2018-2022年俄罗斯科学政策:有争议的信号

Q3 Social Sciences Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Pub Date : 2023-06-29 DOI:10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10
I. Dezhina
{"title":"2018-2022年俄罗斯科学政策:有争议的信号","authors":"I. Dezhina","doi":"10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the Russian science policy that has been implemented during last five years, after setting new goals in 2018. Science policy measures are examined in the projection of three actors. The first actor is the government that sets goals, systems of management and coordination, and allocates the funds. The second actor is the Russian Academy of Sciences, which performs an expert function. The third actor is university science, which has become the main beneficiary of state support in recent years. The aim of the article is to identify the key directions of the country’s science policy in projections of the readiness of the science system to the radically changed geopolitical conditions that have emerged in 2022.\nDuring the last five years, the system of science management has evolved towards increased centralization of power. Such system allows concentrating resources on key tasks. However, such tasks that would need centralized effort were not set. The main objectives of the science policy focused on the diversification and integration of the Russian science into the international scientific community (through the improvement of positions in the international ratings, growth of publications indexed in international databases, encouraging academic mobility). The result of the contradicting government policy was unpreparedness of the science sector to sanctions. The state was able to undertake only actions of immediate reaction; the time was lost to develop measures aimed at existence in isolation from key world scientific powers.","PeriodicalId":35261,"journal":{"name":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia’s Science Policy in 2018–2022: Controversial Signals\",\"authors\":\"I. Dezhina\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the Russian science policy that has been implemented during last five years, after setting new goals in 2018. Science policy measures are examined in the projection of three actors. The first actor is the government that sets goals, systems of management and coordination, and allocates the funds. The second actor is the Russian Academy of Sciences, which performs an expert function. The third actor is university science, which has become the main beneficiary of state support in recent years. The aim of the article is to identify the key directions of the country’s science policy in projections of the readiness of the science system to the radically changed geopolitical conditions that have emerged in 2022.\\nDuring the last five years, the system of science management has evolved towards increased centralization of power. Such system allows concentrating resources on key tasks. However, such tasks that would need centralized effort were not set. The main objectives of the science policy focused on the diversification and integration of the Russian science into the international scientific community (through the improvement of positions in the international ratings, growth of publications indexed in international databases, encouraging academic mobility). The result of the contradicting government policy was unpreparedness of the science sector to sanctions. The state was able to undertake only actions of immediate reaction; the time was lost to develop measures aimed at existence in isolation from key world scientific powers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了俄罗斯在2018年制定新目标后,在过去五年中实施的科学政策。科学政策措施在三个行动者的预测中进行了审查。第一个行动者是制定目标、管理和协调系统以及分配资金的政府。第二个角色是俄罗斯科学院,该院履行专家职能。第三个参与者是大学科学,近年来它已成为国家支持的主要受益者。这篇文章的目的是确定国家科学政策的关键方向,以预测科学系统对2022年出现的根本变化的地缘政治条件的准备情况。在过去五年中,科学管理系统朝着权力更加集中的方向发展。这样的系统允许将资源集中在关键任务上。然而,这些需要集中努力的任务并没有确定。科学政策的主要目标侧重于俄罗斯科学的多样化和融入国际科学界(通过提高国际评级的地位、增加国际数据库中的出版物索引、鼓励学术流动)。与政府政策相矛盾的结果是科学部门对制裁毫无准备。国家只能采取立即反应的行动;我们浪费了时间来制定旨在与世界主要科学大国隔绝的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russia’s Science Policy in 2018–2022: Controversial Signals
The article analyzes the Russian science policy that has been implemented during last five years, after setting new goals in 2018. Science policy measures are examined in the projection of three actors. The first actor is the government that sets goals, systems of management and coordination, and allocates the funds. The second actor is the Russian Academy of Sciences, which performs an expert function. The third actor is university science, which has become the main beneficiary of state support in recent years. The aim of the article is to identify the key directions of the country’s science policy in projections of the readiness of the science system to the radically changed geopolitical conditions that have emerged in 2022. During the last five years, the system of science management has evolved towards increased centralization of power. Such system allows concentrating resources on key tasks. However, such tasks that would need centralized effort were not set. The main objectives of the science policy focused on the diversification and integration of the Russian science into the international scientific community (through the improvement of positions in the international ratings, growth of publications indexed in international databases, encouraging academic mobility). The result of the contradicting government policy was unpreparedness of the science sector to sanctions. The state was able to undertake only actions of immediate reaction; the time was lost to develop measures aimed at existence in isolation from key world scientific powers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal
Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” publishes the articles on sociological disciplines. Interdisciplinary studies in sociology and related disciplines, such as social psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, ethnography, etc. — are also welcomed. The main emphasis is on the fundamental research in the field of theory, methodology and history of sociology. The regular rubric highlights the results of mass surveys and case studies. The rubric “Discussion”, which debated the controversial issues of sociological research, is regular as well. The journal publishes book reviews, and summaries, as well as lists of new books in Russian and English, which represent the main areas of interdisciplinary research in the social sciences. The journal aims to not only play samples of knowledge, considered regulatory and standards of internal expertise in the professional community, but also aims for opportunities to improve them. These rules, a tough selection and decision to print only a small portion of incoming materials allow “Sotsiologicheskij Zhurnal” contribute to improving the quality of sociological research. Submitted manuscripts should show a high integrity in problem setting, problem analysis and correspond to the journal’s thematic profile and its scientific priorities.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical Approaches Towards Studying Motivation for Surrogate Motherhood A Person that Feels, Values, and Studies Time. Professor Garold E. Zborovsky is 85 Years Old Is it Possible for a Society to Exist Without Development? Telemedicine in Russian Megacities: Problems and Prospects Batygin’s Lesson stuck with me on my Professional Path — Always Check Yourself to Make Sure your Conclusions Can Be Substantiated”. Interview Prepared by D.M. Rogozin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1