肥胖症手术治疗后患者的翻修手术:一项多中心波兰翻修型肥胖症手术研究(PROSS)

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2022.114525
P. Major, P. Zarzycki, Justyna Rymarowicz, M. Wysocki, Michał Łabul, H. R. Hady, Paulina Głuszyńska, P. Myśliwiec, Grzegorz Kowalski, M. Orłowski, J. Szeliga, Wojciech Kupczyk, W. Tarnowski, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-gornowicz, M. Proczko-Stepaniak, M. Walędziak, P. Szymanski, T. Stefura, M. Pędziwiatr
{"title":"肥胖症手术治疗后患者的翻修手术:一项多中心波兰翻修型肥胖症手术研究(PROSS)","authors":"P. Major, P. Zarzycki, Justyna Rymarowicz, M. Wysocki, Michał Łabul, H. R. Hady, Paulina Głuszyńska, P. Myśliwiec, Grzegorz Kowalski, M. Orłowski, J. Szeliga, Wojciech Kupczyk, W. Tarnowski, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-gornowicz, M. Proczko-Stepaniak, M. Walędziak, P. Szymanski, T. Stefura, M. Pędziwiatr","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2022.114525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Revisional surgery is more technically challenging and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the frequency of revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is increasing. Therefore, investigating this group of patients appears to be currently valid. Aim The objective of this multicenter study was to collect, systematize and present the available data on RBS after surgical treatment of morbid obesity among Polish patients. Material and methods This multicenter study included a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes included an analysis of the indications for RBS, the type of surgery most frequently chosen as RBS and the course of the perioperative period of treatment among patients undergoing RBS. Results The group consisted of 799 patients (624 (78.1%) women, 175 (21.9%) men). The mean age was 38.96 ±9.72 years. Recurrence of obesity was the most common indication for RBS. The most frequently performed RBS procedures were one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) – 294 (36.8%) patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) – 289 (36.17%) patients and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) – 172 (21.52%) patients. After primary surgery 63.58% of patients achieved sufficient weight loss, but after RBS only 38.87%. Complications were noted in 222 (27.78%) cases after RBS with GERD being the most common – 117 (14.64%) patients. Conclusions RBS most often concerns patients after SG. The main indication for RBS is weight regain. OAGB and RYGB were the two most frequently chosen types of RBS. Secondary operations lead to further weight reduction. However, RBS are associated with a significant risk of complications.","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"17 1","pages":"372 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisional operations among patients after surgical treatment of obesity: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS)\",\"authors\":\"P. Major, P. Zarzycki, Justyna Rymarowicz, M. Wysocki, Michał Łabul, H. R. Hady, Paulina Głuszyńska, P. Myśliwiec, Grzegorz Kowalski, M. Orłowski, J. Szeliga, Wojciech Kupczyk, W. Tarnowski, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-gornowicz, M. Proczko-Stepaniak, M. Walędziak, P. Szymanski, T. Stefura, M. Pędziwiatr\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wiitm.2022.114525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Revisional surgery is more technically challenging and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the frequency of revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is increasing. Therefore, investigating this group of patients appears to be currently valid. Aim The objective of this multicenter study was to collect, systematize and present the available data on RBS after surgical treatment of morbid obesity among Polish patients. Material and methods This multicenter study included a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes included an analysis of the indications for RBS, the type of surgery most frequently chosen as RBS and the course of the perioperative period of treatment among patients undergoing RBS. Results The group consisted of 799 patients (624 (78.1%) women, 175 (21.9%) men). The mean age was 38.96 ±9.72 years. Recurrence of obesity was the most common indication for RBS. The most frequently performed RBS procedures were one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) – 294 (36.8%) patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) – 289 (36.17%) patients and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) – 172 (21.52%) patients. After primary surgery 63.58% of patients achieved sufficient weight loss, but after RBS only 38.87%. Complications were noted in 222 (27.78%) cases after RBS with GERD being the most common – 117 (14.64%) patients. Conclusions RBS most often concerns patients after SG. The main indication for RBS is weight regain. OAGB and RYGB were the two most frequently chosen types of RBS. Secondary operations lead to further weight reduction. However, RBS are associated with a significant risk of complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"372 - 379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2022.114525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2022.114525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

修复手术在技术上更具挑战性,并且与发病率和死亡率增加有关。然而,修正减肥手术(RBS)的频率正在增加。因此,对这组患者进行调查似乎是目前有效的。目的:本多中心研究的目的是收集、系统化和呈现波兰患者手术治疗后病态肥胖的RBS数据。材料和方法本多中心研究包括对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析。结果包括分析RBS的适应症、RBS最常选择的手术类型以及接受RBS患者的围手术期治疗过程。结果本组共799例患者,其中女性624例(78.1%),男性175例(21.9%)。平均年龄38.96±9.72岁。肥胖复发是RBS最常见的适应症。最常见的RBS手术是一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB) 294例(36.8%),Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB) 289例(36.17%)和袖胃切除术(SG) 172例(21.52%)。初次手术后63.58%的患者达到了足够的体重减轻,而RBS后仅为38.87%。RBS术后出现并发症222例(27.78%),其中以胃食管反流最为常见,117例(14.64%)。结论:RBS最常发生在SG后。RBS的主要症状是体重反弹。OAGB和RYGB是两种最常被选择的RBS类型。二次手术可进一步减轻重量。然而,RBS与并发症的显著风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisional operations among patients after surgical treatment of obesity: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS)
Introduction Revisional surgery is more technically challenging and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the frequency of revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is increasing. Therefore, investigating this group of patients appears to be currently valid. Aim The objective of this multicenter study was to collect, systematize and present the available data on RBS after surgical treatment of morbid obesity among Polish patients. Material and methods This multicenter study included a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes included an analysis of the indications for RBS, the type of surgery most frequently chosen as RBS and the course of the perioperative period of treatment among patients undergoing RBS. Results The group consisted of 799 patients (624 (78.1%) women, 175 (21.9%) men). The mean age was 38.96 ±9.72 years. Recurrence of obesity was the most common indication for RBS. The most frequently performed RBS procedures were one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) – 294 (36.8%) patients, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) – 289 (36.17%) patients and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) – 172 (21.52%) patients. After primary surgery 63.58% of patients achieved sufficient weight loss, but after RBS only 38.87%. Complications were noted in 222 (27.78%) cases after RBS with GERD being the most common – 117 (14.64%) patients. Conclusions RBS most often concerns patients after SG. The main indication for RBS is weight regain. OAGB and RYGB were the two most frequently chosen types of RBS. Secondary operations lead to further weight reduction. However, RBS are associated with a significant risk of complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
期刊最新文献
Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video) Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis: who benefits the most? Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and open partial splenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1