新冠肺炎疫情期间医生对延误和终止临终病人生命支持行为的责任

SASI Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1167
A. Kusumaningrum
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情期间医生对延误和终止临终病人生命支持行为的责任","authors":"A. Kusumaningrum","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical action is a doctor's action toward a patient which includes preventive, diagnostic, curative, or rehabilitative measures. The medical action certainly brings legal consequences, so a doctor is legally responsible for the medical actions he takes, including the act of delaying and terminating life support.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the responsibility of doctors for the act of delaying and terminating life support for terminal patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the obstacles and solutions.Methods of the Research: This research approach is normative juridical with secondary data as the main data obtained through literature study and will be analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: This study found that doctors who are negligent and guilty when performing acts of delaying and discontinuing life support can be prosecuted for criminal, civil, administrative and professional ethical responsibility. The enactment of a ministerial-level regulation that regulates this action provides legal protection for doctors, where there is a change in the way of making decisions on medical actions so that the doctor's legal responsibility turns into a collective or corporate responsibility. However, the implementation of the regulation still has various shortcomings, so legal protection for doctors is not optimal.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doctor's Responsibility For Actions of Delaying And Termination of Life Support of Terminal Patients During The Covid-19 Pandemi\",\"authors\":\"A. Kusumaningrum\",\"doi\":\"10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Medical action is a doctor's action toward a patient which includes preventive, diagnostic, curative, or rehabilitative measures. The medical action certainly brings legal consequences, so a doctor is legally responsible for the medical actions he takes, including the act of delaying and terminating life support.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the responsibility of doctors for the act of delaying and terminating life support for terminal patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the obstacles and solutions.Methods of the Research: This research approach is normative juridical with secondary data as the main data obtained through literature study and will be analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: This study found that doctors who are negligent and guilty when performing acts of delaying and discontinuing life support can be prosecuted for criminal, civil, administrative and professional ethical responsibility. The enactment of a ministerial-level regulation that regulates this action provides legal protection for doctors, where there is a change in the way of making decisions on medical actions so that the doctor's legal responsibility turns into a collective or corporate responsibility. However, the implementation of the regulation still has various shortcomings, so legal protection for doctors is not optimal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SASI\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SASI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学行动是医生对病人采取的行动,包括预防、诊断、治疗或康复措施。医疗行为必然会带来法律后果,因此医生对他所采取的医疗行为负有法律责任,包括延迟和终止生命维持的行为。研究目的:本研究旨在考察和分析在新冠肺炎大流行期间,医生对晚期患者延迟和终止生命支持行为的责任,以及障碍和解决办法。研究方法:本研究方法为规范法,以二手资料为主要资料,通过文献研究获得,并进行定性分析。研究结果:本研究发现,在实施延迟和停止生命维持的行为时,疏忽和有罪的医生可能会被追究刑事、民事、行政和职业道德责任。制定了一项部级条例来规范这一行动,为医生提供了法律保护,在这种情况下,对医疗行动作出决定的方式发生了变化,医生的法律责任变成了集体或集体责任。然而,该条例的实施仍存在种种不足,因此对医生的法律保护并不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doctor's Responsibility For Actions of Delaying And Termination of Life Support of Terminal Patients During The Covid-19 Pandemi
Introduction: Medical action is a doctor's action toward a patient which includes preventive, diagnostic, curative, or rehabilitative measures. The medical action certainly brings legal consequences, so a doctor is legally responsible for the medical actions he takes, including the act of delaying and terminating life support.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine and analyze the responsibility of doctors for the act of delaying and terminating life support for terminal patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the obstacles and solutions.Methods of the Research: This research approach is normative juridical with secondary data as the main data obtained through literature study and will be analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: This study found that doctors who are negligent and guilty when performing acts of delaying and discontinuing life support can be prosecuted for criminal, civil, administrative and professional ethical responsibility. The enactment of a ministerial-level regulation that regulates this action provides legal protection for doctors, where there is a change in the way of making decisions on medical actions so that the doctor's legal responsibility turns into a collective or corporate responsibility. However, the implementation of the regulation still has various shortcomings, so legal protection for doctors is not optimal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Legal Consequences of Transferring Trade Secrets on Under Hand’s Scheme Ius Constituendum Formulating Basic Values of Indigenous Peoples in Constitutional Amendments The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users Arrangements Concerning Reclamation and Their Legal Impacts in View from UNCLOS 1982 The Sharia Funding Risk Issues in Fintech Securities Crowdfunding: Realization of Legal Certainty in the Shari'ah Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1