互联网监管作为媒介政策:对数字传播平台治理问题的再思考

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Digital Media & Policy Pub Date : 2019-02-19 DOI:10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1
T. Flew, Fiona Martin, Nicolas Suzor
{"title":"互联网监管作为媒介政策:对数字传播平台治理问题的再思考","authors":"T. Flew, Fiona Martin, Nicolas Suzor","doi":"10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies the current global ‘techlash’ towards the major digital and social media platforms as providing the context for a renewed debate about whether these digital platform companies are effectively media companies (publishers and broadcasters of media content), and implications this has for twenty-first-century media policy. It identifies content moderation as a critical site around which such debates are being played out, and considers the challenges arising as national and regionally based regulatory options are considered for digital platforms that are ‘born global’. It considers the shifting balance between the ‘social contract’ of public interest obligations and democratic rights of free speech and freedom of expression.","PeriodicalId":40702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance\",\"authors\":\"T. Flew, Fiona Martin, Nicolas Suzor\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies the current global ‘techlash’ towards the major digital and social media platforms as providing the context for a renewed debate about whether these digital platform companies are effectively media companies (publishers and broadcasters of media content), and implications this has for twenty-first-century media policy. It identifies content moderation as a critical site around which such debates are being played out, and considers the challenges arising as national and regionally based regulatory options are considered for digital platforms that are ‘born global’. It considers the shifting balance between the ‘social contract’ of public interest obligations and democratic rights of free speech and freedom of expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Media & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Media & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Media & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JDMP.10.1.33_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

摘要

本文指出,当前全球对主要数字和社交媒体平台的“技术冲击”,为这些数字平台公司是否有效地成为媒体公司(媒体内容的出版商和广播公司)以及这对21世纪媒体政策的影响提供了新的辩论背景。它将内容审核确定为一个关键的网站,围绕着这个网站展开了这样的辩论,并考虑了为“天生全球化”的数字平台考虑基于国家和地区的监管选择所带来的挑战。它考虑了公共利益义务的“社会契约”与言论自由和言论自由的民主权利之间不断变化的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Internet regulation as media policy: Rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance
This article identifies the current global ‘techlash’ towards the major digital and social media platforms as providing the context for a renewed debate about whether these digital platform companies are effectively media companies (publishers and broadcasters of media content), and implications this has for twenty-first-century media policy. It identifies content moderation as a critical site around which such debates are being played out, and considers the challenges arising as national and regionally based regulatory options are considered for digital platforms that are ‘born global’. It considers the shifting balance between the ‘social contract’ of public interest obligations and democratic rights of free speech and freedom of expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The concept of ‘new media’ among Jordanian news producers Digital disruption and global businesses’ viability under COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic Platform governance and the politics of media regulation: The review of the European Audiovisual Media Services Directive Intermediary roles in the transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive into domestic legislation: Evidence from Spain European audiovisual media policy in the age of global video on demand services: A case study of Netflix in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1