消费者对他们如何在网上被搜索的关注

Caroline Moraes
{"title":"消费者对他们如何在网上被搜索的关注","authors":"Caroline Moraes","doi":"10.5840/BPEJ2016122853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased consumer usage of the internet has highlighted a number of problematic online marketing practices, including the use of online platforms to research consumers without full consumer awareness. Despite current debates regarding online research ethics from a marketing perspective, scant research has been published on consumers’ concerns with how they are researched online, which is a knowledge gap this paper seeks to address through qualitative research with UK consumers. This is an important yet neglected topic, given that consumer voices have been under-represented in the online research ethics debate over the years. The paper makes a significant theoretical contribution as it extends the ethics of care and responsibility to an online context, which can frame ongoing online research ethics discussions where problematic power asymmetries may exist between researchers and consumers.","PeriodicalId":53983,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","volume":"36 1","pages":"79-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers' Concerns with How They Are Researched Online\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/BPEJ2016122853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased consumer usage of the internet has highlighted a number of problematic online marketing practices, including the use of online platforms to research consumers without full consumer awareness. Despite current debates regarding online research ethics from a marketing perspective, scant research has been published on consumers’ concerns with how they are researched online, which is a knowledge gap this paper seeks to address through qualitative research with UK consumers. This is an important yet neglected topic, given that consumer voices have been under-represented in the online research ethics debate over the years. The paper makes a significant theoretical contribution as it extends the ethics of care and responsibility to an online context, which can frame ongoing online research ethics discussions where problematic power asymmetries may exist between researchers and consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"79-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2016122853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/BPEJ2016122853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

消费者对互联网使用的增加凸显了一些有问题的在线营销做法,包括在没有充分消费者意识的情况下使用在线平台研究消费者。尽管目前从营销角度对在线研究伦理存在争议,但很少有研究表明消费者对如何在网上进行研究的担忧,这是本文试图通过对英国消费者的定性研究来解决的知识差距。这是一个重要但被忽视的话题,因为多年来,消费者的声音在网络研究伦理辩论中的代表性一直不足。这篇论文在理论上做出了重大贡献,因为它将关怀和责任伦理扩展到了网络环境中,这可以构建正在进行的在线研究伦理讨论,在这些讨论中,研究人员和消费者之间可能存在有问题的权力不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers' Concerns with How They Are Researched Online
Increased consumer usage of the internet has highlighted a number of problematic online marketing practices, including the use of online platforms to research consumers without full consumer awareness. Despite current debates regarding online research ethics from a marketing perspective, scant research has been published on consumers’ concerns with how they are researched online, which is a knowledge gap this paper seeks to address through qualitative research with UK consumers. This is an important yet neglected topic, given that consumer voices have been under-represented in the online research ethics debate over the years. The paper makes a significant theoretical contribution as it extends the ethics of care and responsibility to an online context, which can frame ongoing online research ethics discussions where problematic power asymmetries may exist between researchers and consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Autonomy and Subordination Applying Kant’s Ethics to Video Game Business Models A Necessary Ethics Definition for Conflicts of Interest Examining Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Motivators of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior Intolerable Ideologies and the Obligation to Discriminate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1