寄养校友出院后感知支持的经历:LGBTQ+青年和有色人种青年之间的差异

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Public Child Welfare Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202
Catherine A. LaBrenz, Miao Yu, Micki Washburn, Ashley N. Palmer, Lacey Jenkins, Devan Kennedy
{"title":"寄养校友出院后感知支持的经历:LGBTQ+青年和有色人种青年之间的差异","authors":"Catherine A. LaBrenz, Miao Yu, Micki Washburn, Ashley N. Palmer, Lacey Jenkins, Devan Kennedy","doi":"10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social support is a key protective factor among transition age youth. Yet, for youth with lived experience in foster care, social support systems are frequently disrupted. This may disproportionality impact LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color, given their overrepresentation in foster care. Using data from the Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative, we examined family and non-family support among foster care alumni (n = 1,377). Youth who identified as LGBTQ+ or were Black were less likely to report family and non-family support than their non-LGBTQ+ or White peers. Implications for child welfare and future research are explored.","PeriodicalId":16907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Child Welfare","volume":"17 1","pages":"569 - 594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of perceived support post discharge among foster care alumni: differences among LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color\",\"authors\":\"Catherine A. LaBrenz, Miao Yu, Micki Washburn, Ashley N. Palmer, Lacey Jenkins, Devan Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Social support is a key protective factor among transition age youth. Yet, for youth with lived experience in foster care, social support systems are frequently disrupted. This may disproportionality impact LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color, given their overrepresentation in foster care. Using data from the Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative, we examined family and non-family support among foster care alumni (n = 1,377). Youth who identified as LGBTQ+ or were Black were less likely to report family and non-family support than their non-LGBTQ+ or White peers. Implications for child welfare and future research are explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Child Welfare\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"569 - 594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Child Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2022.2069202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

社会支持是过渡年龄青年的关键保护因素。然而,对于有寄养生活经历的青年来说,社会支持系统往往会中断。这可能会对LGBTQ+青年和有色人种青年造成不成比例的影响,因为他们在寄养机构中的比例过高。使用来自吉姆·凯西青年机会倡议的数据,我们检查了寄养校友的家庭和非家庭支持(n = 1377)。与非LGBTQ+或白人同龄人相比,被认为是LGBTQ+或黑人的年轻人报告家庭和非家庭支持的可能性更小。对儿童福利和未来研究的影响进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of perceived support post discharge among foster care alumni: differences among LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color
ABSTRACT Social support is a key protective factor among transition age youth. Yet, for youth with lived experience in foster care, social support systems are frequently disrupted. This may disproportionality impact LGBTQ+ youth and youth of color, given their overrepresentation in foster care. Using data from the Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative, we examined family and non-family support among foster care alumni (n = 1,377). Youth who identified as LGBTQ+ or were Black were less likely to report family and non-family support than their non-LGBTQ+ or White peers. Implications for child welfare and future research are explored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Decisions made in the practice of child welfare have lifelong effects on children and their entire families which in turn affects every facet of society. To effectively practice in this vital field, social workers, psychologists, counselors, juvenile court judges, attorneys, and other child welfare professionals need to stay informed about the latest findings and important issues in public child welfare. To answer this crucial need, the Journal of Public Child Welfare provides a broad forum for theory-based and applied research in child welfare. Rather than limit itself to primarily private agencies, this essential journal provides the quality research and comprehensive information that child welfare professionals and public agencies need most.
期刊最新文献
According to their own accounts: former child welfare involved youth recalling their participation in child protective services interviews that occurred at school CaseAIM: child welfare workers’ experiences using information and communication technology for case management services How to protect those who protect: psychosocial risks in child welfare workers during the pandemic The Cuyahoga youth count: one county’s prevalence of and experience data from LGBTQ+ youth in out-of-home placements Examining the impact of participation in a foster parent support program on child welfare outcomes in Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1