从数学教育的角度看全国适龄识字公约

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS Mathematics Enthusiast Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.54870/1551-3440.1553
Carlos Roberto Vianna, E. Godoy, Emerson Rolkouski
{"title":"从数学教育的角度看全国适龄识字公约","authors":"Carlos Roberto Vianna, E. Godoy, Emerson Rolkouski","doi":"10.54870/1551-3440.1553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to present a public policy of large-scale literacy teachers continued training, the Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetizaçao na Idade Certa (PNAIC), making a summary of the Brazilian dissertations and theses results wich approached this public policy in the context of Mathematical Education. Initiated in 2012, the PNAIC involved more than three hundred thousand literacy teachers, from more than five thousand cities for five years. This article uses a qualitative research approach, in the descriptive modality, showing a status of the art of these researches. The set of works analyzed was divided into three groups, according to their declared research objectives: Objective 1: To analyzeinvestigate the meanings brought by the literacy teachers about the PNAIC (75.5%);Objective 2: To analyze-investigate the meanings brought by the other participants about the PNAIC (7.5%);and Objective 3: Unveil the PNAIC (17%). The analysis of the researches results associated with these objectives allowed us to reach four conclusions: 1) The trainings promoted by PNAIC supported changes in the pedagogical practices of the literacy teachers;2) the trainings promoted by PNAIC were necessary, but they wer not enough to combat illiteracy;3) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC induced the literacy teachers to reflections about the pedagogical practices and 4) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC showed weaknesses. In summary, this article presents an initial analysis of the scope from the manifested studies in dissertations and theses and supports the realization of new studies in order to deepen the analysis and evaluation of the varied aspects of one of the broadest training programs ever implemented in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":44703,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics Enthusiast","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Look at the National Pact for Literacy at the Right Age in the Mathematics Education Context\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Roberto Vianna, E. Godoy, Emerson Rolkouski\",\"doi\":\"10.54870/1551-3440.1553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to present a public policy of large-scale literacy teachers continued training, the Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetizaçao na Idade Certa (PNAIC), making a summary of the Brazilian dissertations and theses results wich approached this public policy in the context of Mathematical Education. Initiated in 2012, the PNAIC involved more than three hundred thousand literacy teachers, from more than five thousand cities for five years. This article uses a qualitative research approach, in the descriptive modality, showing a status of the art of these researches. The set of works analyzed was divided into three groups, according to their declared research objectives: Objective 1: To analyzeinvestigate the meanings brought by the literacy teachers about the PNAIC (75.5%);Objective 2: To analyze-investigate the meanings brought by the other participants about the PNAIC (7.5%);and Objective 3: Unveil the PNAIC (17%). The analysis of the researches results associated with these objectives allowed us to reach four conclusions: 1) The trainings promoted by PNAIC supported changes in the pedagogical practices of the literacy teachers;2) the trainings promoted by PNAIC were necessary, but they wer not enough to combat illiteracy;3) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC induced the literacy teachers to reflections about the pedagogical practices and 4) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC showed weaknesses. In summary, this article presents an initial analysis of the scope from the manifested studies in dissertations and theses and supports the realization of new studies in order to deepen the analysis and evaluation of the varied aspects of one of the broadest training programs ever implemented in Brazil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematics Enthusiast\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematics Enthusiast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics Enthusiast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在介绍一项大规模扫盲教师继续培训的公共政策,即国家扫盲委员会(PNAIC),总结巴西在数学教育背景下处理这一公共政策的论文和论文结果。PNAIC于2012年启动,在五年的时间里,来自5000多个城市的30多万识字教师参与其中。本文采用定性研究的方法,以描述性的形式,展示了这些研究的艺术现状。根据所宣布的研究目标,将所分析的作品分为三组:目的1:分析调查识字教师(75.5%)对PNAIC的意义;目的2:分析调查其他参与者(7.5%)对PNAIC的意义;目标3:揭开PNAIC的面纱(17%)。通过对与这些目标相关的研究结果的分析,我们得出了四个结论:1)PNAIC推动的培训支持了识字教师教学实践的改变;2) PNAIC推动的培训是必要的,但不足以扫盲;3) PNAIC推动的培训促使识字教师反思教学实践;4)PNAIC促进的培训存在不足。总之,本文对学位论文和论文中表现出的研究范围进行了初步分析,并支持实现新的研究,以深化对巴西有史以来实施的最广泛的培训计划之一的各个方面的分析和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Look at the National Pact for Literacy at the Right Age in the Mathematics Education Context
This article aims to present a public policy of large-scale literacy teachers continued training, the Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetizaçao na Idade Certa (PNAIC), making a summary of the Brazilian dissertations and theses results wich approached this public policy in the context of Mathematical Education. Initiated in 2012, the PNAIC involved more than three hundred thousand literacy teachers, from more than five thousand cities for five years. This article uses a qualitative research approach, in the descriptive modality, showing a status of the art of these researches. The set of works analyzed was divided into three groups, according to their declared research objectives: Objective 1: To analyzeinvestigate the meanings brought by the literacy teachers about the PNAIC (75.5%);Objective 2: To analyze-investigate the meanings brought by the other participants about the PNAIC (7.5%);and Objective 3: Unveil the PNAIC (17%). The analysis of the researches results associated with these objectives allowed us to reach four conclusions: 1) The trainings promoted by PNAIC supported changes in the pedagogical practices of the literacy teachers;2) the trainings promoted by PNAIC were necessary, but they wer not enough to combat illiteracy;3) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC induced the literacy teachers to reflections about the pedagogical practices and 4) the trainings promoted by the PNAIC showed weaknesses. In summary, this article presents an initial analysis of the scope from the manifested studies in dissertations and theses and supports the realization of new studies in order to deepen the analysis and evaluation of the varied aspects of one of the broadest training programs ever implemented in Brazil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics Enthusiast
Mathematics Enthusiast MATHEMATICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Mathematics Enthusiast (TME) is an eclectic internationally circulated peer reviewed journal which focuses on mathematics content, mathematics education research, innovation, interdisciplinary issues and pedagogy. The journal exists as an independent entity. The electronic version is hosted by the Department of Mathematical Sciences- University of Montana. The journal is NOT affiliated to nor subsidized by any professional organizations but supports PMENA [Psychology of Mathematics Education- North America] through special issues on various research topics. TME strives to promote equity internationally by adopting an open access policy, as well as allowing authors to retain full copyright of their scholarship contingent on the journals’ publication ethics guidelines. Authors do not need to be affiliated with the University of Montana in order to publish in this journal. Journal articles cover a wide spectrum of topics such as mathematics content (including advanced mathematics), educational studies related to mathematics, and reports of innovative pedagogical practices with the hope of stimulating dialogue between pre-service and practicing teachers, university educators and mathematicians. The journal is interested in research based articles as well as historical, philosophical, political, cross-cultural and systems perspectives on mathematics content, its teaching and learning. The journal also includes a monograph series on special topics of interest to the community of readers.
期刊最新文献
Stepping Stone Problem on Graphs Using Gardner's Three-Squares Problem for a Group Project in a Mathematical Problem Solving Module On Convincing Power of Counterexamples Numerate Life for Whom? A Non-book-review of John Allen Paulos’s A Numerate Life: Mathematician Explores the Vagaries of Life, His Own and Probably Yours Popularizing Mathematics Education Through Bad Drawings A Review of Ben Orlin’s Math with Bad Drawings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1