《金瓶梅》中的奴隶制与体裁

IF 0.5 4区 历史学 0 ASIAN STUDIES HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-11-09 DOI:10.1353/jas.2021.0012
Tina Lu
{"title":"《金瓶梅》中的奴隶制与体裁","authors":"Tina Lu","doi":"10.1353/jas.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In this article, I argue for a reading of the long fiction Plum in the Golden Vase that does not simply excavate the text for facts but instead considers the genres of Ming imaginative literature as theories of social hierarchy. The novel’s sui generis form can be understood, I argue, as a socially symbolic act, particularly relating to the trafficking of human beings and especially of women. The Plum in the Golden Vase places at the very core of society the radical transactability of women. Finally, I interpret seventeenth- century debates about the text—namely, how to rehabilitate the text from its sexual content by reading these debates as relating not merely to aesthetics but also to social theory.摘要:本文以《金瓶梅》為例,論述明代想像性文學的各種文體体現了社會等級 制度的理論。《金瓶梅》自成一體的形式可被理解為與販賣人口,特別是販賣女 性相關的一種社會象徵行為。而十七世紀關於《金瓶梅》的辯論⸺即如何將其從 性愛內容中超拔,而讀作一个報應故事⸺不僅是一种美學探討,而且與社會理論 相關。","PeriodicalId":29948,"journal":{"name":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavery and Genre in The Plum in the Golden Vase\",\"authors\":\"Tina Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jas.2021.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:In this article, I argue for a reading of the long fiction Plum in the Golden Vase that does not simply excavate the text for facts but instead considers the genres of Ming imaginative literature as theories of social hierarchy. The novel’s sui generis form can be understood, I argue, as a socially symbolic act, particularly relating to the trafficking of human beings and especially of women. The Plum in the Golden Vase places at the very core of society the radical transactability of women. Finally, I interpret seventeenth- century debates about the text—namely, how to rehabilitate the text from its sexual content by reading these debates as relating not merely to aesthetics but also to social theory.摘要:本文以《金瓶梅》為例,論述明代想像性文學的各種文體体現了社會等級 制度的理論。《金瓶梅》自成一體的形式可被理解為與販賣人口,特別是販賣女 性相關的一種社會象徵行為。而十七世紀關於《金瓶梅》的辯論⸺即如何將其從 性愛內容中超拔,而讀作一个報應故事⸺不僅是一种美學探討,而且與社會理論 相關。\",\"PeriodicalId\":29948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2021.0012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HARVARD JOURNAL OF ASIATIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jas.2021.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

abstract:In this article, I argue for a reading of the long fiction Plum in the Golden Vase that does not simply excavate the text for facts but instead considers the genres of Ming imaginative literature as theories of social hierarchy. The novel’s sui generis form can be understood, I argue, as a socially symbolic act, particularly relating to the trafficking of human beings and especially of women. The Plum in the Golden Vase places at the very core of society the radical transactability of women. Finally, I interpret seventeenth- century debates about the text—namely, how to rehabilitate the text from its sexual content by reading these debates as relating not merely to aesthetics but also to social theory.摘要:本文以《金瓶梅》为例,论述明代想像性文学的各种文体体现了社会等级 制度的理论。《金瓶梅》自成一体的形式可被理解为与贩卖人口,特别是贩卖女 性相关的一种社会象征行为。而十七世纪关于《金瓶梅》的辩论⸺即如何将其从 性爱内容中超拔,而读作一个报应故事⸺不仅是一种美学探讨,而且与社会理论 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slavery and Genre in The Plum in the Golden Vase
abstract:In this article, I argue for a reading of the long fiction Plum in the Golden Vase that does not simply excavate the text for facts but instead considers the genres of Ming imaginative literature as theories of social hierarchy. The novel’s sui generis form can be understood, I argue, as a socially symbolic act, particularly relating to the trafficking of human beings and especially of women. The Plum in the Golden Vase places at the very core of society the radical transactability of women. Finally, I interpret seventeenth- century debates about the text—namely, how to rehabilitate the text from its sexual content by reading these debates as relating not merely to aesthetics but also to social theory.摘要:本文以《金瓶梅》為例,論述明代想像性文學的各種文體体現了社會等級 制度的理論。《金瓶梅》自成一體的形式可被理解為與販賣人口,特別是販賣女 性相關的一種社會象徵行為。而十七世紀關於《金瓶梅》的辯論⸺即如何將其從 性愛內容中超拔,而讀作一个報應故事⸺不僅是一种美學探討,而且與社會理論 相關。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Preface In Search of Our Frontier: Japanese America and Settler Colonialism in the Construction of Japan’s Borderless Empire by Eiichiro Azuma (review) Buddhist Responses to Christianity in Postwar Taiwan: Awakening the World by Scott Pacey (review) Slave Donations to Buddhist Parishes in Qing Mongolia Licentious Fictions: Ninjō and the Nineteenth-Century Japanese Novel by Daniel Poch (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1