标准化降水指数(SPI)与标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)估算土壤湿度的精度比较

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY Sains Tanah Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI:10.20961/stjssa.v17i1.41396
D. Ariyanto, A. Aziz, K. Komariah, S. Sumani, M. Abara
{"title":"标准化降水指数(SPI)与标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)估算土壤湿度的精度比较","authors":"D. Ariyanto, A. Aziz, K. Komariah, S. Sumani, M. Abara","doi":"10.20961/stjssa.v17i1.41396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) are used to monitor and identify different types of drought, including meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts. This study evaluates the accuracy of estimating soil moisture levels using the two indexes. The analysis correlated the SPI and the SPEI over three years (November 2016–October 2019) using Rstudio , with average monthly soil moisture taken using a Soil Moisture Sensor; 3-, 6- and 12-months SPI and SPEI showed a positive correlation for soil moisture (Sig 0.05). In contrast, the 3-, 6-, and 12-months indexes were significant (p-value <0.05). Estimating soil moisture content using the SPEI (50–59.09%) had a higher accuracy value than the SPI (36.36%), which indicates the SPEI can more reliably predict soil moisture.","PeriodicalId":36463,"journal":{"name":"Sains Tanah","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the accuracy of estimating soil moisture using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)\",\"authors\":\"D. Ariyanto, A. Aziz, K. Komariah, S. Sumani, M. Abara\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/stjssa.v17i1.41396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) are used to monitor and identify different types of drought, including meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts. This study evaluates the accuracy of estimating soil moisture levels using the two indexes. The analysis correlated the SPI and the SPEI over three years (November 2016–October 2019) using Rstudio , with average monthly soil moisture taken using a Soil Moisture Sensor; 3-, 6- and 12-months SPI and SPEI showed a positive correlation for soil moisture (Sig 0.05). In contrast, the 3-, 6-, and 12-months indexes were significant (p-value <0.05). Estimating soil moisture content using the SPEI (50–59.09%) had a higher accuracy value than the SPI (36.36%), which indicates the SPEI can more reliably predict soil moisture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sains Tanah\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"23-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sains Tanah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/stjssa.v17i1.41396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sains Tanah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/stjssa.v17i1.41396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

标准化降水指数(SPI)和标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)用于监测和识别不同类型的干旱,包括气象、水文和农业干旱。本研究利用这两个指标评估土壤湿度水平估算的准确性。利用Rstudio对三年(2016年11月- 2019年10月)的SPI和SPEI进行了相关分析,并使用土壤湿度传感器测量了月平均土壤湿度;3、6、12个月SPI和SPEI与土壤湿度呈显著正相关(Sig 0.05)。3个月、6个月和12个月的指标差异均有统计学意义(p值<0.05)。利用SPEI估算土壤水分(50 ~ 59.09%)的精度高于SPI(36.36%),表明SPEI对土壤水分的预测更为可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the accuracy of estimating soil moisture using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)
The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) are used to monitor and identify different types of drought, including meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural droughts. This study evaluates the accuracy of estimating soil moisture levels using the two indexes. The analysis correlated the SPI and the SPEI over three years (November 2016–October 2019) using Rstudio , with average monthly soil moisture taken using a Soil Moisture Sensor; 3-, 6- and 12-months SPI and SPEI showed a positive correlation for soil moisture (Sig 0.05). In contrast, the 3-, 6-, and 12-months indexes were significant (p-value <0.05). Estimating soil moisture content using the SPEI (50–59.09%) had a higher accuracy value than the SPI (36.36%), which indicates the SPEI can more reliably predict soil moisture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sains Tanah
Sains Tanah Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Native Metallophytes on Ultramafic Wooded Grassland in Sta Cruz, Mindoro Occidental, Philippines: Insights Into Phytostabilization and Forest Restoration Effect of the pre-magnetic treatment of seeds and the N-fertilizer on the yield and quality of groundnut grown in sandy soil Physicochemical characterization and presence of heavy metals in the trout farming area of Lake Titicaca, Peru Shallot growth and yield supported by irrigation and nitrogen application in utilizing dry land area in Mesuji, Lampung Province, Indonesia Characteristics and utilization of black soils in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1