under parental responsibility, custody, legal guardianship, etc.) make decisions about their personal life. \\nTHE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns whether a child can co-decide or independently make decisions in matters concerning their person or property and, if so, what the scope of this right is. In investigating these questions, the authors used the theoretical and dogmatic legal method as well as the method of analysis (and synthesis) of relevant legal provisions of selected European countries. \\nTHE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In their analysis of the provisions in force in the in- ternal legislation of selected European countries (Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the Netherlands), the authors present the adopted legal solutions for regulating issues related to rights that a child is entitled to when making decisions about their personal life and the responsibilities of parents caring for a child. \\nRESEARCH RESULTS: The legislation of each of the five selected countries gives a child under the care of parents the right to co-determination/self-determination when making decisions about their personal life, although there are noticeable differences between individual national systems. \\nCONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the editorial limitations on the length of the article, the authors have limited the analysis to the legislation of five selected European countries and to a general analysis of national laws regulating the research problem. In the longer term, a more in-depth analysis of such provisions seems justified. It also would be interesting to analyze the legal solutions in force in other countries, both European and non-European.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horyzonty Wychowania\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horyzonty Wychowania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2022.2160.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horyzonty Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2022.2160.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本文的目的是对选定的欧洲国家在照顾儿童的人(在父母责任、监护权、法定监护权等下)决定其个人生活时,就儿童的共同权利和自决权问题制定的法律法规进行比较分析。研究问题和方法:研究问题涉及儿童是否可以共同决定或独立决定与他们的人身或财产有关的事项,如果可以,这项权利的范围是什么。在调查这些问题时,作者采用了理论和教条主义的法律方法,以及对选定的欧洲国家的相关法律条款进行分析(和综合)的方法。辩论过程:在对选定欧洲国家(德国、挪威、波兰、瑞典和荷兰)内部立法中有效条款的分析中,作者提出了已通过的法律解决方案,以规范与儿童在决定其个人生活和父母照顾儿童的责任时有权享有的权利有关的问题。研究结果:五个选定国家的立法都赋予受父母照顾的儿童在决定个人生活时共同决定/自决的权利,尽管各个国家的制度之间存在明显差异。结论、创新和建议:由于文章篇幅的编辑限制,作者仅对五个选定的欧洲国家的立法进行分析,并对规范研究问题的国家法律进行一般分析。从长远来看,对这些条款进行更深入的分析似乎是合理的。分析其他国家(包括欧洲和非欧洲国家)现行的法律解决方案也很有意思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Child’s Right to Co- and Self-determination: A Comparative Legal Analysis
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The aim of the article is to present a comparative analysis of selected European countries’ legal regulations for issues concerning a child’s right to co- and self-determination when those who care for them (under parental responsibility, custody, legal guardianship, etc.) make decisions about their personal life. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The research problem concerns whether a child can co-decide or independently make decisions in matters concerning their person or property and, if so, what the scope of this right is. In investigating these questions, the authors used the theoretical and dogmatic legal method as well as the method of analysis (and synthesis) of relevant legal provisions of selected European countries. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: In their analysis of the provisions in force in the in- ternal legislation of selected European countries (Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the Netherlands), the authors present the adopted legal solutions for regulating issues related to rights that a child is entitled to when making decisions about their personal life and the responsibilities of parents caring for a child. RESEARCH RESULTS: The legislation of each of the five selected countries gives a child under the care of parents the right to co-determination/self-determination when making decisions about their personal life, although there are noticeable differences between individual national systems. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the editorial limitations on the length of the article, the authors have limited the analysis to the legislation of five selected European countries and to a general analysis of national laws regulating the research problem. In the longer term, a more in-depth analysis of such provisions seems justified. It also would be interesting to analyze the legal solutions in force in other countries, both European and non-European.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Attitudes of Czech Teachers Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Schools Edytorial: Edukacja w dobie sztucznej inteligencji Wolność podmiotów edukacyjnych a problem odpowiedzialności moralnej za edukację Mediacje w szkole: od konfliktu do demokracji The Etykieta „obcego” w instytucji totalizującej. Adaptacja (pod) kulturowa młodzieży pochodzenia ukraińskiego w placówkach resocjalizacyjnych
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1