定义一个有效的心理治疗师对智力残疾和精神健康问题的特征:一项q分类研究

C. Clarke, N. Beail, S. Kellett
{"title":"定义一个有效的心理治疗师对智力残疾和精神健康问题的特征:一项q分类研究","authors":"C. Clarke, N. Beail, S. Kellett","doi":"10.1108/amhid-07-2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is little consensus regarding what constitutes an effective therapist when working with adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) who have a mental health problem. This study aims to explore whether clusters of clinical psychologists (CPs) could be differentiated with regards to beliefs as to what defines an effective therapist for adults with ID experiencing psychological distress and seeking treatment.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFour interviews with CPs and an associated thematic analysis created the 49-item Q-set. These items were then sorted into a forced quasi-normal distribution by N = 27 CPs via an online Q-sorting task.\n\n\nFindings\nThree participant clusters were identified in the principal components analysis that accounted for 49% of the variance. These clusters were labelled the creative collaborator, the reflective expert and the system integrator.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDifferences exist regarding beliefs as to what the psychotherapeutic approaches effective therapists working with ID and comorbid mental health problems should take. These differences approximated to preferred psychological therapy models. This study is critiqued to enable future research on this topic to progress.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore what constitutes an effective psychological therapist for people who have ID.\n","PeriodicalId":44693,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the characteristics of an effective psychological therapist for people with intellectual disability and mental health problems: a Q-sort study\",\"authors\":\"C. Clarke, N. Beail, S. Kellett\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/amhid-07-2022-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThere is little consensus regarding what constitutes an effective therapist when working with adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) who have a mental health problem. This study aims to explore whether clusters of clinical psychologists (CPs) could be differentiated with regards to beliefs as to what defines an effective therapist for adults with ID experiencing psychological distress and seeking treatment.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nFour interviews with CPs and an associated thematic analysis created the 49-item Q-set. These items were then sorted into a forced quasi-normal distribution by N = 27 CPs via an online Q-sorting task.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThree participant clusters were identified in the principal components analysis that accounted for 49% of the variance. These clusters were labelled the creative collaborator, the reflective expert and the system integrator.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nDifferences exist regarding beliefs as to what the psychotherapeutic approaches effective therapists working with ID and comorbid mental health problems should take. These differences approximated to preferred psychological therapy models. This study is critiqued to enable future research on this topic to progress.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore what constitutes an effective psychological therapist for people who have ID.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-07-2022-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-07-2022-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在与有心理健康问题的智障成年人合作时,关于什么是有效的治疗师,几乎没有达成共识。本研究旨在探索临床心理学家集群(CP)是否可以在信念方面进行区分,即对于经历心理困扰并寻求治疗的ID成人,如何定义有效的治疗师。设计/方法论/方法对CP的四次访谈和相关的主题分析创建了49项Q集。然后,通过在线Q排序任务,通过N=27个CP将这些项目排序为强制准正态分布。结果在主成分分析中确定了三个参与者集群,占方差的49%。这些集群被称为创造性合作者、反思专家和系统集成商。研究局限性/含义对于有效的ID和共病心理健康问题治疗师应该采取什么样的心理治疗方法,存在着不同的信念。这些差异近似于首选的心理治疗模型。对这项研究进行评论是为了使未来对这一主题的研究取得进展。独创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项探索ID患者的有效心理治疗师的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining the characteristics of an effective psychological therapist for people with intellectual disability and mental health problems: a Q-sort study
Purpose There is little consensus regarding what constitutes an effective therapist when working with adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) who have a mental health problem. This study aims to explore whether clusters of clinical psychologists (CPs) could be differentiated with regards to beliefs as to what defines an effective therapist for adults with ID experiencing psychological distress and seeking treatment. Design/methodology/approach Four interviews with CPs and an associated thematic analysis created the 49-item Q-set. These items were then sorted into a forced quasi-normal distribution by N = 27 CPs via an online Q-sorting task. Findings Three participant clusters were identified in the principal components analysis that accounted for 49% of the variance. These clusters were labelled the creative collaborator, the reflective expert and the system integrator. Research limitations/implications Differences exist regarding beliefs as to what the psychotherapeutic approaches effective therapists working with ID and comorbid mental health problems should take. These differences approximated to preferred psychological therapy models. This study is critiqued to enable future research on this topic to progress. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore what constitutes an effective psychological therapist for people who have ID.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Gabapentin treatment for challenging behaviors in autism spectrum disorder and coexisting intellectual disability: a case report The effectiveness of family-based treatment and pharmacotherapy in an adolescent with anorexia nervosa and intellectual disability: a case report Health literacy in parents of children with Down syndrome STOMP during COVID-19: use of psychotropic medication in intellectual disabilities community services – pilot QI project Co-design and pilot of a virtual reality intervention to improve mental and physical healthcare accessibility for people with intellectual disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1