国会选举的政治历史预测模型:从2022年竞选中吸取的教训

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1086/725252
S. Quinlan, M. Lewis-Beck
{"title":"国会选举的政治历史预测模型:从2022年竞选中吸取的教训","authors":"S. Quinlan, M. Lewis-Beck","doi":"10.1086/725252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"InDiscourses, Machiavelli opined, “it is easy, by diligent study of the past, to foresee what is likely to happen in the future in any republic.” The message: there is value in exploring history to predict. A strong pedigree of political science research acknowledges the importance of path dependence, “lock-in,” and “Laws of Politics.” Such recurrences at face bode well for forecasting. Election forecasting models traditionally use political-economic variables to predict results. In 2022, we formulated a model forecast of U.S. Congressional elections with a twist—spurning any public opinion or macroeconomy measure. Instead, we tested whether historical junctures, state-level party strength, and federalism dynamics offered solid guides to the performance of the Democratic Party, historically dominant in Congress since 1946. Our analysis demonstrated that this Political History model offered credible estimates of Democrats’ performance in thirty-eight Congressional elections from 1946–2020, with out-of-sample predictions","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Political-History Forecast Model of Congressional Elections: Lessons Learned from Campaign 2022\",\"authors\":\"S. Quinlan, M. Lewis-Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"InDiscourses, Machiavelli opined, “it is easy, by diligent study of the past, to foresee what is likely to happen in the future in any republic.” The message: there is value in exploring history to predict. A strong pedigree of political science research acknowledges the importance of path dependence, “lock-in,” and “Laws of Politics.” Such recurrences at face bode well for forecasting. Election forecasting models traditionally use political-economic variables to predict results. In 2022, we formulated a model forecast of U.S. Congressional elections with a twist—spurning any public opinion or macroeconomy measure. Instead, we tested whether historical junctures, state-level party strength, and federalism dynamics offered solid guides to the performance of the Democratic Party, historically dominant in Congress since 1946. Our analysis demonstrated that this Political History model offered credible estimates of Democrats’ performance in thirty-eight Congressional elections from 1946–2020, with out-of-sample predictions\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在《论》一书中,马基雅维利认为,“通过对过去的勤奋研究,很容易预见任何共和国未来可能发生的事情。”它传递的信息是:探索历史进行预测是有价值的。一个强大的政治科学研究谱系承认路径依赖、“锁定”和“政治法则”的重要性。这种反复出现的现象表面上是预测的好兆头。选举预测模型传统上使用政治经济变量来预测结果。在2022年,我们制定了一个扭曲的美国国会选举预测模型,摒弃了任何民意或宏观经济措施。相反,我们测试了历史转折点、州一级政党实力和联邦制动态是否为民主党的表现提供了可靠的指导,民主党自1946年以来一直在国会占据主导地位。我们的分析表明,这个政治历史模型对民主党在1946年至2020年的38次国会选举中的表现提供了可信的估计,并进行了样本外预测
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Political-History Forecast Model of Congressional Elections: Lessons Learned from Campaign 2022
InDiscourses, Machiavelli opined, “it is easy, by diligent study of the past, to foresee what is likely to happen in the future in any republic.” The message: there is value in exploring history to predict. A strong pedigree of political science research acknowledges the importance of path dependence, “lock-in,” and “Laws of Politics.” Such recurrences at face bode well for forecasting. Election forecasting models traditionally use political-economic variables to predict results. In 2022, we formulated a model forecast of U.S. Congressional elections with a twist—spurning any public opinion or macroeconomy measure. Instead, we tested whether historical junctures, state-level party strength, and federalism dynamics offered solid guides to the performance of the Democratic Party, historically dominant in Congress since 1946. Our analysis demonstrated that this Political History model offered credible estimates of Democrats’ performance in thirty-eight Congressional elections from 1946–2020, with out-of-sample predictions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1