生物入侵理论:种群、群落和生态系统尺度的融合视角

O. Chabrerie, F. Massol, B. Facon, R. Thevenoux, M. Hess, R. Ulmer, J. Pantel, J. Braschi, L. Amsellem, S. Baltora-Rosset, A. Tasiemski, F. Grandjean, P. Gibert, Matthieu Chauvat, L. Affre, G. Thiébaut, F. Viard, E. Forey, L. Folcher, T. Boivin, E. Buisson, D. Richardson, D. Renault
{"title":"生物入侵理论:种群、群落和生态系统尺度的融合视角","authors":"O. Chabrerie, F. Massol, B. Facon, R. Thevenoux, M. Hess, R. Ulmer, J. Pantel, J. Braschi, L. Amsellem, S. Baltora-Rosset, A. Tasiemski, F. Grandjean, P. Gibert, Matthieu Chauvat, L. Affre, G. Thiébaut, F. Viard, E. Forey, L. Folcher, T. Boivin, E. Buisson, D. Richardson, D. Renault","doi":"10.20944/preprints201910.0327.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biological invasions have reached an unprecedented level and the number of introduced species is still increasing worldwide. Despite major advances in invasion science, the determinants of success of introduced species, the magnitude and dimensions of their impact, and the mechanisms sustaining successful invasions are still debated. Empirical studies show divergent impacts of non-native populations on ecosystems and contrasting effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the dynamics of non-native populations; this is hindering the emergence of a unified theory of biological invasions. We propose a synthesis that merges perspectives from population, community, and ecosystem levels. Along a timeline of ecosystem transformation driven by non-native species, from historical to human-modified ecosystems, we order invasion concepts and theories to clarify their chaining and relevance during each step of the invasion process. This temporal sorting of invasion concepts shows that each concept is relevant at a specific stage of the invasion. Concepts and empirical findings on non-native species may appear contradictory. However, we suggest that, when mapped onto an invasion timeline, they may be combined in a complementary way. An overall scheme is proposed to summarise the theoretical dynamics of ecosystems subjected to invasions. For any given case study, this framework provides a guide through the maze of theories and should help choose the appropriate concepts according to the stage of invasion.","PeriodicalId":8893,"journal":{"name":"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological Invasion Theories: Merging Perspectives from Population, Community and Ecosystem Scales\",\"authors\":\"O. Chabrerie, F. Massol, B. Facon, R. Thevenoux, M. Hess, R. Ulmer, J. Pantel, J. Braschi, L. Amsellem, S. Baltora-Rosset, A. Tasiemski, F. Grandjean, P. Gibert, Matthieu Chauvat, L. Affre, G. Thiébaut, F. Viard, E. Forey, L. Folcher, T. Boivin, E. Buisson, D. Richardson, D. Renault\",\"doi\":\"10.20944/preprints201910.0327.v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biological invasions have reached an unprecedented level and the number of introduced species is still increasing worldwide. Despite major advances in invasion science, the determinants of success of introduced species, the magnitude and dimensions of their impact, and the mechanisms sustaining successful invasions are still debated. Empirical studies show divergent impacts of non-native populations on ecosystems and contrasting effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the dynamics of non-native populations; this is hindering the emergence of a unified theory of biological invasions. We propose a synthesis that merges perspectives from population, community, and ecosystem levels. Along a timeline of ecosystem transformation driven by non-native species, from historical to human-modified ecosystems, we order invasion concepts and theories to clarify their chaining and relevance during each step of the invasion process. This temporal sorting of invasion concepts shows that each concept is relevant at a specific stage of the invasion. Concepts and empirical findings on non-native species may appear contradictory. However, we suggest that, when mapped onto an invasion timeline, they may be combined in a complementary way. An overall scheme is proposed to summarise the theoretical dynamics of ecosystems subjected to invasions. For any given case study, this framework provides a guide through the maze of theories and should help choose the appropriate concepts according to the stage of invasion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201910.0327.v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201910.0327.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

生物入侵已达到前所未有的程度,世界范围内引进物种的数量仍在增加。尽管入侵科学取得了重大进展,但引进物种成功的决定因素、影响的大小和维度以及维持成功入侵的机制仍存在争议。实证研究表明,外来种群对生态系统的影响存在差异,生物因子和非生物因子对外来种群动态的影响存在差异;这阻碍了生物入侵统一理论的出现。我们提出了一个综合的观点,从人口,社区和生态系统的水平。沿着非本地物种驱动的生态系统转变的时间轴,从历史到人类改造的生态系统,我们对入侵的概念和理论进行了排序,以阐明它们在入侵过程中每个步骤的连锁和相关性。这种入侵概念的时间排序表明,每个概念在入侵的特定阶段都是相关的。关于非本地物种的概念和实证研究结果可能会出现矛盾。然而,我们建议,当映射到入侵时间线时,它们可能以互补的方式组合在一起。提出了一个总体方案来总结受入侵影响的生态系统的理论动力学。对于任何给定的案例研究,这个框架提供了一个通过理论迷宫的指南,应该有助于根据入侵阶段选择适当的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biological Invasion Theories: Merging Perspectives from Population, Community and Ecosystem Scales
Biological invasions have reached an unprecedented level and the number of introduced species is still increasing worldwide. Despite major advances in invasion science, the determinants of success of introduced species, the magnitude and dimensions of their impact, and the mechanisms sustaining successful invasions are still debated. Empirical studies show divergent impacts of non-native populations on ecosystems and contrasting effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the dynamics of non-native populations; this is hindering the emergence of a unified theory of biological invasions. We propose a synthesis that merges perspectives from population, community, and ecosystem levels. Along a timeline of ecosystem transformation driven by non-native species, from historical to human-modified ecosystems, we order invasion concepts and theories to clarify their chaining and relevance during each step of the invasion process. This temporal sorting of invasion concepts shows that each concept is relevant at a specific stage of the invasion. Concepts and empirical findings on non-native species may appear contradictory. However, we suggest that, when mapped onto an invasion timeline, they may be combined in a complementary way. An overall scheme is proposed to summarise the theoretical dynamics of ecosystems subjected to invasions. For any given case study, this framework provides a guide through the maze of theories and should help choose the appropriate concepts according to the stage of invasion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The diet of early birds based on modern and fossil evidence and a new framework for its reconstruction Biological Invasion Theories: Merging Perspectives from Population, Community and Ecosystem Scales Consistent trade‐offs in ecosystem services between land covers with different production intensities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1