合作学习策略对不同工程课程学生成绩的影响

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI:10.14710/IJEE.1.2.114-121
Geraldine G. Nerona
{"title":"合作学习策略对不同工程课程学生成绩的影响","authors":"Geraldine G. Nerona","doi":"10.14710/IJEE.1.2.114-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on determining the effectiveness of collaborative learning strategies in improving students' performance in three general engineering courses. The pretest-posttest control group experimental design was used in the study. From the results of the Z-test, there were no significant differences in the pretest scores of the experimental and control groups. However there were significant differences in the posttest scores of the respondents, with the experimental groups engagedin collaborative learning obtaining significantly higher achievement scores than their control group counterparts,who were exposed to the traditional lecture-discussion and individual learning methods. Effect sizes were also positive for the experimental groups, meaning, they were able to perform better in class compared to their control group counterparts.","PeriodicalId":54960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"114-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Collaborative Learning Strategies on Student Achievement in Various Engineering Courses\",\"authors\":\"Geraldine G. Nerona\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/IJEE.1.2.114-121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focused on determining the effectiveness of collaborative learning strategies in improving students' performance in three general engineering courses. The pretest-posttest control group experimental design was used in the study. From the results of the Z-test, there were no significant differences in the pretest scores of the experimental and control groups. However there were significant differences in the posttest scores of the respondents, with the experimental groups engagedin collaborative learning obtaining significantly higher achievement scores than their control group counterparts,who were exposed to the traditional lecture-discussion and individual learning methods. Effect sizes were also positive for the experimental groups, meaning, they were able to perform better in class compared to their control group counterparts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"114-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/IJEE.1.2.114-121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/IJEE.1.2.114-121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨合作学习策略对提高学生在三门普通工程课程学习成绩的效果。本研究采用前测后测对照组实验设计。从z检验的结果来看,实验组和对照组的前测分数没有显著差异。然而,被调查者的后测成绩却存在显著差异,参与合作学习的实验组的成绩明显高于接受传统讲座讨论和个体学习方法的对照组。实验组的效应值也为正,这意味着,与对照组相比,他们在课堂上的表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Collaborative Learning Strategies on Student Achievement in Various Engineering Courses
This study focused on determining the effectiveness of collaborative learning strategies in improving students' performance in three general engineering courses. The pretest-posttest control group experimental design was used in the study. From the results of the Z-test, there were no significant differences in the pretest scores of the experimental and control groups. However there were significant differences in the posttest scores of the respondents, with the experimental groups engagedin collaborative learning obtaining significantly higher achievement scores than their control group counterparts,who were exposed to the traditional lecture-discussion and individual learning methods. Effect sizes were also positive for the experimental groups, meaning, they were able to perform better in class compared to their control group counterparts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Engineering Education
International Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE) is an independent, peer-reviewed journal. It has been serving as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering education for over thirty years. The Journal publishes six issues per year. These include, from time to time, special issues on specific engineering education topics. Only manuscripts that have a focus on engineering education will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Developing systems thinking in a Project-Based Learning environment Role of FCBF Feature Selection Algorithm in Educational Data Mining Development of a Game-Based e-Learning System with Augmented Reality for Improving Students’ Learning Performance THE ANALYSIS IS FOR THE DESIGN OF DIFFERENT CLUB FACE’S THICKNESSES OF FAIRWAY WOOD TO THE CHARACTERISTIC TIME Predictive analysis of instruction in science to students’ declining in-terest in science-An analysis of gifted students of sixth - and seventh-grade in Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1