语境中的吉本斯:十七世纪英国雕塑作品的生命力

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 ART Sculpture Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.3828/SJ.2020.29.3.4
C. Davis
{"title":"语境中的吉本斯:十七世纪英国雕塑作品的生命力","authors":"C. Davis","doi":"10.3828/SJ.2020.29.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nSince the beginning of the twentieth century there has been a small but significant number of studies dedicated to Grinling Gibbons. In the mid-century Gibbons’s establishment in the broader public consciousness can be traced in the emergence of children’s books and school plays that mythologized his life and career. Yet all publications, both scholarly and juvenile, are united in their presentation of Gibbons as the only sculptor of significance to have emerged in late seventeenth-century England. I argue that this is an inaccurate portrayal of the period, and one that was not shared by his contemporaries. By contextualizing Gibbons among his predecessors, collaborators and competitors, the specific nature of Gibbons’s sculptural contribution can be more accurately placed. Such an analysis further provides a perspective from which we can understand more fully the ways in which sculpture mattered to a seventeenth-century audience.","PeriodicalId":21666,"journal":{"name":"Sculpture Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"299-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grinling Gibbons in context: the vitality of English seventeenth-century sculptural production\",\"authors\":\"C. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/SJ.2020.29.3.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nSince the beginning of the twentieth century there has been a small but significant number of studies dedicated to Grinling Gibbons. In the mid-century Gibbons’s establishment in the broader public consciousness can be traced in the emergence of children’s books and school plays that mythologized his life and career. Yet all publications, both scholarly and juvenile, are united in their presentation of Gibbons as the only sculptor of significance to have emerged in late seventeenth-century England. I argue that this is an inaccurate portrayal of the period, and one that was not shared by his contemporaries. By contextualizing Gibbons among his predecessors, collaborators and competitors, the specific nature of Gibbons’s sculptural contribution can be more accurately placed. Such an analysis further provides a perspective from which we can understand more fully the ways in which sculpture mattered to a seventeenth-century audience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sculpture Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"299-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sculpture Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/SJ.2020.29.3.4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sculpture Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/SJ.2020.29.3.4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自二十世纪初以来,有少量但数量可观的研究致力于研磨长臂猿。世纪中期,吉本斯在更广泛的公众意识中的地位可以追溯到儿童书籍和学校戏剧的出现,这些书籍和戏剧将他的生活和职业神话化。然而,所有的出版物,无论是学术出版物还是青少年出版物,都将吉本斯描述为17世纪末英国出现的唯一一位重要雕塑家。我认为这是对那个时期的不准确描述,他的同时代人并不认同。通过将吉本斯与他的前任、合作者和竞争对手联系起来,可以更准确地定位吉本斯雕塑贡献的具体性质。这样的分析进一步提供了一个视角,从这个视角我们可以更全面地理解雕塑对17世纪观众的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grinling Gibbons in context: the vitality of English seventeenth-century sculptural production
Since the beginning of the twentieth century there has been a small but significant number of studies dedicated to Grinling Gibbons. In the mid-century Gibbons’s establishment in the broader public consciousness can be traced in the emergence of children’s books and school plays that mythologized his life and career. Yet all publications, both scholarly and juvenile, are united in their presentation of Gibbons as the only sculptor of significance to have emerged in late seventeenth-century England. I argue that this is an inaccurate portrayal of the period, and one that was not shared by his contemporaries. By contextualizing Gibbons among his predecessors, collaborators and competitors, the specific nature of Gibbons’s sculptural contribution can be more accurately placed. Such an analysis further provides a perspective from which we can understand more fully the ways in which sculpture mattered to a seventeenth-century audience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Review Valuing sculpture in the long eighteenth century: materials and technology The Young Naturalist by Henry Weekes: intermediality, industry and international exhibitions Fabricating enchantment: Antoine Benoist’s wax courtiers in Louis XIV’s Paris Valuing ornament: Jean-Baptiste Plantar (1790–1879) between art, craft and industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1