权力与地位:现代洛林早期的公爵与贵族

Q3 Arts and Humanities Court Historian Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328
Elisabetta G. Lurgo
{"title":"权力与地位:现代洛林早期的公爵与贵族","authors":"Elisabetta G. Lurgo","doi":"10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T his book by Anne Motta aims to analyse the relationships between prince and nobility in Lorraine, from the reign of Duke Charles IV (–) to the reign of Francis III (–) who was not able nor willing to prevent the former king of Poland, Stanislaus Leszczynski, replacing him in Lorraine before its definitive annexation to France. According to Motta, the evolution of relations between the prince and the nobility of Lorraine occurred in the wider context of both a reinforcement of princely authority in European states and a phase of transition for the history of Lorraine. The key question for the nobility was, indeed, how to find a balance between their traditional loyalty to the prince and their desire for independence which animated the nobility particularly confronted with a sovereign exiled from his own territory. As the author points out, like the nobility in other European states, the nobility of Lorraine did not constitute an homogeneous order. However, due to the administrative configuration of the state, it presented characteristic features. Lorraine was a parcelled territory, enclosed by France, the Empire and Franche Comté, composed of three principal entities: the three archbishoprics of Metz, Toul and Verdun which were subject to the king of France from , the duchy of Lorraine and the duchy of Bar. These two duchies, legally and politically connected since the end of the fifteenth century, are the main topic of this study: one primary objective is to question the traditional image of a Lorraine nobility constant in its loyalty to the prince and in its resistance to French occupations. The idea of a general consensus among the Lorraine nobility has already been questioned by some historians, such as Yves Le Moigne and, more recently, Philippe Martin. As Anne Motta notes, we still lack an overall study of the political dimension of the Lorraine nobility as a social grouping in order to understand the real place of local nobility in princely circles and to evaluate the effective impact of its practices of power. The central topic of Motta’s study being the nobility as a political force, her analysis only takes into account the most representative families, close to the prince and directly involved in government. She therefore does not address minor rural nobility or nobles settled abroad, in foreign courts. The linkages between local nobility and the prince grew in strength at the beginning of the seventeenth century, when the so-called second order was incarnated by ancient feudality. In a second phase, from  to , the nobility experienced the exile of the prince and the French occupation of the duchy; the return of stability opened a new phase, from  to , in which the prince attempted to restore his power with the initial support of a destabilized nobility. If Duke Leopold I (–) chose to conciliate the","PeriodicalId":37034,"journal":{"name":"Court Historian","volume":"24 1","pages":"286 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power and Place: The Duke and the Nobility in Early Modern Lorraine\",\"authors\":\"Elisabetta G. Lurgo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T his book by Anne Motta aims to analyse the relationships between prince and nobility in Lorraine, from the reign of Duke Charles IV (–) to the reign of Francis III (–) who was not able nor willing to prevent the former king of Poland, Stanislaus Leszczynski, replacing him in Lorraine before its definitive annexation to France. According to Motta, the evolution of relations between the prince and the nobility of Lorraine occurred in the wider context of both a reinforcement of princely authority in European states and a phase of transition for the history of Lorraine. The key question for the nobility was, indeed, how to find a balance between their traditional loyalty to the prince and their desire for independence which animated the nobility particularly confronted with a sovereign exiled from his own territory. As the author points out, like the nobility in other European states, the nobility of Lorraine did not constitute an homogeneous order. However, due to the administrative configuration of the state, it presented characteristic features. Lorraine was a parcelled territory, enclosed by France, the Empire and Franche Comté, composed of three principal entities: the three archbishoprics of Metz, Toul and Verdun which were subject to the king of France from , the duchy of Lorraine and the duchy of Bar. These two duchies, legally and politically connected since the end of the fifteenth century, are the main topic of this study: one primary objective is to question the traditional image of a Lorraine nobility constant in its loyalty to the prince and in its resistance to French occupations. The idea of a general consensus among the Lorraine nobility has already been questioned by some historians, such as Yves Le Moigne and, more recently, Philippe Martin. As Anne Motta notes, we still lack an overall study of the political dimension of the Lorraine nobility as a social grouping in order to understand the real place of local nobility in princely circles and to evaluate the effective impact of its practices of power. The central topic of Motta’s study being the nobility as a political force, her analysis only takes into account the most representative families, close to the prince and directly involved in government. She therefore does not address minor rural nobility or nobles settled abroad, in foreign courts. The linkages between local nobility and the prince grew in strength at the beginning of the seventeenth century, when the so-called second order was incarnated by ancient feudality. In a second phase, from  to , the nobility experienced the exile of the prince and the French occupation of the duchy; the return of stability opened a new phase, from  to , in which the prince attempted to restore his power with the initial support of a destabilized nobility. If Duke Leopold I (–) chose to conciliate the\",\"PeriodicalId\":37034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court Historian\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"286 - 290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court Historian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14629712.2019.1675328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安妮·莫塔的这本书旨在分析查尔斯四世统治时期洛林的王子和贵族之间的关系(–) 弗朗西斯三世统治时期(–) 他既不能也不愿阻止波兰前国王斯坦尼斯劳斯·莱斯钦斯基在洛林接替他,直到洛林最终被法国吞并。根据莫塔的说法,洛林王子和贵族之间关系的演变发生在欧洲国家加强王子权威和洛林历史过渡阶段的更广泛背景下。事实上,贵族们面临的关键问题是,如何在他们对王子的传统忠诚和他们对独立的渴望之间找到平衡,这激发了贵族们的活力,尤其是在面对从自己领土上流亡的君主时。正如作者所指出的,与欧洲其他国家的贵族一样,洛林的贵族并不构成一个同质的秩序。然而,由于国家的行政配置,它呈现出一些特色。洛林是一块由法国、帝国和法兰西共和国包围的分割领土,由三个主要实体组成:梅斯、图尔和凡尔登三个大主教区,自, 洛林公爵领地和巴尔公爵领地。这两个自15世纪末以来在法律和政治上都有联系的公爵领地是本研究的主要主题:一个主要目标是质疑洛林贵族对王子的忠诚和对法国占领的抵抗的传统形象。洛林贵族达成普遍共识的想法已经受到一些历史学家的质疑,比如伊夫·勒莫伊涅和最近的菲利普·马丁。正如安妮·莫塔所指出的,我们仍然缺乏对洛林贵族作为一个社会群体的政治层面的全面研究,以了解当地贵族在贵族圈子中的真实地位,并评估其权力实践的有效影响。莫塔研究的中心主题是贵族作为一种政治力量,她的分析只考虑了与王子关系密切、直接参与政府的最具代表性的家庭。因此,在外国法庭上,她不涉及农村的小贵族或定居国外的贵族。17世纪初,当地贵族和王子之间的联系越来越紧密,当时所谓的第二秩序体现在古代的封建制度中。在第二阶段,从 到, 贵族经历了王子的流亡和法国对公爵领地的占领;稳定的回归开启了一个新的阶段 到, 在这部电影中,王子试图在一个不稳定的贵族的最初支持下恢复他的权力。如果利奥波德公爵一世(–) 选择调解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power and Place: The Duke and the Nobility in Early Modern Lorraine
T his book by Anne Motta aims to analyse the relationships between prince and nobility in Lorraine, from the reign of Duke Charles IV (–) to the reign of Francis III (–) who was not able nor willing to prevent the former king of Poland, Stanislaus Leszczynski, replacing him in Lorraine before its definitive annexation to France. According to Motta, the evolution of relations between the prince and the nobility of Lorraine occurred in the wider context of both a reinforcement of princely authority in European states and a phase of transition for the history of Lorraine. The key question for the nobility was, indeed, how to find a balance between their traditional loyalty to the prince and their desire for independence which animated the nobility particularly confronted with a sovereign exiled from his own territory. As the author points out, like the nobility in other European states, the nobility of Lorraine did not constitute an homogeneous order. However, due to the administrative configuration of the state, it presented characteristic features. Lorraine was a parcelled territory, enclosed by France, the Empire and Franche Comté, composed of three principal entities: the three archbishoprics of Metz, Toul and Verdun which were subject to the king of France from , the duchy of Lorraine and the duchy of Bar. These two duchies, legally and politically connected since the end of the fifteenth century, are the main topic of this study: one primary objective is to question the traditional image of a Lorraine nobility constant in its loyalty to the prince and in its resistance to French occupations. The idea of a general consensus among the Lorraine nobility has already been questioned by some historians, such as Yves Le Moigne and, more recently, Philippe Martin. As Anne Motta notes, we still lack an overall study of the political dimension of the Lorraine nobility as a social grouping in order to understand the real place of local nobility in princely circles and to evaluate the effective impact of its practices of power. The central topic of Motta’s study being the nobility as a political force, her analysis only takes into account the most representative families, close to the prince and directly involved in government. She therefore does not address minor rural nobility or nobles settled abroad, in foreign courts. The linkages between local nobility and the prince grew in strength at the beginning of the seventeenth century, when the so-called second order was incarnated by ancient feudality. In a second phase, from  to , the nobility experienced the exile of the prince and the French occupation of the duchy; the return of stability opened a new phase, from  to , in which the prince attempted to restore his power with the initial support of a destabilized nobility. If Duke Leopold I (–) chose to conciliate the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Court Historian
Court Historian Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
‘Una stalla bella e un Maestro eccellente’ In the Circle of Power: Friends of King Vladislav IV Vasa Early Modern Privacy at the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Courts Ambassadors in Golden-Age Madrid Private Celebrations at the Polish Court in the Time of Louise Marie de Gonzague-Nevers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1