走向AI成分

AI matters Pub Date : 2021-01-04 DOI:10.1145/3402562.3402567
C. Hughes, Tracey Hughes
{"title":"走向AI成分","authors":"C. Hughes, Tracey Hughes","doi":"10.1145/3402562.3402567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have AI in our cars, in our mobile phones, and AI in our video games. We have AI in medicine, AI in the military applications, and AI in government agencies. It's getting harder to find an aspect of our daily lives that doesn't purport to have some kind of interaction with AI. We are relinquishing more of the personal and professional decision-making process to vestiges of evolving notions of AI. Not only are we starting to defer to AI for the decisionmaking process, we are subtly transferring the ultimate responsibility for the decisions and the consequences of those decisions to the AI. The public's acceptance and reliance on various aspects of AI is becoming normalized. One major problem with this scenario is that we as a society are unclear about what constitutes AI. Our social position on AI is: we may not be able to concisely or correctly define it, but we all know it when we see it, right? Clearly the integral part that AI has in our society makes this position untenable and we can and should do better with our definition.","PeriodicalId":91445,"journal":{"name":"AI matters","volume":"6 1","pages":"13 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3402562.3402567","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards AI ingredients\",\"authors\":\"C. Hughes, Tracey Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3402562.3402567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have AI in our cars, in our mobile phones, and AI in our video games. We have AI in medicine, AI in the military applications, and AI in government agencies. It's getting harder to find an aspect of our daily lives that doesn't purport to have some kind of interaction with AI. We are relinquishing more of the personal and professional decision-making process to vestiges of evolving notions of AI. Not only are we starting to defer to AI for the decisionmaking process, we are subtly transferring the ultimate responsibility for the decisions and the consequences of those decisions to the AI. The public's acceptance and reliance on various aspects of AI is becoming normalized. One major problem with this scenario is that we as a society are unclear about what constitutes AI. Our social position on AI is: we may not be able to concisely or correctly define it, but we all know it when we see it, right? Clearly the integral part that AI has in our society makes this position untenable and we can and should do better with our definition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI matters\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3402562.3402567\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3402562.3402567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3402562.3402567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的汽车、手机和电子游戏中都有人工智能。我们在医学上有人工智能,在军事应用中有人工智能。在我们的日常生活中,越来越难找到一个不声称与人工智能有某种互动的方面。我们正在放弃更多的个人和职业决策过程,让人工智能的概念不断演变。我们不仅开始在决策过程中听从人工智能,我们正在巧妙地将决策和决策后果的最终责任转移给人工智能。公众对人工智能各个方面的接受和依赖正在常态化。这种情况的一个主要问题是,作为一个社会,我们不清楚人工智能的构成。我们对人工智能的社会立场是:我们可能无法简洁或正确地定义它,但当我们看到它时,我们都知道它,对吧?显然,人工智能在我们社会中不可或缺的一部分使这一立场站不住脚,我们可以也应该在定义上做得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards AI ingredients
We have AI in our cars, in our mobile phones, and AI in our video games. We have AI in medicine, AI in the military applications, and AI in government agencies. It's getting harder to find an aspect of our daily lives that doesn't purport to have some kind of interaction with AI. We are relinquishing more of the personal and professional decision-making process to vestiges of evolving notions of AI. Not only are we starting to defer to AI for the decisionmaking process, we are subtly transferring the ultimate responsibility for the decisions and the consequences of those decisions to the AI. The public's acceptance and reliance on various aspects of AI is becoming normalized. One major problem with this scenario is that we as a society are unclear about what constitutes AI. Our social position on AI is: we may not be able to concisely or correctly define it, but we all know it when we see it, right? Clearly the integral part that AI has in our society makes this position untenable and we can and should do better with our definition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conference Reports Welcome to AI Matters 9(3) AI Policy Matters SIGAI Annual Report: July 1 2022 --- August 30 2023 Conference Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1