机器学习在预测钢管混凝土柱轴压能力中的应用:系统综述

IF 1.7 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.1108/mmms-09-2022-0195
Aishwarya Narang, Ravi Kumar, A. Dhiman
{"title":"机器学习在预测钢管混凝土柱轴压能力中的应用:系统综述","authors":"Aishwarya Narang, Ravi Kumar, A. Dhiman","doi":"10.1108/mmms-09-2022-0195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study seeks to understand the connection of methodology by finding relevant papers and their full review using the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA).Design/methodology/approachConcrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns have gained popularity in construction in recent decades as they offer the benefit of constituent materials and cost-effectiveness. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Decision Trees (DTs) are some of the approaches that have been widely used in recent decades in structural engineering to construct predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Despite the fact that there are numerous research studies on the various parameters that influence the axial compression capacity (ACC) of CFST columns, there is no systematic review of these Machine Learning methods.FindingsThe implications of a variety of structural characteristics on machine learning performance parameters are addressed and reviewed. The comparison analysis of current design codes and machine learning tools to predict the performance of CFST columns is summarized. The discussion results indicate that machine learning tools better understand complex datasets and intricate testing designs.Originality/valueThis study examines machine learning techniques for forecasting the axial bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns. This paper also highlights the drawbacks of utilizing existing techniques to build CFST columns, and the benefits of Machine Learning approaches over them. This article attempts to introduce beginners and experienced professionals to various research trajectories.","PeriodicalId":46760,"journal":{"name":"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning applications to predict the axial compression capacity of concrete filled steel tubular columns: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Aishwarya Narang, Ravi Kumar, A. Dhiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mmms-09-2022-0195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study seeks to understand the connection of methodology by finding relevant papers and their full review using the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA).Design/methodology/approachConcrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns have gained popularity in construction in recent decades as they offer the benefit of constituent materials and cost-effectiveness. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Decision Trees (DTs) are some of the approaches that have been widely used in recent decades in structural engineering to construct predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Despite the fact that there are numerous research studies on the various parameters that influence the axial compression capacity (ACC) of CFST columns, there is no systematic review of these Machine Learning methods.FindingsThe implications of a variety of structural characteristics on machine learning performance parameters are addressed and reviewed. The comparison analysis of current design codes and machine learning tools to predict the performance of CFST columns is summarized. The discussion results indicate that machine learning tools better understand complex datasets and intricate testing designs.Originality/valueThis study examines machine learning techniques for forecasting the axial bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns. This paper also highlights the drawbacks of utilizing existing techniques to build CFST columns, and the benefits of Machine Learning approaches over them. This article attempts to introduce beginners and experienced professionals to various research trajectories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-09-2022-0195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mmms-09-2022-0195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究通过查找相关论文并使用“系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目”(PRISMA)对其进行全面审查,试图了解方法论之间的联系。近几十年来,钢管混凝土柱在施工中越来越受欢迎,因为它们提供了成分材料和成本效益。人工神经网络(Ann)、支持向量机(SVM)、基因表达程序设计(GEP)和决策树(DTs)是近几十年来在结构工程中被广泛用于构建预测模型的一些方法,从而产生有效和准确的决策。尽管对影响钢管混凝土柱轴压承载力(ACC)的各种参数进行了大量研究,但对这些机器学习方法没有系统的综述。发现研究了各种结构特征对机器学习性能参数的影响。总结了目前用于预测钢管混凝土柱性能的设计规范和机器学习工具的比较分析。讨论结果表明,机器学习工具可以更好地理解复杂的数据集和复杂的测试设计。独创性/价值本研究考察了用于预测钢管混凝土(CFST)柱轴向承载力的机器学习技术。本文还强调了利用现有技术构建CFST柱的缺点,以及机器学习方法相对于它们的好处。本文试图向初学者和经验丰富的专业人士介绍各种研究轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning applications to predict the axial compression capacity of concrete filled steel tubular columns: a systematic review
PurposeThis study seeks to understand the connection of methodology by finding relevant papers and their full review using the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA).Design/methodology/approachConcrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns have gained popularity in construction in recent decades as they offer the benefit of constituent materials and cost-effectiveness. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Decision Trees (DTs) are some of the approaches that have been widely used in recent decades in structural engineering to construct predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Despite the fact that there are numerous research studies on the various parameters that influence the axial compression capacity (ACC) of CFST columns, there is no systematic review of these Machine Learning methods.FindingsThe implications of a variety of structural characteristics on machine learning performance parameters are addressed and reviewed. The comparison analysis of current design codes and machine learning tools to predict the performance of CFST columns is summarized. The discussion results indicate that machine learning tools better understand complex datasets and intricate testing designs.Originality/valueThis study examines machine learning techniques for forecasting the axial bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns. This paper also highlights the drawbacks of utilizing existing techniques to build CFST columns, and the benefits of Machine Learning approaches over them. This article attempts to introduce beginners and experienced professionals to various research trajectories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures is published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited from 2010
期刊最新文献
Reliability analysis of various modeling techniques for the prediction of axial strain of FRP-confined concrete High-temperature oxidation and gas thermal shock studies of IC10 simulated specimens with thermal barrier coatings Research on torque measurement in flight test for all-moving horizontal tail based on spiral driver Viscous fluid flow and heat transfer past a permeable wall jet with convective boundary conditions Efficient aerodynamic optimization of turbine blade profiles: an integrated approach with novel HDSPSO algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1