作为政府关联组织最佳实践的操作风险管理的制度化和流程要素:马来西亚案例研究

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-08
S. Zainuddin, Borhan Abdullah, Noorshella Binti Che Nawi, T. Abdullah, Noorul Azwin Md Nasir, Nur Izzati Mohamad Anuar
{"title":"作为政府关联组织最佳实践的操作风险管理的制度化和流程要素:马来西亚案例研究","authors":"S. Zainuddin, Borhan Abdullah, Noorshella Binti Che Nawi, T. Abdullah, Noorul Azwin Md Nasir, Nur Izzati Mohamad Anuar","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operational risk management practice varies from one organization to another. There is no consistency in its implementation. This has caused misinterpretation, half-hearted implementation which eventually, denies the full function of its capabilities to support a business operation. Previous studies have provided limited exposure in finding on the best practice of operational risk management implementation. To fill the gap, this study aimed to uncover and explore how operational risk management is institutionalized within an organization and the best practice from a primary GLC in Malaysia. An extended case study approach by Burawoy (1998) was adopted. The primary data from 42 semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study found seven processual stages which the case company underwent to institutionalize risk management and regarded as the best practice of operational risk management implementation that supports business operations. Namely, strong leadership and obtaining external consultancy, setting the apparatus and assignment of tasks to the person in charge, risk framework, risk diagnostics, monitor and measure, developing and nurture a risk management culture, and consistent risk management enforcement and monitoring. These are regarded as a best practice by similar organizations in its sector. Keywords: case study, institutionalization, operational-risk-management","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Institutionalization and Processual Elements of Operational Risk Management as a Best Practice in a Government-Linked Organization: A Case Study in Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"S. Zainuddin, Borhan Abdullah, Noorshella Binti Che Nawi, T. Abdullah, Noorul Azwin Md Nasir, Nur Izzati Mohamad Anuar\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operational risk management practice varies from one organization to another. There is no consistency in its implementation. This has caused misinterpretation, half-hearted implementation which eventually, denies the full function of its capabilities to support a business operation. Previous studies have provided limited exposure in finding on the best practice of operational risk management implementation. To fill the gap, this study aimed to uncover and explore how operational risk management is institutionalized within an organization and the best practice from a primary GLC in Malaysia. An extended case study approach by Burawoy (1998) was adopted. The primary data from 42 semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study found seven processual stages which the case company underwent to institutionalize risk management and regarded as the best practice of operational risk management implementation that supports business operations. Namely, strong leadership and obtaining external consultancy, setting the apparatus and assignment of tasks to the person in charge, risk framework, risk diagnostics, monitor and measure, developing and nurture a risk management culture, and consistent risk management enforcement and monitoring. These are regarded as a best practice by similar organizations in its sector. Keywords: case study, institutionalization, operational-risk-management\",\"PeriodicalId\":41923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i2-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运营风险管理实践因组织而异。其执行没有一致性。这导致了误解,三心二意的实施,最终否定了其支持业务运营的全部功能。先前的研究在寻找操作风险管理实施的最佳实践方面提供了有限的启示。为了填补这一空白,本研究旨在揭示和探索运营风险管理如何在组织内制度化,以及马来西亚主要GLC的最佳实践。Burawoy(1998)采用了一种扩展的案例研究方法。采用主题分析法对42个半结构化访谈的主要数据进行了分析。该研究发现了案例公司将风险管理制度化所经历的七个过程阶段,并将其视为支持业务运营的运营风险管理实施的最佳实践。即,强有力的领导和获得外部咨询,设置负责人的机构和任务分配,风险框架,风险诊断,监测和测量,发展和培育风险管理文化,以及一致的风险管理执行和监测。这些都被同行业的类似组织视为最佳做法。关键词:案例研究、制度化、操作风险管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Institutionalization and Processual Elements of Operational Risk Management as a Best Practice in a Government-Linked Organization: A Case Study in Malaysia
Operational risk management practice varies from one organization to another. There is no consistency in its implementation. This has caused misinterpretation, half-hearted implementation which eventually, denies the full function of its capabilities to support a business operation. Previous studies have provided limited exposure in finding on the best practice of operational risk management implementation. To fill the gap, this study aimed to uncover and explore how operational risk management is institutionalized within an organization and the best practice from a primary GLC in Malaysia. An extended case study approach by Burawoy (1998) was adopted. The primary data from 42 semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. The study found seven processual stages which the case company underwent to institutionalize risk management and regarded as the best practice of operational risk management implementation that supports business operations. Namely, strong leadership and obtaining external consultancy, setting the apparatus and assignment of tasks to the person in charge, risk framework, risk diagnostics, monitor and measure, developing and nurture a risk management culture, and consistent risk management enforcement and monitoring. These are regarded as a best practice by similar organizations in its sector. Keywords: case study, institutionalization, operational-risk-management
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Intention of Empowering Excellence on the Path to Professional Qualification in Sustainable Development and Governance Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia Islamic Work Ethics, Good Corporate Governance Practices and Fraudulent Financial Statements Council’s Online Disclosure of Accountability Practices: Isomorphism Inquiries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1