SAMFE与警察对受害者可信度的看法之间的联系

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Feminist Criminology Pub Date : 2021-04-24 DOI:10.1177/15570851211012468
Lilly Yu, Kelly A. Walsh, Janine M. Zweig
{"title":"SAMFE与警察对受害者可信度的看法之间的联系","authors":"Lilly Yu, Kelly A. Walsh, Janine M. Zweig","doi":"10.1177/15570851211012468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While research has documented the evidentiary significance of sexual assault medical forensic exams (SAMFEs) to case processing, there has been less focus on SAMFEs’ relevance to extralegal case characteristics. This study, through focus groups with police officers and prosecutors, illuminates the link between two important case processing factors: the SAMFE and perceptions of victim credibility. The majority of respondent narratives about the utility of the SAMFE point to how it strengthens or weakens perceptions of victim credibility. This link points to the SAMFE’s important role in early case processing before investigators send DNA evidence for forensic testing.","PeriodicalId":51587,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Criminology","volume":"17 1","pages":"26 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15570851211012468","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Link Between the SAMFE and Police Perceptions of Victim Credibility\",\"authors\":\"Lilly Yu, Kelly A. Walsh, Janine M. Zweig\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15570851211012468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While research has documented the evidentiary significance of sexual assault medical forensic exams (SAMFEs) to case processing, there has been less focus on SAMFEs’ relevance to extralegal case characteristics. This study, through focus groups with police officers and prosecutors, illuminates the link between two important case processing factors: the SAMFE and perceptions of victim credibility. The majority of respondent narratives about the utility of the SAMFE point to how it strengthens or weakens perceptions of victim credibility. This link points to the SAMFE’s important role in early case processing before investigators send DNA evidence for forensic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Criminology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15570851211012468\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211012468\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211012468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然研究已经证明了性侵犯医学法医检查(SAMFE)对案件处理的证据意义,但很少关注SAMFE与法外案件特征的相关性。这项研究通过与警察和检察官组成的焦点小组,阐明了两个重要的案件处理因素之间的联系:SAMFE和受害者可信度。大多数受访者关于SAMFE效用的叙述都指出了它是如何加强或削弱受害者可信度的。这种联系表明,在调查人员发送DNA证据进行法医测试之前,SAMFE在早期案件处理中发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Link Between the SAMFE and Police Perceptions of Victim Credibility
While research has documented the evidentiary significance of sexual assault medical forensic exams (SAMFEs) to case processing, there has been less focus on SAMFEs’ relevance to extralegal case characteristics. This study, through focus groups with police officers and prosecutors, illuminates the link between two important case processing factors: the SAMFE and perceptions of victim credibility. The majority of respondent narratives about the utility of the SAMFE point to how it strengthens or weakens perceptions of victim credibility. This link points to the SAMFE’s important role in early case processing before investigators send DNA evidence for forensic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Criminology
Feminist Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The main aim of Feminist Criminology is to focus on research related to women, girls and crime. The scope includes research on women working in the criminal justice profession, women as offenders and how they are dealt with in the criminal justice system, women as victims, and theories and tests of theories related to women and crime. The feminist critique of criminology incorporates a perspective that the paths to crime differ for males and females, thus research that uses sex as a control variable often fails to illuminate the factors that predict female criminality. This journal will highlight research that takes a perspective designed to demonstrate the gendered nature of crime and responses to crime.
期刊最新文献
“It’s Just, You Don’t Have a Ride:” Transportation Experiences of Rural Women on Probation “We All Have Power”: Using Photovoice to Document Challenges and Strengths of Lakota Women With Histories of Incarceration “I had Some Memories that Popped up Again From My Childhood:” Perspectives of Incarcerated Women on the Initiation and Continuation of Substance Use Judging the Severity of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: The Role of Situational Factors and Respondents’ Characteristics in Public Opinion Narrative Resilience Among Formerly Incarcerated Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1