专业人士在帮助有学习障碍的父母方面有什么经验?一个meta-ethnography

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Tizard Learning Disability Review Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012
Agnieszka Pytlowana, B. Kroese
{"title":"专业人士在帮助有学习障碍的父母方面有什么经验?一个meta-ethnography","authors":"Agnieszka Pytlowana, B. Kroese","doi":"10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIt has been recommended that social, health and other relevant professionals work collaboratively to support parents with learning disabilities (LD) and their children. A number of qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of professionals who work with parents with LD. A synthesis of these experiences has not as yet been produced, and therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review how professionals experience working with parents with LD to inform practice guidelines on how parents with LD can be supported most effectively.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic search took place using five databases and 15 peer-reviewed papers were identified based on the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included paper was systematically evaluated. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the qualitative data from the identified studies.\n\n\nFindings\nThe synthesis offered six themes: concerns about knowledge and experience, the importance of and difficulties with available support, the importance of and challenges with liaison with and between professionals, differences in power, conflicting priorities – parents or children?, the personal impact on professionals.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results are discussed in the context of previous research. Recommendations for future research and practice innovation are made.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Pytlowana, B. Kroese\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIt has been recommended that social, health and other relevant professionals work collaboratively to support parents with learning disabilities (LD) and their children. A number of qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of professionals who work with parents with LD. A synthesis of these experiences has not as yet been produced, and therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review how professionals experience working with parents with LD to inform practice guidelines on how parents with LD can be supported most effectively.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA systematic search took place using five databases and 15 peer-reviewed papers were identified based on the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included paper was systematically evaluated. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the qualitative data from the identified studies.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe synthesis offered six themes: concerns about knowledge and experience, the importance of and difficulties with available support, the importance of and challenges with liaison with and between professionals, differences in power, conflicting priorities – parents or children?, the personal impact on professionals.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe results are discussed in the context of previous research. Recommendations for future research and practice innovation are made.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":54179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-06-2020-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的建议社会、卫生和其他相关专业人员合作,支持有学习障碍(LD)的父母及其子女。许多定性研究调查了与患有LD的父母一起工作的专业人员的经历。这些经验的综合还没有形成,因此,本文的目的是回顾专业人员如何与患有LD的父母合作,为如何最有效地支持患有LD的家长提供实践指南。设计/方法/方法使用五个数据库进行了系统搜索,并根据相关的纳入和排除标准确定了15篇同行评审论文。对每一篇论文的质量进行了系统评估。元民族志用于综合已确定研究的定性数据。发现该综合报告提供了六个主题:对知识和经验的关注,现有支持的重要性和困难,与专业人员联系的重要性和挑战,权力差异,相互冲突的优先事项——父母还是孩子?,对专业人士的个人影响。原创性/价值这些结果是在先前研究的背景下讨论的。对未来的研究和实践创新提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the experiences of professionals working with parents with learning disabilities? A meta-ethnography
Purpose It has been recommended that social, health and other relevant professionals work collaboratively to support parents with learning disabilities (LD) and their children. A number of qualitative studies have investigated the experiences of professionals who work with parents with LD. A synthesis of these experiences has not as yet been produced, and therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review how professionals experience working with parents with LD to inform practice guidelines on how parents with LD can be supported most effectively. Design/methodology/approach A systematic search took place using five databases and 15 peer-reviewed papers were identified based on the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each included paper was systematically evaluated. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the qualitative data from the identified studies. Findings The synthesis offered six themes: concerns about knowledge and experience, the importance of and difficulties with available support, the importance of and challenges with liaison with and between professionals, differences in power, conflicting priorities – parents or children?, the personal impact on professionals. Originality/value The results are discussed in the context of previous research. Recommendations for future research and practice innovation are made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The effects of changing the classroom play environment on the peer interactions of autistic children with an intellectual disability Using the children’s accelerated trauma technique with adults with intellectual disabilities Commentary on “The effects of changing the classroom play environment on the peer interactions of autistic children with an intellectual disability” Frontline managers’ experiences of practice leadership for when supporting autistic adults with complex support needs residing in community housing Commentary on “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1