Ehsan Neamatollahi, M. Akbari, R. Afshari, Mohammad Alizadeh Noughani
{"title":"残茬与耕作方式对甜瓜生长、产量及产量构成的互作效应","authors":"Ehsan Neamatollahi, M. Akbari, R. Afshari, Mohammad Alizadeh Noughani","doi":"10.17503/AGRIVITA.V43I3.2968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional tillage is practiced substantialy in melon growing areas. Although conventional tillage has destructive effects on the environment, it also has many negative effects on the health of agroecosystems and crop production. However, very few experiments and data have been conducted to investigate the functional differences (growth, yield and yield components) of melon crop under different tillage methods. Field experiments were accomplished to research the interactive effect of residue and tillage methods on growth analysis, yield and yield components of melon during the 2019 growing season. Tillage treatments in this research included were conventional tillage (CT; moldboard ploughing + two passes of disk harrowing), no-tillage (NT) and minimum tillage (MT; one pass of disk harrowing) and. Residue treatments were included 0%, 30% and 60%. Yield, yield components included fruit weight per plant (FWPP), the number of fruit per plant (NFPP), diameter (D), length (L), sugar (S), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) were obtained for all treatments. Results showed that tillage methods significantly (P≤0.05) influenced the yield and yield components. Analysis of variance results showed that yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L, S and RUE were significantly under the different tillage methods, moreover yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L and S were significantly under the different residue percentage and interactive effect of tillage and residue. The maximum FWPP (2.678kg), NFPP (6.799), D (18.49cm), L (45.93cm), S (12.51%) and RUE (2.470) as a result yield (16.17 t ha -1 ) were observed with the CT. Also, maximum FWPP (2.192), NFPP (5.353), D (16.66), L (39.52) and yield (12.83 t ha -1 ) were obtained from 30% residue. On the other hand, maximum FWPP (2.850), NFPP (6.790), D (20.71), L (53.53) and yield (17.09 t ha -1 ) from CT30% were obtained. Therefore, moldboard ploughing followed by two passes of disk harrow with 30% residue were found to be more appropriate and profitable tillage method and residue percentage in improving the yield of melon in the temperate cold climatic zone. Almost all of the growth indicators were optimum for conservation tillage treatments, especially with 30% residue.","PeriodicalId":44658,"journal":{"name":"Agrivita","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactive Effects of Residue and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Melon\",\"authors\":\"Ehsan Neamatollahi, M. Akbari, R. Afshari, Mohammad Alizadeh Noughani\",\"doi\":\"10.17503/AGRIVITA.V43I3.2968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional tillage is practiced substantialy in melon growing areas. Although conventional tillage has destructive effects on the environment, it also has many negative effects on the health of agroecosystems and crop production. However, very few experiments and data have been conducted to investigate the functional differences (growth, yield and yield components) of melon crop under different tillage methods. Field experiments were accomplished to research the interactive effect of residue and tillage methods on growth analysis, yield and yield components of melon during the 2019 growing season. Tillage treatments in this research included were conventional tillage (CT; moldboard ploughing + two passes of disk harrowing), no-tillage (NT) and minimum tillage (MT; one pass of disk harrowing) and. Residue treatments were included 0%, 30% and 60%. Yield, yield components included fruit weight per plant (FWPP), the number of fruit per plant (NFPP), diameter (D), length (L), sugar (S), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) were obtained for all treatments. Results showed that tillage methods significantly (P≤0.05) influenced the yield and yield components. Analysis of variance results showed that yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L, S and RUE were significantly under the different tillage methods, moreover yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L and S were significantly under the different residue percentage and interactive effect of tillage and residue. The maximum FWPP (2.678kg), NFPP (6.799), D (18.49cm), L (45.93cm), S (12.51%) and RUE (2.470) as a result yield (16.17 t ha -1 ) were observed with the CT. Also, maximum FWPP (2.192), NFPP (5.353), D (16.66), L (39.52) and yield (12.83 t ha -1 ) were obtained from 30% residue. On the other hand, maximum FWPP (2.850), NFPP (6.790), D (20.71), L (53.53) and yield (17.09 t ha -1 ) from CT30% were obtained. Therefore, moldboard ploughing followed by two passes of disk harrow with 30% residue were found to be more appropriate and profitable tillage method and residue percentage in improving the yield of melon in the temperate cold climatic zone. Almost all of the growth indicators were optimum for conservation tillage treatments, especially with 30% residue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrivita\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrivita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17503/AGRIVITA.V43I3.2968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrivita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17503/AGRIVITA.V43I3.2968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在甜瓜种植区基本上实行常规耕作。虽然传统耕作对环境有破坏性影响,但对农业生态系统的健康和作物生产也有许多负面影响。然而,很少有实验和数据研究不同耕作方式下甜瓜作物的功能差异(生长、产量和产量成分)。通过田间试验,研究了2019年生长季残茬与耕作方式对甜瓜生长分析、产量及产量构成因素的交互效应。本研究的耕作处理包括常规耕作(CT);犁耕+两道盘耙)、免耕(NT)和少耕(MT);一遍磁盘耙)和。残留处理为0%、30%和60%。各处理的产量、产量组成包括单株果重(FWPP)、单株果数(NFPP)、直径(D)、长度(L)、糖(S)、辐射利用效率(RUE)和水分利用效率(WUE)。结果表明,不同耕作方式对产量和产量构成因素影响显著(P≤0.05)。方差分析结果表明,不同耕作方式对产量、FWPP、NFPP、D、L、S和RUE影响显著,对产量、FWPP、NFPP、D、L和S影响显著。结果显示,该品种的最大FWPP (2.678kg)、NFPP (6.799 kg)、D (18.49cm)、L (45.93cm)、S(12.51%)和RUE(2.470)产量为16.17 t / ha -1。30%秸秆可获得最高的FWPP(2.192)、NFPP(5.353)、D(16.66)、L(39.52)和产量(12.83 t ha -1)。另一方面,CT30%可获得最大FWPP(2.850)、NFPP(6.790)、D(20.71)、L(53.53)和产量(17.09 t ha -1)。因此,在温带寒气区,采用板犁后翻耙两道,残率30%的耕作方式和残率是提高甜瓜产量的较适宜和有利的耕作方式。保护性耕作处理几乎所有的生长指标都是最优的,特别是30%残茬处理。
Interactive Effects of Residue and Tillage Methods on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Melon
Conventional tillage is practiced substantialy in melon growing areas. Although conventional tillage has destructive effects on the environment, it also has many negative effects on the health of agroecosystems and crop production. However, very few experiments and data have been conducted to investigate the functional differences (growth, yield and yield components) of melon crop under different tillage methods. Field experiments were accomplished to research the interactive effect of residue and tillage methods on growth analysis, yield and yield components of melon during the 2019 growing season. Tillage treatments in this research included were conventional tillage (CT; moldboard ploughing + two passes of disk harrowing), no-tillage (NT) and minimum tillage (MT; one pass of disk harrowing) and. Residue treatments were included 0%, 30% and 60%. Yield, yield components included fruit weight per plant (FWPP), the number of fruit per plant (NFPP), diameter (D), length (L), sugar (S), radiation use efficiency (RUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) were obtained for all treatments. Results showed that tillage methods significantly (P≤0.05) influenced the yield and yield components. Analysis of variance results showed that yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L, S and RUE were significantly under the different tillage methods, moreover yield, FWPP, NFPP, D, L and S were significantly under the different residue percentage and interactive effect of tillage and residue. The maximum FWPP (2.678kg), NFPP (6.799), D (18.49cm), L (45.93cm), S (12.51%) and RUE (2.470) as a result yield (16.17 t ha -1 ) were observed with the CT. Also, maximum FWPP (2.192), NFPP (5.353), D (16.66), L (39.52) and yield (12.83 t ha -1 ) were obtained from 30% residue. On the other hand, maximum FWPP (2.850), NFPP (6.790), D (20.71), L (53.53) and yield (17.09 t ha -1 ) from CT30% were obtained. Therefore, moldboard ploughing followed by two passes of disk harrow with 30% residue were found to be more appropriate and profitable tillage method and residue percentage in improving the yield of melon in the temperate cold climatic zone. Almost all of the growth indicators were optimum for conservation tillage treatments, especially with 30% residue.
期刊介绍:
The aims of the journal are to publish and disseminate high quality, original research papers and article review in plant science i.e.: -agronomy -horticulture -plant breeding -soil sciences -plant protection -other pertinent field related to plant production