书评:刘海伦的《领导力救赎》

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organization Pub Date : 2023-06-17 DOI:10.1177/13505084231183951
Anna Zueva
{"title":"书评:刘海伦的《领导力救赎》","authors":"Anna Zueva","doi":"10.1177/13505084231183951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"avoid going to court. In contrast, families in upper-middle class America, which are most likely the experts’ audience, are generally free from the aforementioned issues; for such a public, home cooking is perhaps a feasible, recommended option. Regardless, while getting back into the kitchen may not be one-size-fits-all solution, it may help those who are not doing it and if it is possible to do so. The book is very much a gendered take on food in American culture. The authors make it clear that even in contemporary egalitarian-motivated America, women bear the grunt of shopping, preparing, and cleaning up food; men continue to play a side, almost apathetic role in what is described as the invisible work of food provision (it may be added that follow-up studies may analyze life from the male perspective). There is a fair bit of discussion on trying to become a good mom and working towards serving the idealized meal and distress at not being able to do so. Relatedly, young children (which each of the families has) are a central issue in the accounts and the authors’ compassionate analytical gaze casts sufficient light on how the next generation of under-privileged Americans are being brought up. The solutions to America’s food worries are deeper than one imagines. The concluding section offers some answers, like improving regulation, multi-use of large school kitchens, and increasing base incomes. However, this is the part of the book that could have been developed further considering that the subtitle of the book leads readers to this direction. Nevertheless, the book does offer more than an icebreaker to start the discussion on engrained problems. Pressure Cooker is an excellent read for any social scientist who intends to study food preparation in modern homes. The book may be light on theory, but it is vivid in description. While the setting is the American lower-middle class, many of the issues are universal. Hence, even if fine details do not apply to another context, they are useful as a point of comparison. In this regard, the book is accessible to any global lay reader. In sum, Pressure Cooker needs to be lauded for its very accessible approach to pervasive complexities in America’s food dilemma.","PeriodicalId":48238,"journal":{"name":"Organization","volume":"30 1","pages":"792 - 794"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Redeeming Leadership by Helena Liu\",\"authors\":\"Anna Zueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13505084231183951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"avoid going to court. In contrast, families in upper-middle class America, which are most likely the experts’ audience, are generally free from the aforementioned issues; for such a public, home cooking is perhaps a feasible, recommended option. Regardless, while getting back into the kitchen may not be one-size-fits-all solution, it may help those who are not doing it and if it is possible to do so. The book is very much a gendered take on food in American culture. The authors make it clear that even in contemporary egalitarian-motivated America, women bear the grunt of shopping, preparing, and cleaning up food; men continue to play a side, almost apathetic role in what is described as the invisible work of food provision (it may be added that follow-up studies may analyze life from the male perspective). There is a fair bit of discussion on trying to become a good mom and working towards serving the idealized meal and distress at not being able to do so. Relatedly, young children (which each of the families has) are a central issue in the accounts and the authors’ compassionate analytical gaze casts sufficient light on how the next generation of under-privileged Americans are being brought up. The solutions to America’s food worries are deeper than one imagines. The concluding section offers some answers, like improving regulation, multi-use of large school kitchens, and increasing base incomes. However, this is the part of the book that could have been developed further considering that the subtitle of the book leads readers to this direction. Nevertheless, the book does offer more than an icebreaker to start the discussion on engrained problems. Pressure Cooker is an excellent read for any social scientist who intends to study food preparation in modern homes. The book may be light on theory, but it is vivid in description. While the setting is the American lower-middle class, many of the issues are universal. Hence, even if fine details do not apply to another context, they are useful as a point of comparison. In this regard, the book is accessible to any global lay reader. In sum, Pressure Cooker needs to be lauded for its very accessible approach to pervasive complexities in America’s food dilemma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"792 - 794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231183951\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231183951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

避免上法庭。相比之下,美国中上层阶级的家庭,最有可能是专家们的听众,通常没有上述问题;对于这样的公众,家庭烹饪可能是一个可行的,推荐的选择。不管怎样,回到厨房可能不是一个放之四海而皆准的解决方案,但它可能会帮助那些没有这样做的人,如果可能的话。这本书在很大程度上是对美国文化中食物的性别解读。作者明确指出,即使在当代崇尚平等主义的美国,女性也承担着购物、准备和清理食物的繁重工作;男性在提供食物的无形工作中继续扮演着次要的、几乎是冷漠的角色(可以补充的是,后续研究可能会从男性的角度来分析生活)。关于努力成为一个好妈妈,努力为孩子提供理想的饭菜,以及无法做到这一点的痛苦,有相当多的讨论。与此相关的是,年幼的孩子(每个家庭都有)是这些故事的核心问题,作者富有同情心的分析视角充分揭示了贫困的下一代美国人是如何被抚养长大的。解决美国食品问题的办法比人们想象的要深刻得多。结论部分提供了一些答案,如改善监管,多用途的大型学校厨房,并增加基本收入。但是,考虑到书的副标题把读者引向这个方向,这是可以进一步发展的部分。然而,这本书确实提供了更多的破冰船开始讨论根深蒂固的问题。对于任何想要研究现代家庭食物制备的社会科学家来说,《高压锅》是一本极好的读物。这本书在理论方面可能欠缺,但描写却很生动。虽然故事背景是美国中下阶层,但其中许多问题是普遍存在的。因此,即使精细的细节不适用于另一个上下文,它们作为比较点也是有用的。在这方面,这本书是任何全球外行读者都可以访问的。总而言之,《高压锅》值得称赞,因为它非常容易理解美国食品困境中普遍存在的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Redeeming Leadership by Helena Liu
avoid going to court. In contrast, families in upper-middle class America, which are most likely the experts’ audience, are generally free from the aforementioned issues; for such a public, home cooking is perhaps a feasible, recommended option. Regardless, while getting back into the kitchen may not be one-size-fits-all solution, it may help those who are not doing it and if it is possible to do so. The book is very much a gendered take on food in American culture. The authors make it clear that even in contemporary egalitarian-motivated America, women bear the grunt of shopping, preparing, and cleaning up food; men continue to play a side, almost apathetic role in what is described as the invisible work of food provision (it may be added that follow-up studies may analyze life from the male perspective). There is a fair bit of discussion on trying to become a good mom and working towards serving the idealized meal and distress at not being able to do so. Relatedly, young children (which each of the families has) are a central issue in the accounts and the authors’ compassionate analytical gaze casts sufficient light on how the next generation of under-privileged Americans are being brought up. The solutions to America’s food worries are deeper than one imagines. The concluding section offers some answers, like improving regulation, multi-use of large school kitchens, and increasing base incomes. However, this is the part of the book that could have been developed further considering that the subtitle of the book leads readers to this direction. Nevertheless, the book does offer more than an icebreaker to start the discussion on engrained problems. Pressure Cooker is an excellent read for any social scientist who intends to study food preparation in modern homes. The book may be light on theory, but it is vivid in description. While the setting is the American lower-middle class, many of the issues are universal. Hence, even if fine details do not apply to another context, they are useful as a point of comparison. In this regard, the book is accessible to any global lay reader. In sum, Pressure Cooker needs to be lauded for its very accessible approach to pervasive complexities in America’s food dilemma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization
Organization MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses the full range of key theoretical, methodological and substantive debates and developments in organizational analysis, broadly conceived, identifying and assessing their impacts on organizational practices worldwide. Alongside more micro-processual analyses, it particularly encourages attention to the links between intellectual developments, changes in organizational forms and practices, and broader social, cultural and institutional transformations.
期刊最新文献
Alter-anthropological thought in organization studies From anti-state Nazism to neo-bureaucracy? Media Review: Lupin: Eradicating the stereotype of the African immigrant Carta Aberta: (In)visibilizing transgender bodies in organizations Rethinking organization studies methods through a posthumanist epistemology of practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1